Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:27:30.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Rigid Container Systems for Sterilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Peggy Ryan
Peggy Ryan*
Affiliation:
Ryan Associates, Arvada, Colorado
*
6750 Allison Street, Arvada, CO 80004
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The packaging of surgical instruments, medical devices and procedure trays for sterilization is indeed important. There are three choices for packaging.

The first two methods use traditional over-wrap packaging, with either reusable flat wraps of muslin or tightly woven textiles, or one of several types of nonwoven disposable wraps. Reusable wrappers must be monitored by labor-intensive inspection, delinting and frequent patching, and are easily contaminated. In addition, disposable wraps can develop tears and holes compromising the sterility of the contents. Thus, both reusable and disposable wrappers have drawbacks.

Information

Type
Special Sections
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 10 , Issue 11 , November 1989, pp. 525 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Suggested Reading

1. Kneedler, J, Gattas, M. A study of sterilization containers. Journal of Healthcare Material Management. 1988;6:24–30.Google Scholar
2. Ryan, P. Rigid sterilization container systems: their contribution to aseptic practices. Journal of Healthcare Material Management. 1986;4:23–27.Google Scholar
3. Ryan, PI. Rigid packaging container systems for in-hospital processing. Particulate and Microbial Control. May/June 1984;48–50.Google Scholar
4. Reichert, MG. Comparison of instrument container systems choosing the right one. Journal of Healthcare Material Management. 1984;2:26–31.Google Scholar
5. Reichert, MG. Innovations in sterilization technology for instrument processing. Med Instrum. 1983;17:89–90.Google Scholar
6. Kagan, J. A testing and evaluation protocol for inhospital sterilization containers and its application in a new container system. Med Instrum. 1984;19:276–279.Google Scholar
7. Association of Operating Room Nurses. Proposed recommended practices: product evaluation and selection for patient care in the practice setting. AORN J. 1988;48:102–105.Google Scholar
8. Product Information-Available from manufacturers of container systems.Google Scholar
9. Reickert, MM, Ryan, P. Questions OR nurses ask about sterilization container systems. OR Manager. 1986;2:1–2.Google Scholar
10. Whitbourne, J. Research shows containers can be effectively sterilized. OR Manager. 1986;2:3–4.Google Scholar
11. Riley, J. No magic pan. OR Manager. 1986;2:4.Google Scholar