Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T05:57:01.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low loss PTFE core metal/dielectric waveguide for W band applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2026

Prakash Gyawali*
Affiliation:
Institute for Electronics Microelectronics and Nanotechnology, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
Alexandre Renau
Affiliation:
Institute for Electronics Microelectronics and Nanotechnology, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
Ludovic Burgnies
Affiliation:
Institute for Electronics Microelectronics and Nanotechnology, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, F-62100, Calais, France
Ronan Cranny
Affiliation:
Axon’ Cable, F-51210, France
Julien Logette
Affiliation:
Axon’ Cable, F-51210, France
Stephanie Geas
Affiliation:
Axon’ Cable, F-51210, France
Antoine Baudin
Affiliation:
Axon’ Cable, F-51210, France
Yanis Charif
Affiliation:
Axon’ Cable, F-51210, France
Pascal Szriftgiser
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers Atomes et Molécules, France
Guillaume Ducournau
Affiliation:
Institute for Electronics Microelectronics and Nanotechnology, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
*
Corresponding author: Prakash Gyawali; Email: prakash.gyawali@univ-lille.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study presents the design and experimental validation of a flexible, low-loss waveguide operating in the single-mode regime in W-band (75–110 GHz). The waveguide design and geometric parameters were numerically optimized using electromagnetic simulations. Fabrication was carried out using industrial-grade polytetrafluoroethylene extrusion and metal ribbon deposition processes. The waveguide performance, namely the propagation loss and effective refractive index, was characterized using a vector network analyzer in the 70–120 GHz frequency range. Measurements demonstrate a propagation loss lower than 11.7 dB/m in the W-band.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The European Microwave Association.
Figure 0

Table 1. Evolution of the proposed FWG in comparison with the previous one shown in [9]Table 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Cross-section and (b) perspective view of the flexible waveguide.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Schematic of calibration plane. (b) View of a flexible waveguide under test: injection at ZC110 extender Port 2.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Measurement setup for FWG samples: (a) 30 cm long in straight configuration, (b) 50 cm long in bent configuration with a bending radius Rc = 2 cm.

Figure 4

Figure 4. S-parameters as a function of frequency: (a) S11, (b) S21.Figure 4 long description.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Measured S21 responses of 30, 50, and 100 cm flexible waveguides in straight and bent configurations at a constant bending radius of Rc = 2 cm.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Magnitude of S21 as a function of the waveguide length measured in straight configuration, actual data (triangles) and linear regression (dashed lines). (b) Comparison of the attenuation constant of the flexible waveguide as a function of frequency.

Figure 7

Figure 7. (a) Group delay as a function of the waveguide length, actual data (triangles) and linear regression (dashed lines). (b) Effective refractive index as a function of frequency.

Figure 8

Table 2. Measured and simulated effective dielectric constant of the flexible waveguideTable 2 long description.

Figure 9

Table 3. Some examples of coaxial cables and flexible waveguides currently available on the marketTable 3 long description.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Photograph of the data transmission testbed.Figure 8 long description.

Figure 11

Figure 9. (a) EVM-power performance curves for B2B (A) and through the bent 321 mm flexible waveguide (B). (b) QAM-64 I/Q maps for both B2B and FWG measurements.Figure 9 long description.