Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T03:52:14.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working Together Across Difference: Some Considerations on Emotions and Political Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Uma Narayan
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Uma Narayan attempts to clarify what the feminist notion of the ‘epistemic privilege of the oppressed’ does and does not imply. She argues that the fact that oppressed ‘insiders’ have epistemic privilege regarding their oppression creates problems in dialogue with and coalitionary politics involving ‘outsiders’ who do not share the oppression, since the latter fail to come to terms with the epistemic privilege of the insiders. She concretely analyzes different ways in which the emotions of insiders can be inadvertantly hurt by outsiders and suggests ways in which such problems can be minimized.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Summer 1988, pp. 31 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

∗

I wish to thank Martin Eisenberg, Mary Gibson and Howard McGary for the many stimulating discussions out of which this paper came to be written. I wish to thank Alison Jaggar, Iris Marion Young and Karen Warren for the many helpful comments they provided on the issues as well as for the tremendous encouragement they have provided.

References

Baier, Annette. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96: 231–260.10.1086/292745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill, eds. 1983. Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, methodology, and philosophy of science. New York: Dordrecht and Reidel.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. The feminist standpoint: A specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality, eds. Harding, S. and Hintikka, M., 283–310. New York: Dordrecht and Reidel.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria C. and Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1983. Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism and the demand for ‘woman's voice’. Hypatia (1), published as a special issue of Women's Studies International Forum. 6: 573–581.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1986. Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. Praxis International. 5:382–401.Google Scholar