Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T20:13:28.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantile sensitivity estimation for dependent sequences

Part of: Multivariate analysis Probabilistic methods, simulation and stochastic differential equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2016

Guangxin Jiang  and
Michael C. Fu
Guangxin Jiang*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Michael C. Fu*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
*
*Postal address: Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Email address: guajiang@cityu.edu.hk
** Postal address: Robert H. Smith School of Business and Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper we estimate quantile sensitivities for dependent sequences via infinitesimal perturbation analysis, and prove asymptotic unbiasedness, weak consistency, and a central limit theorem for the estimators under some mild conditions. Two common cases, the regenerative setting and ϕ-mixing, are analyzed further, and a new batched estimator is constructed based on regenerative cycles for regenerative processes. Two numerical examples, the G/G/1 queue and the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, are given to show the effectiveness of the estimator.

Keywords

QuantileMonte Carlo simulationsensitivity analysisregenerative processϕ-mixing

MSC classification

Primary: 62H12: Estimation
Secondary: 65C05: Monte Carlo methods

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 715 - 732
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2016 

References

Asmussen, S. (2003).Applied Probability and Queues, 2nd edn. Springer,New York.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. D. (2005).Basic properties of strong mixing conditions. A survey and some open questions.Prob. Surv. 2,104–177.Google Scholar
Deo, C. M. (1975).A functional central limit theorem for stationary random fields.Ann. Prob. 3,708–715.Google Scholar
Doukhan, P. (1994).Mixing: Properties and Examples,Springer,New York.Google Scholar
Fu, M C. (2006). Gradient estimation. In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Simulation, eds S. G. Henderson and B. L. Nelson, Elsevier,Amsterdam, pp.575–616.Google Scholar
Fu, M. C., Hong, L. J. and Hu, J. Q. (2009).Conditional Monte Carlo estimation of quantile sensitivities.Manag. Sci. 55,2019–2027.Google Scholar
Glasserman, F. (1993).Regenerative derivatives of regenerative sequences.Adv. Appl. Prob. 25,116–139.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, P. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1984).Quantile estimation in dependent sequences.Operat. Res. 3,185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, C. H. (1990).A Bahadur-type representation for empirical quantiles of a large class of stationary, possibly infinite-variance, linear processes.Ann. Statist. 18,1188–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, H-C. and Hsing, T. (1996).On the asymptotic expansion of the empirical process of long-memory moving averages.Ann. Statist. 24,992–1024.Google Scholar
Hong, L. J. (2009).Estimating quantile sensitivities.Operat. Res. 57,118–130.Google Scholar
Iglehart, D. L. (1976).Simulating stable stochastic systems. VI. Quantile estimation..J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 23,347–360.Google Scholar
Jiang, G. and Fu, M. C. (2015).Technical note—on estimating quantile sensitivities via infinitesimal perturbation analysis.Operat. Res. 63,435–441.Google Scholar
Jiang, G.,Fu, M. C. and Xu, C. (2014). Bias reduction in estimating quantile sensitivities. In Proceedings of the 19th IFAC World Congress, eds E. Boje and X. Xia,IFAC, pp. 10463–10468.Google Scholar
Liu, G. and Hong, L. J. (2009).Kernel estimation of quantile sensitivities..Naval Res. Logistics 56,511–525.Google Scholar
Meketon, M. S. and Heidelberger, P. (1982).A renewal theoretic approach to bias reduction in regenerative simulations.Manag. Sci. 28,173–181.Google Scholar
Seila, A. F. (1982).A batching approach to quantile estimation in regenerative simulations.Manag. Sci. 28,573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, P. K. (1968).Asymptotic normality of sample quantiles for m-dependent processes.Ann. Math. Statist. 39,1724–1730.Google Scholar
Sen, P. K. (1972).On the Bahadur representation of sample quantiles for sequences of ϕ-mixing random variable.!J. Multivariate Anal. 2,77–95.Google Scholar
Serfling, R. J. (1980).Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics.John Wiley,New York.Google Scholar
Steiger, N. M. and Wilson, J. R. (2001).Convergence properties of the batch means method for simulation output analysis..INFORMS J. Comput. 13,277–293.Google Scholar
Suri, R. and Zazanis, M. A. (1988).Perturbation analysis gives strongly consistent sensitivity estimates for the M/G/1 queue..Manag. Sci. 34,39–64.Google Scholar
Volk-Makarewicz, W. and Heidergott, B. (2012).Sensitivity analysis of quantiles.AENORM 20,26–31.Google Scholar