Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:49:21.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varietal differences in growth characteristics in sugar cane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. Singh and
P. N. Gururaja Rao
S. Singh
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Physiology, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, India
P. N. Gururaja Rao
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Physiology, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, India
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In sugar cane, investigations made earlier (Singh & Gururaja Rao, 1985) have shown that high-yielding varieties have higher net assimilation rate than low-yielding types. Similarly, differences in progeny means for relative growth rate and net assimilation rate have been reported by George (1965). In other crops also, varietal differences in leaf area index and net assimilation rate have been reported (Watson, 1947). It appears that in this crop, limited attempts have been made to study all the growth characteristics. This paper describes the differences in most of the growth characteristics in six sugar-cane varieties.

Information

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 1987, pp. 245 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

George, E. F. (1965). Physiological growth attributes of Saccharum clones and their progenies. Annals of Botany, N.S.. 29, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. E. (1975). Relation of photosynthetic rates and leaf and canopy characters to sugarcane. Crop Science 15, 671–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J. & Jarvis, P. G. (1971). Methods of growth analysis. In Plant Photosynthetic Production: Manual Methods (ed. Sestak, Z., Catsky, J. and Jarvis, P. G.), pp. 343–384. The Hague: Dr W. Junk.Google Scholar
Raheja, P. C. (1946). Growth studies on Saccharum officinarum. I. Varietal series. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16, 113–139.Google Scholar
Singh, S. & Gururaja Rao, P. N. (1985). Varietal differences in the net assimilation rate. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 55 (5), 365–366.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1947). Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. I. Variation in NAR and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Annals of Botany N.S. 11, 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1952). The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy 4, 101–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar