No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
International Labor Organization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 May 2009
Extract
The sixth report of the International Labor Organization to the United Nations noted that, in the preparation of the 1953 program of ILO, the organization had found itself faced with the necessity of distinguishing between what was essential and what was desirable. “The criteria for this distinction have been the financial capacity of Governments to pay.’ Two general objectives toward which all ILO activities were directed were methods of increasing labor productivity and action to secure and maintain full employment. However, it was emphasized that these were long-range objectives which could not be measured in the “arbitrary time limit” of a single year. Shifts in emphasis in ILO's program were more apparent in different types of activity within these general fields rather than in the adoption of a different program. For example, the report continued, in 1950 when there appeared that a threat of recession in the United States and Europe existed, ILO placed particular emphasis on problems of full employment; since that time, ILO had placed increasing emphasis on problems of underemployment in underdeveloped countries.
Information
- Type
- International Organizations: Summary of Activities: II. Specialized Agencies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The IO Foundation 1952
References
1 For information on previous activities of ILO, see International Organization, VI, p. 303–306.
2 International Labor Organization, Sixth Report of the International Labour Organization to the United Nations, Geneva, 1952Google Scholar.
3 International Labor Conference (35th session), Report II, Geneva, 1952Google Scholar; Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 291.
4 Document G.B. 118/6/9, n.d.; document G.B. 118/6/24, n.d.; Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 291.
5 Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 292–293.
6 Document G.B. 118/2/4, n.d.
7 Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 293–294.
8 Document G.B. 118/3/1, n.d.
9 Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 294–297.
10 Document G.B. 118/4/3, n.d.
11 Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 298.
12 Document G.B. 118/16/16, n.d.
13 Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 298–299.
14 Document G.B. 118/13/25, n.d.
15 Document G.B. 118/11/18, n.d. document G.B. 118/11/23, n.d.
16 Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 299–300.
17 Ibid., p. 305.
18 Document G.B. 118/16/8, n.d.
19 Industry and Labour, April 15, 1952, p. 305–306.
20 Ibid., p. 301–302.
21 Document G.B. 118/16/13, n.d.
22 ILO News, 06 1952Google Scholar.
23 Department of State, Bulletin, XXVI, p. 838Google Scholar.
24 International Labor Conference (35th session), Report 1, Geneva, 1952Google Scholar.
25 Ibid., Report II, Geneva, 1952.
26 Ibid., Report III (Part I), Geneva, 1952.
27 Ibid., Report III (Part II), Geneva, 1952.
28 Ibid., Report III (Part III), Geneva, 1952.
29 Ibid., Report III (Part IV), Geneva, 1952.
30 Ibid., Report V (a) (2), Geneva, 1952.
31 Ibid., Report V (b), Geneva, 1952.
32 Ibid., Report VII, Geneva, 1952.
33 ILO News, 04 1952Google Scholar.
34 Ibid., June 1952.
35 A detailed summary of this meeting may be found in Industry and Labour, June 1, 1952, p. 400–413.
36 International Labor Organization, Fifth Conference of American States Members of the International Labour Organization, Report of the Director-General, Geneva, 1952Google Scholar. A detailed account of this meeting may be found in Industry and Labour, June 15, 1952, p. 438–447.