Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T23:03:33.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic Differences in Trigonometric Parallaxes from different Observatories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

W.F.van Altena,
E.D. Hoffleit and
H.A. Smith
W.F.van Altena
Affiliation:
Yale University Observatory
E.D. Hoffleit
Affiliation:
Yale University Observatory
H.A. Smith
Affiliation:
Yale University Observatory

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Systematic differences in trigonometric parallaxes between Allegheny Observatory and Yale Observatory, between Allegheny Observatory and McCormick Observatory and between the Cape Observatory and Yale Observatory have been investigated for stars common to each pair. The differences found correlate with right ascension, naturally suggesting some sort of annual influence. It is proposed that these differences are related to differences in the annual temperature cycle between observatories, possibly through the mechanism of temperature dependent decentering of the telescope objectives. A dependence upon spectral type was also discovered in the differences between the relative parallaxes from Allegheny and from Yale. Further work is needed to clarify the nature of these systematic effects and to insure that they do not significantly bias available trigonometric parallaxes.

It is proposed that a new parallax catalogue be constructed at Yale after a thorough statistical analysis of all available trigonometric parallaxes has been made. We solicit suggestions and recommendations from interested users.

References

Atkinson, R. d’A. (1971). Publ. Leander McCormick Obs. XVI, 259.Google Scholar
Conrady, A.E. (1919). Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 79, 384.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, T. (1960). Ark. Astr. 2, No.45.Google Scholar
Davidson, C.R. (1934). Obs. 57, 236.Google Scholar
Gliese, W. (1972). Quar. Journ. Roy. Astr. Soc. 13, 138.Google Scholar
Ianna, P.A.(1965). Vistas in Astron. 6, 94.Google Scholar
Jenkins, L.F. (1952). General Catalog of Trigonometric Stellar Parallaxes (Yale University).Google Scholar
Kamper, K.W. (1971). Publ. Leander McCormick Obs. XVI, 285.Google Scholar
Ljunggren, B., and Oja, T. (1965). Ark. Astr. 3, No.35.Google Scholar
van Maanen, A. (1933). Astrophys.J. 78, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S.A. (1934). Astrophys. J. 80, 200.Google Scholar
Nelson, H.L. (1968). Climatic Data for Representative Stations of the World, (Univ. of Nebraska Press).Google Scholar
Sterne, T.E. (1975). Astrophys. J. 81, 45.Google Scholar
Strand, K. Aa. (1971). Publ. Leander McCormick Obs., XVI, 15.Google Scholar
Turon LaCarrieu, C., and Creze, M. (1976). (preprint).Google Scholar