Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T23:31:32.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multilateralism—Diplomatic and Otherwise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Inis L. Claude JR
Get access

Extract

‘Multilateral diplomacy’, like many other terms current in the literature of international relations, tends to serve less as a topic for careful study than as a symbol, evoking generalized reactions of approval or disapproval, confidence or anxiety. In the mind of the public, the mention of those two words today calls up a picture of a big, noisy international conference, complete with committees and chairmen, agenda and rules of procedure, debates and votes, rostrum and gallery, earphones for simultaneous translation and microphones and cameras for world-wide transmission of the proceedings.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Winter 1958 , pp. 43 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Nicolson, Harold, The Evolution of Diplomatic Method, New York, Macmillan, 1954, p. 89Google Scholar.

2 Article 3.

3 See Goodrich, Leland M. and Simons, Anne P., The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security, Washington, The Brookings Institution, 1955, Part ThreeGoogle Scholar; Hyde, James M., ‘The Development of Procedures for the Peaceful Adjustment of mediator of Disputes,’ Commission to Study the Organization of Peace, Charter Review Conference: Ninth Report and Papers Presented to the Commission, New York, 1955, p. 153–166Google Scholar; Mohn, Paul, ‘Problems of Truce Supervision,’ International Conciliation, 02 1952 (No. 478)Google Scholar.

4 Pearson, Lester B., Democracy in World Politics, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1955, p. 65Google Scholar.

5 Ibid., p. 68.

6 Feller, A. H., United Nations and World Community, Boston, Little, Brown, 1952, p. 119Google Scholar.

7 Claude, Inis L. Jr, Swords Into Plowshares, New York, Random House, 1956, p. 327–328Google Scholar.

8 See General Assembly Resolution 912 (X), Section II, December 3, 1955.

9 See Part II, Section E, of the Standing Orders of the International Labour Conference. Constitution of the International Labour Organisation and Standing Orders of the International Labour Conference, Geneva, 1955Google Scholar.

10 White, E. B., Tbe Wild Flag, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1946, p. 24–27, 144, 148Google Scholar.

11 See the thoughtful analysis of this problem in Loveday, A., Reflections on International Administration, London, Oxford University Press, 1956, p. 230–234Google Scholar.

12 Phelan, E. J., Yes and Albert Thomas, New York, Columbia University Press, 1949Google Scholar; Schwebel, Stephen M., The Secretary-General of the United Nations, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lie, Trygve, In the Cause of Peace, New York, Macmillan, 1954Google Scholar; Jackson, Elmore, ‘The Developing Role of the Secretary-General,’ International Organization, Summer 1957 (Vol. XI, No. 3), p. 431–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bokhari, A. S., ‘Parliaments, Priests and Prophets,’ Foreign Affairs, 04 1957 (Vol. 35. No. 3), p. 405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Jackson, op. cit.; Frye, William R., A United Nations Peace Force, New York, Oceana Publications, 1957Google Scholar.