Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T12:00:30.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religion in the Shahnameh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Dick Davis
Dick Davis*
Affiliation:
Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures at the Ohio State University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses the reasons why Ferdowsi does not begin the Shahnameh with the episode of Zoroaster, which he quotes from the version of Daqiqi, but rather with an account of the creation of the world that, in contrast to Islamic historians writing before Ferdowsi, does not attempt to accommodate a Qur'anic view of creation and human history, but neither does he give a cosmology dominated or well informed by Zoroastrian theology. Similarly, Ferdowsi tends to present pre-Islamic Iran as having a consistent religious history, and perhaps avoids beginning with Goshtāsp's conversion to the religion of Zoroaster, as he makes Daqiqi appear to do, in order to minimize the role of religious conflict in Iranian history, again diverging from historians of the Islamic period writing before him. The article also explores the role of God in the Shahnameh and the absence of theodicy.

Keywords

DaqiqiFerdowsiGodGoshtāspIranian IdentityIslamReligionTheodicyZoroaster

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 3: The Shahnameh of Ferdowsi as World Literature , May 2015, pp. 337 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adang, Camilla. “The Chronology of the Israelites According to Hamza al-Isfahani.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 32 (2006): 286–310.Google Scholar
Davis, Dick. Fathers and Sons: Stories from the Shahnameh of Ferdowsi. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Mage Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
Davis, Dick. “The Problem of Ferdowsî’s Sources,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 116, no. 1 (January–March 1996): 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Dick. “Rostam and Zoroastrianism.” In The Necklace of the Pleiades: Studies in Persian Literature Presented to Heshmat Moayyad on his 80th Birthday, edited by Lewis, Franklin and Sharma, Sunil, 49–62. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Press and Purdue University Press, 2007. Reprint. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Davis, Dick. Sunset of Empire: Stories from the Shahnameh of Ferdowsi. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: Mage, 2004.Google Scholar
Dīnawarī, Abū Hanīfa Ahmad ibn Dāwūd al-. al-Akhbār al-Tiwāl. Cairo: Wizārat al-Thaqāfa wa-l-Irshād al-Qawmī al-Iqlīm al-Janūbī, al-Idāra al-ʻĀmma li-l-Thāqafa, 1960. Translated into Persian as Akhbār al-tevāl, by Mahmud, Mahdavi-Dāmghāni. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney, 1364/1985.Google Scholar
Ferdowsi, Abu'l-Qāsem. Shahnameh. Edited by Khaleghi-Motlagh, Djalal. 8 vols. New York: Bibliotheca Persica, 1987–2008. (Cited as SN in the notes by vol:page, line no.)Google Scholar
Farraxvmart î, Vahrâmân. Book of a Thousand Judgements: A Sasanian Law Book [Mâdayân î hazâr dâdestân]. Edited, transcribed, and translated from Middle Persian to Russian by Anahit, Perikhanian. English translation by Nina, Garsoian. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda, 1997.Google Scholar
Javānshir, F. M. Hamāseh-ye Dād: Bahsi dar Mohtavā-ye Siāsi-ye Shāhnāmeh-ye Ferdowsi. Tehran: Enteshārāt-e Hezb-e Tudeh-ye Irān, 1359/1980.Google Scholar
Khaleghi-Motlagh, Djalal. “Daqīqī, Abū Mansūr Aḥmad.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica 6/6, pp. 661–662. Accessed August 10, 2013. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/daqiqi-abu-mansur-ahmad-Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Philip. “Cosmogony and Cosmology i. In Zoroastrianism/Mazdaism.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica 5/3, pp. 503–507. Accessed August 10, 2013. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cosmogony-Google Scholar
Meisami, Julie Scott. “The Past in Service of the Present: Two Views of History in Medieval Persia.” Poetics Today 14, no. 2. Cultural Processes in Muslim and Arab Societies: Medieval and Early Modern Periods (Summer 1993): 247–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nihāyat al-Arab fī Akhbār al-Furs wa-l-ʻArab. Edited by Mohammad-Taqi, āneshpazhuh. Tehran: Anjoman-e Āsār va Mafākher-e Farhangi, 1375/1996.Google Scholar
Pourshariati, Parvaneh. “Hamza al-Iṣfahānī and Sasanid Historical Geography of Sinī Mulūk al-‘Arḍ wa'l-Anbīyā.” In Des Indo-Grecs aux Sassanides: Données pour l'Histoire et la Géographie Historique, edited by Gyselen, Rika, 111–139. Res Orientales 17. Bures-sur-Yvette: Groupe pour l’Étude de la Civilisation du Moyen-Orient, 2007.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. A History of Muslim Historiography. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1968.Google Scholar
Skjaervø, Prods Oktor. “Marriage ii. Next of Kin.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica, online version, 2013. Accessed August 15, 2013. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/marriage-next-of-kinGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli-Targhi, Mohamad. “Contested Memories: Narrative Structures and Allegorical Meanings of Iran's Pre-Islamic History,” Iranian Studies 29, no. 1/2 (Winter–Spring 1996): 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tārikh-e Sistān (ta'lif dar hodud-e 445–725). Edited by Mohammad-Taqi, Bahār. Tehran: Ketābkhāneh-ye Zavvār, 1314/1935.Google Scholar