Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T06:52:07.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Double-Barrier Parisian Options

Part of:Markov processesStochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Angelos Dassios and
Shanle Wu
Angelos Dassios*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
Shanle Wu*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK.
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper we study the excursion time of a Brownian motion with drift outside a corridor by using a four-state semi-Markov model. In mathematical finance, these results have an important application in the valuation of double-barrier Parisian options. We subsequently obtain an explicit expression for the Laplace transform of its price.

Keywords

Excursion timefour-state semi-Markov modeldouble-barrier Parisian optionLaplace transform

MSC classification

Secondary:60J65: Brownian motion60G44: Martingales with continuous parameter60J25: Continuous-time Markov processes on general state spaces

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2011, pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2011 

References

[1] Bertoin, J. (1997). Lévy Processes (Camb. Tracts Math. 121). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[2] Borodin, A. N. and Salminen, P. (1996). Handbook of Brownian Motion—Facts and Formulae. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
[3] Breiman, L. (1968). Probability. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
[4] Chesney, M., Jeanblanc-Picque, M. and Yor, M. (1997). Brownian excursions and Parisian barrier options. Adv. Appl. Prob. 29, 165–184.Google Scholar
[5] Chung, K. L. (1976). {Excursions in Brownian motion.} Ark. Math. 14, 155–177.Google Scholar
[6] Dassios, A. and Wu, S. (2010). Two-sided Parisian option with single barrier. Finance Stoch. 14, 473–494.Google Scholar
[7] Davis, M. H. A. (1994). Markov Models and Optimization. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
[8] Labart, C. and Lelong, J. (2005). Pricing Parisian options. Tech. Rep., ENPC. Available at http://cermics.enpc.fr/reports/CERMICS-2005/CERMICS-2005-294.pdf.Google Scholar
[9] Revuz, D. and Yor, M. (1999). Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[10] Rogers, L. C. G. (1989). A guided tour through excursions. Bull. London Math. Soc. 21, 305–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Rogers, L. C. G. and Williams, D. (1987). Diffusions, Markov Processes and Martingales, Vol. 2. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[12] Rogers, L. C. G. and Williams, D. (1994). Diffusions, Markov Processes and Martingales, Vol. 1, 2nd edn. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
[13] Schröder, M. (2003). Brownian excursions and Parisian barrier options: a note. J. Appl. Prob. 40, 855–864.Google Scholar
[14] Yor, M. (1997). Some Aspects of Brownian Motion. Part II. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar