Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:44:25.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2004

Peter Winn
Affiliation:
Tufts University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Some three decades have elapsed since feminists turned the scholarly spotlight on the previously ignored historical experience of half the world's population. Nearly two decades have transpired since the publication of Joan Scott's pathbreaking essay on gender and history.Joan Scott, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” American Historical Review 91, 5 (1986). See also Joan Scott's article “On Language, Gender, and Working-Class History,” International Labor and Working-Class History 31 (1987): 1–13, and her reflections on gender as a category of historical analysis in “Preface to the Revised Edition,” in Gender and the Politics of History (New York, 2000), especially ix–xii. Since then, women's history and increasingly sophisticated forms of gender analysis have altered understandings of and approaches to many fields of history.

Information

Type
Labor History After the Gender Turn
Copyright
© 2003 The International Labor and Working-Class History Society