No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Soviet Security Objectives in Asia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 May 2009
Extract
Three momentous events of the 1960's—the war in Vietnam, the steady worsening of the Sino-Soviet dispute, and the Chinese acquisition of nuclear weapons—portend a shift in the political center of gravity from Europe to Asia in the last third of this century. The Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia only temporarily ruffled Europe's political terrain, and, while it damaged Moscow's international prestige, it never threatened to'escalate into superpower confrontation on the continent. The United States and its North Adantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies, in fact, went out of their way to avoid provoking the Soviet Union; the ritualistic tone of their denunciations of the invasion indicated that, as after Hungary in 1956, the West was resigned to Moscow's freedom of action in its Eastern European “sphere of influence”. Emboldened by the Western response, the Soviet Union reiterated with increased vigor its proposal for a European security conference to freeze the status quo in Europe.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The IO Foundation 1970
References
1 Murarka, Dev, “The Kremlin at Large”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 08 21, 1969 (Vol. 66, No. 34), p. 491Google Scholar.
2 Whetten, Lawrence, “Moscow's Anti-China Pact”, The World Today, 09 1969 (Vol. 25, No. 9). P. 393Google Scholar.
3 This article deals with South and Southeast Asia and the Far East; the Middle East, although part of Asia, is not treated because of the unique blend of historical and strategic factors influencing Soviet policy there.
4 See Salisbury, Harrison E., “Marco Polo Would Recognize Mao's Sinkiang”, The New York Times Magazine, 11 21, 1969Google Scholar.
5 United States military experts believe China may well have a modest ICBM force by the mid-1970's. Even though such a force would probably not be hardened or otherwise protected, its very existence would make Moscow very cautious about military action along the Sino-Soviet border.
6 Apalin, G., “Maoism—Imperialist Reaction's Reserves”, International Affairs (Moscow), 07 1969 (No. 7), p. 40Google Scholar.
7 Ibid., p. 39.
8 Kapchenko, N., “The Heart of Maoism and Its Policies”, International Affairs (Moscow), 05 1969 (No. 5), p. 15Google Scholar.
9 Ibid., p. 16.
10 On the other hand some Western sources speculated that the Russians instigated the border clashes as a pretext for not dealing forcefully with the German election issue.
11 Dronov, A., “Peking's Undercover Contacts”, New Times, 03 5, 1969 (No. 9), p. 21Google Scholar.
12 Apalin, G., “New Period in Peking's Foreign Policy”, International Affairs (Moscow), 02 1969 (No. 2), p. 11Google Scholar.
13 Teplinsky, B., “Military Blocs and Imperialist Global Strategy”, New Times, 09 10, 1969 (No. 36), p. 19Google Scholar.
14 Simmons, Michael, East European correspondent of the Financial Times, London, 04 16, 1969.Google Scholar See also Herrick, R. Waring, “The Warsaw Pact, Brezhnev Doctrine, and China”, Radio Liberty Dispatch, 04 28, 1969Google Scholar.
15 United Press International release from Budapest, 03 15, 1969. See also Herrick, Google Scholar.
16 Quoted in Radio liberty Dispatch, April 16, 1969.
17 Pravda editorial, August 28, 1969.
18 Sorenson, Jay B., “Asian Defense—Soviet Style”, Far Eastern Economic Renew, 07 13–19, 1969 (Vol. 66, No. 29), p. 85Google Scholar.
19 Buchan, Alastair, “An Asian Balance of Power?” Australian Journal of Politics and History, 08 1966 (Vol. 12, No. 2), p. 278Google Scholar.
20 Vasilyev, D., “Japan Rearms”, New Times, 06 25, 1969 (No. 25), p. 25Google Scholar.
21 Ibid., p. 24.
22 lzvestia, June 26, 1969.
23 Pravda, July 30, 1969.
24 Vidyasova, L., “Visiting Our Far Eastern Neighbors”, International Affairs (Moscow), 07 1969 (No. 7), pp. 97–98Google Scholar.
25 Sergienko, I., “Japanese Militarism Raises Its Head”, International Affairs (Moscow), 06 1969 (No. 6), p. 33Google Scholar.
26 See Yuter, S. C., “Preventing Nuclear Proliferation through Legal Control of China's Bomb”, Orbis, Winter 1969 (Vol. 12, No. 4), p. 1029Google Scholar.
27 Quoted in The New York Times, September 28, 1968.
28 The New York Times, January 24, 1969.
29 Seth, S. P., “Russia's Role in Indo-Pakistani Politics”, Asian Survey, 08 1969 (Vol. 9, No. 8), p. 619CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Text of document in Pravda, June 18, 1969.
31 Text of Gromyko's, speech in Pravda, 07 11, 1969Google Scholar.
32 Quoted in “The United Nations and Internationa l Security”, International Affairs (Moscow), 11 1969 (No. 11), pp. 5–10Google Scholar.
33 Soviet ambassadors in other Asian countries, especially pro-American ones, were equally vague.
34 See The New York Times, October 25, 1969.
35 Munthe-Kaas, Harald, “Back to the Drawing Board”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 10 9, 1969 (Vol. 66, No. 41), p. 84Google Scholar.
36 “Asian Security—Soviet Style”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 07 24, 1969 (Vol. 66, No. 30), p. 204Google Scholar.
37 Pavlovsky, D., “Problems of Regionalism in Asia”, International Affairs (Moscow), 04 1969 (No. 4). PP. 49–50Google Scholar.
38 Ibid, p. 46.
39 Aichi, Kiichi, “Japan's Legacy and Destiny of Change”, Foreign Affairs, 10 1969 (Vol. 48, No. 1), p. 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
40 See Kroef, Justus M. Van der, “Australia's New Search for Collective Security”, Orbis, Summer 1969 (Vol. 13, No. 2), p. 542Google Scholar.
41 “Asian Security—Soviet Style”, Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 66, No. 30, p. 246.
42 Murarka, Dev, Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 66, No. 34, p. 492Google Scholar.
43 “Asian Security—Soviet Style””, Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 66, No. 30, p. 246.
44 China has no outlet on the Indian Ocean; it could possibly acquire land access to the ocean or port facilities there through arrangements with various states, including Pakistan, Ceylon, Burma, or Singapore.
45 See Long, John, “The Soviet Armed Forces in the 1970's”, Radio Liberty Dispatch, 05 2, 1968Google Scholar.
46 Seth, , Asian Survey, Vol. 9, No. 8, p. 619Google Scholar.
47 Gregory, Gene, “Is Mao Facing Collusion?” Far Eastern Economic Review, 07 24, 1969 (Vol. 66, No. 30), p. 202Google Scholar.