Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T02:58:34.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Decolonisation of the Pacific Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Robert Aldrich
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the end of the Second World War, the islands of Polynesia, Melanesia and Micronesia were all under foreign control. The Netherlands retained West New Guinea even while control of the rest of the Dutch East Indies slipped away, while on the other side of the South Pacific, Chile held Easter Island. Pitcairn, the Gilbert and Ellice Islands, Fiji and the Solomon Islands comprised Britain's Oceanic empire, in addition to informal overlordship of Tonga. France claimed New Caledonia, the French Establishments in Oceania (soon renamed French Polynesia) and Wallis and Futuna. The New Hebrides remained an Anglo-French condominium; Britain, Australia and New Zealand jointly administered Nauru. The United States' territories included older possessions – the Hawaiian islands, American Samoa and Guam – and the former Japanese colonies of the Northern Marianas, Mar-shall Islands and Caroline Islands administered as a United Nations trust territory. Australia controlled Papua and New Guinea (PNG), as well as islands in the Torres Strait and Norfolk Island; New Zealand had Western Samoa, the Cook Islands, Niue and Tokelau. No island group in Oceania, other than New Zealand, was independent.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 24 , Issue 3-4 , November 2000, pp. 173 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Notes

1 Recent British writers give short shrift to independence of Oceania, which is not mentioned in Cain, P.J. and Hopkins, A.G., British Imperialism: Crisis and Deconstruction, 1914–1990 (London 1993),Google Scholar or Lapping, B., End of Empire (London 1989).Google ScholarJudd, D., Empire (London 1996),Google Scholar mentions in passing only Fiji and Tonga (p. 385), while James, L., The Rise and Fall of the British Empire (London 1994),Google Scholar discusses them not at all. Porter, B., The Lion's Share (London 1984),Google Scholar after covering decolonisation elsewhere, adds, ‘And so it went on into the “seventies” […]’ naming Fiji (but no other South Pacific possessions) among small colonies. Studies of France are seldom more detailed; Betts, R.F., France and Decolonisation, 1900–1962 (Macmillan 1991),CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Bouvier, J., Girault, R. and Thobie, J., Imperialisme a la francaise (Paris 1986),Google Scholar end the story with Algeria. Recent histories give cursory attention to the post-war decades, appending a few pages on the remaining territories and events in New Caledonia; see, e.g., Thobie, J. et al., Histoire de la France coloniale, 1914–1990 (Paris 1990),Google Scholar and Binoche-Guedra, J., La France d'outre-mer, 1815–1962 (Paris 1992)Google Scholar.

2 Campbell, I.C., A History of the Pacific Islands (St Lucia, Qld, 1989) chapter 15Google Scholar; Howe, K.R., Kiste, R. and Lai, B. V. eds, Tides of History: The Pacific Islands in the Twentieth Century (Canberra 1994)Google Scholar.

3 An exception is Denoon, D. ed., Emerging from Empire? Decolonisation in the Pacific (Canberra 1997),Google Scholar where Firth, S.Google Scholar, ‘The Rise and Fall of Decolonisation in the Pacific’ in: ibid., 10–21, provides a summary.

4 Larmour, P., e.g., examines negotiations on status, separatism and free association in ‘The Decolonisation of the Pacific’ and focusses, Y. Ghai on ‘Constitutional Issues in the Transition to Independence’ in: Crocombe, R. and Ali, A. eds, Foreign Forces in Pacific Politics (Suva 1983) 1–23 and 24–65, respectivelyGoogle Scholar.

5 Exceptions include P. Hasluck, L.W. Johnson, K. Mara, A.D. Patel, and M. Somare. On Hasluck, minister in charge of Australia's external territories, see Porter, R., Paul Hasluck: A Political Biography (Perth 1993)Google Scholar; on Mara and Patel, Johnson and Somare, see notes 23, 29 and 30, below.

6 Spate, O.H.K., author of a masterful three-volume study of The Pacific since Magellan (Canberra 1979–1988),Google Scholar was a government consultant during the decolonisation of Fiji; J.L. Davidson, one of the founders of a new ‘school’ of Pacific island history in the 1940s, was involved in the decolonisation of Western Samoa.

7 For an exploration of alternatives to independence, see Aldrich, R. and Connell, J., The Last Colonies (Cambridge 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Larmour, P., ‘Whose Initiative: Getting Out or Pushing Out?’ in: Denoon, ed., Emerging from Empire?, 204–208Google Scholar.

9 Darwin, John, The End of the British Empire: The Historical Debate (Oxford 1991)Google Scholar.

10 Aldrich, R. and Connell, J.,France's Overseas Frontier: Departements et Territoires d'Outre-Mer (Cambridge 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Macdonald, B., ‘Decolonisation and “Good” Governance: Precedents and Continuities’ in: Denoon, ed., Emerging from Empire?, 1–9Google Scholar.

12 Quoted in Bedford, R., Perceptions of a Future for Melanesia (Christchurch 1980) 42, 40Google Scholar.

13 Quoted in ibid., 34.

14 The Brazzaville declaration of 1943 stated: ‘The goals of […] colonisation accomplished by France […] preclude any idea of autonomy’ (Quoted in Aldrich, R., Greater France (London 1996) 280.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 West, F., Political Advancement in the South Pacific (Oxford 1961),Google Scholar compares Fiji, French Polynesia and American Samoa.

16 Brookfield, H.C., Colonialism, Development and Independence: The Case of the Melanesian Islands in the South Pacific (Cambridge 1972) 110Google Scholar.

17 Lenormand, M., ‘Decolonisation ratee — Independance avortee’ fournal de la Societe des Oceanistes 92–93 (1991) 141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Regnault, J.-M., Te Metua: L'Echec d'un nationalisme tahitien (Papeete 1996)Google Scholar.

19 Bell, R., Last Among Equals: Hawaiian Statehood and American Politics (Honolulu 1984).Google Scholar Cf. Kiste, R.C., ‘United States’ in: Howe, Kiste and Lai, eds, Tides of History, 227–257Google Scholar.

20 Lijphart, A., The Trauma of Decolonization: The Dutch and West New Guinea (New Haven 1966),Google Scholar and on subsequent Indonesian policy, Gietzelt, D., ‘The Indonesianization of West Papua’ Oceania 59 (1989) 201–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Davidson, J.W., Samoa Mo Samoa: The Emergence of the Independent State of Western Samoa (Melbourne 1967) 410Google Scholar; Liua'ana, B., ‘Who Made Samoa Independent?’ in: Denoon, ed., Emerging from Empire?, 40–46Google Scholar.

22 Pollock, N., ‘Nauru: Decolonising, Recolonising — but Never a Colony’ in: Denoon, ed., Emerging from Empire?, 102–106Google Scholar and, on British policy generally, Macdonald, B., ‘Britain’ in: Howe, Kiste and Lai, eds, Tides of History, 170–194Google Scholar.

23 See Lai, B.V., Broken Waves: A History of the Fiji Islands in the Twentieth Century (Honolulu 1992),Google Scholar and A Vision for Change: AD Patel and the Politics of Fiji (Canberra 1997)Google Scholar; Mara, K., The Pacific Way: A Memoir (Honolulu 1997)Google Scholar.

24 Macdonald, B., Cinderellas of the Empire: Towards a History of Kiribati and Tuvalu (Canberra 1982)Google Scholar.

25 Bennett, J.A., Wealth of the Solomons: A History of a Pacific Archipelago, 1800–1973 (Honolulu 1987)Google Scholar.

26 ‘Anglophone’ and ‘Francophone’ refer to cultural identification rather than linguistic training; see Miles, W.F.S., Bridging Mental Boundaries in a Postcolonial Microcosm: Identity and Development in Vanuatu (Honolulu 1998)Google Scholar.

27 Macdonald, , Cinderellas, 222Google Scholar.

28 Bennett, , Wealth of the Solomons, 321Google Scholar.

29 Quoted in Johnson, L.W., Colonial Sunset: Australia and Papua New Guinea 1970–74 (St Lucia, Qld 1983) 52–53Google Scholar.

30 Waiko, J.D., A Short History of Papua New Guinea (Melbourne 1993)Google Scholar; Downs, I., The Australian Trusteeship: Papua New Guinea 1945–1975 (Canberra 1980)Google Scholar; Wesley-Smith, T., ‘Australia and New Zealand’ in: Howe, Kiste and Lai, eds, Tides of History, 195–226.Google Scholar Cf. Somare, Michael, Sana (Port Moresby 1975)Google Scholar.

31 Aldrich, R., France and the South Pacific since 1940 (London 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Toullelan, P.-Y. and Gille, B., Le Manage franco-tahitien: Histoire de Tahiti du XVIIIe si'ecle a nos jours (Papeete 1992)Google Scholar; Sem, G., Introduction au statut juridique de la Polynesie francaise (Papeete 1996)Google Scholar.

33 Aldrich, France and the South Pacific since 1940.

34 Hezel, F.X., Strangers in Their Own Land: A Century of Colonial Rule in the Caroline and Marshall Islands (Honolulu 1995)Google Scholar; McPhetres, A., ‘Northern Mariana Islands: US Common-wealth’ in: Crocombe, and Ali, eds, ForeignForces in Pacific Politics, 146–160;Google ScholarStatham, Robert, ‘The US Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: A Paradox of “Independent” Dependency’ in: Denoon, ed., Emerging from Empire?, 90–101;Google ScholarRoff, S.R., Overreaching in Paradise: United States Policy in Palau since 1945 (Juneau 1991)Google Scholar.

35 Ada, J.F., ‘Time for Change’ and Guerrero, W.P. Leon and Salas, J.C., ‘Issues for the United States Pacific Insular Areas: The Case of Guam’ Isla 3 (1995) 129–137Google Scholar and 139–145, respectively.

36 Michal, E.J., ‘American Samoa or Eastern Samoa? The Potential for American Samoa to Become Freely Associated with the United States’ The Contemporary Pacific 4 (1992) 137–160;Google ScholarFaleomavaega, E.F.H., Navigating the Future: A Samoan Perspective on U.S.-Pacific Relations (Suva 1995)Google Scholar.

37 Boyd, M., ‘New Zealand and the Other Pacific Islands’ in: Sinclair, K. ed., The Oxford Illustrated History of New Zealand (Oxford 1996) 295–322;Google ScholarHenderson, J., ‘Micro-states and the Politics of Association: The Future of New Zealand's Constitutional Links with the Cook Islands and Tokelau’ in: Institute of Pacific Studies ed., New Politics in the South Pacific (Suva 1994) 99–112Google Scholar.

38 Chapman, T.M., The Decolonisation of Nine (Wellington 1976)Google Scholar.

39 McCall, G., Rapanui: Tradition and Survival on Easter Island (Honolulu 1994)Google Scholar.

40 House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Islands in the Sun: The Legal Regimes of Australia's External Territories and the Jervis Bay Territory (Canberra 1991)Google Scholar.

41 Mullins, S., ‘Decolonising Torres Strait: A Moderate Proposal for 2001’ in: Denoon, ed., Emerging from Empire?, 142–150Google Scholar.

42 Connell, J., Sovereignty and Survival: Island Microstales in the Third World (Sydney 1988)Google Scholar.

43 Petersen, G., ‘Decolonisation: The HighestForm of Imperialism’ in: Denoon, ed., Emerging from Empire?, 73–89Google Scholar.

44 Macdonald, , Cinderellas, 260Google Scholar.

45 Quoted in Lai, , Broken Waves, 195Google Scholar.

46 Quoted in Chapman, , The Decolonisation of Niue, 56Google Scholar.

47 Goldsworthy, D., ‘British Territories and Australian Mini-Imperialism in the 1950s’ Australian Journal of Politics and History 41 (1995) 356–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Quentin-Baxter, A., ‘Sustained Autonomy — An Alternative Political Status for Small Islands?’ Victoria University of'Wellington Law Review 24 (1994) 1–18Google Scholar.

49 Nadile, R.N., ‘Decolonising the Intellectual Mind-Set: The Case of Papua New Guinea’ in: Denoon, ed., Emerging from Empire?, 176Google Scholar.