Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T11:29:00.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of methods for microbiologic environmental sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2022

Sharon C. Thompson*
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
William A. Rutala
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Emily E. Sickbert-Bennett
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North CarolinaDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Lauren M. DiBiase
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Deverick J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
David J. Weber
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North CarolinaDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
Author for correspondence: Sharon C. Thompson, E-mail: sharon.thompson@unchealth.unc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of 4 sampling methods to recover Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Clostridioides difficile from contaminated environmental surfaces: cotton swabs, RODAC culture plates, sponge sticks with manual agitation, and sponge sticks with a stomacher. Organism type was the most important factor in bacterial recovery.

Information

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Illustration of steps used for assessing the effectiveness of 4 sampling methods. Photographs illustrating various stages of study: (A) applying bacterial dilution to test surface; (B) colonies of Staphylococcus aureus growing on agar plates from samples obtained by swabs; (C) collecting surface sample using sponge stick; and (D) colonies of Clostridioides difficile growing on a RODAC agar plate.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Recovery of test organisms by four sampling methods. Average recovery in CFU/in² and 95% CI for Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridioides difficile for each method and surface combination.