Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T22:24:55.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marxism in Thai Historical Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Craig J. Reynolds and
Hong Lysa
Get access

Abstract

Analyses of Thai political economy since World War II have sought to define the stages of Thai social evolution from earliest times to the present and to determine whether or not the Bowring Treaty of 1855 and the 1932 coup mark changes in the social formation and/or the mode of production. Over the past decade, as a consequence of political change in the mid-1970s, a new generation of historians has rejuvenated Marxist methodology, using it to pry the chronicles and archives away from royalist and nationalist myth-making concerns, to dismantle the court-centered historiography, and to erect a new historical paradigm for the late twentieth century.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , November 1983, pp. 77 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

List of References

Osamu, Akagi. 1978. “Research Note and Data on ‘Pocketbook’ Publication in Thailand, 1973–1976.” South East Asian Studies 16, 3:473–523.Google Scholar
Rabibhadana, Akin. 1969. The Social Organization of Thai Society in the Early Bangkok Period, 1782–1873. Southeast Asia Program Data Paper No. 74. Ithaca: Cornell University, Department of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Akso¸nsan. 1951. 3, 1(April).Google Scholar
Siamwalla, Ammar. 1976. “So¸ngpratya büanglang kanthamngan kho¸ng naksetthasat” [The two philosophies behind the work of economists], Sangkhomsat parithat 14, 3–4:14–49.Google Scholar
Ganjanaphan, Anan. 1981. “Withikankhian prawattisat kho¸ng ĉhit phumisak” [Jit Poumisak's historical method]. Ruam botkhwam prawattisat [Collected articles on history] 3:54–88.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict R. O'G. 1977. “Withdrawal Symptoms: Social and Cultural Aspects of the October 6 Coup.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 9, 3:13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict R. 1978. “Studies of the Thai State: The State of Thai Studies.” In The Study of Thailand: Analyses of Knowledge, Approaches, and Prospects in Anthropology, Art History, Economics, History and Political Science, ed. Ayal, Eliezer B., 193–247. Papers in international Studies, Southeast Asia Series, No. 54. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University, Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Aphaphirom, Anut. 1979a. Thritsadi prawattisat lae sangkhom [Historical and social theory]. Bangkok: Klum Nangnuan.Google Scholar
Aphaphirom, Anut. 1979b. Tünthoet … yaowachon [Youth, awake!]. Bangkok: Klum Boekfa.Google Scholar
Kamutphitsamai, Atcharaphgn. 1981. “Kabot rç so¸ 130: süksa ko¸rani kanpatirup thangkanpokkhro¸ng lae klum thahanmai” [The 1912 Revolt: A study of governmental reform and the “new military” group]. M.A. thesis, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Bell, Peter. 1982. “Western Conceptions of Thai Society: The Politics of American Scholarship.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 12, 1:61–74.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Howard R. 1981. “Marxist Historiography and the Methodology of Research Programs.” History and Theory, Beiheft 20:424–49.Google Scholar
Samudavanija, Chai-anan. 1976. Sakdina kap phatthanakan kho¸ng sangkhomthai [Śaktina and the development of Thai society]. Bangkok: Namaksçnkanphim.Google Scholar
Kasetsiri, Charnvit. 1979. “Thai Historiography from Ancient Times to the Modern Period.” In Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia, ed. Reid, A. J. S. and Marr, D. G., 156–70. Hong Kong: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Nartsupha, Chatthip, comp. 1972. Udomkan kap sangkhomthai [Thai ideology and society]. Bangkok: Social Science Association of Thailand.Google Scholar
Nartsupha, Chatthip. 1977. “The Economic Thought of Phraya Suriyanuwat.” In The Review of Social Science: A Collection of Articles by Thai Scholars, ed. Dhiravegin, Likhit, 116–37. Bangkok: Social Science Association of Thailand.Google Scholar
Chatthip Nartsupha and Suthy Prasartset, eds. 1977. Socio-economic Institutions and Cultural Change in Siam, 1851–1910: A Documentary Survey. Perspective Series No. 4. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Nartsupha, Chatthip, ed. 1980. Wiwatthanakan thunniyomthai [The evolution of Thai capitalism]. Bangkok: Faculties of Economics, Chulalongkorn and Thammasat Universities.Google Scholar
Nartsupha, Chatthip et al. 1981. Setthasat kap prawattisatthai [Economics and Thai history]. Bangkok: Sangsan.Google Scholar
Nartsupha, Chatthip, Prasartset, Suthy, and Chenvidhakarn, Montri, eds. [1978] 1981. The Political Economy of Siam, 1851–1910 and The Political Economy of Siam, 1910–1932. 2 vols. Bangkok: Social Science Association of Thailand.Google Scholar
Vaddhanaphuti, Chayan. 1981. “Thai Social Formation: Current Debates.” Southeast Asian Chronicle 80:22–24.Google Scholar
Yông-ho, Ch'oe. 1981. “Reinterpreting Traditional History in North Korea.” Journal of Asian Studies 40, 3:503–23.Google Scholar
Rattayothin, Decha [pseud.]. [1950] 1979. Wiwatthanakan kho¸ng sangkhom [The evolution of society]. Bangkok: Prawattisat.Google Scholar
Dirlik, Arif. 1978. Revolution and History: The Origins of Marxist Historiography in China, 1919–1937. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, David. 1978. Thailand: Origins of Military Rule. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Flood, E. Thadeus. 1975. “The Thai Left Wing in Historical Context.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 7, 2:55–67.Google Scholar
Flood, E. Thadeus. 1977. “Jit Phumisak: Profile of a Revolutionary Intellectual.” Indochina Chronicle 54:12–14.Google Scholar
Girling, John L. S. 1981. Thailand: Society and Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin J. 1980. Review of Chatthip, Suthy, Montri, eds., 1981. Journal of Contemporary Asia 10, 3:293–99.Google Scholar
Lysa, Hong. 1981. “The Evolution of the Thai Economy in the Early Bangkok Period and Its Historiography.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Poumisak, Jit [Somsamai Srisudravarna, pseud.]. 1957. “Chomna khgng sakdinathai nai patĉhuban” [The real face of Thai śaktina today]. In Nitisat 2500 chabap rap sattawatmai [The Faculty of Law yearbook of 2500 to greet the new century], 356–491. Bangkok: Faculty of Law, Thammasat University.Google Scholar
Poumisak, Jit. 1976. Khwampenma kho¸ng kham sayam thai lao lae khqrn lae laksana thang sangkhom kho¸ng chüchonchat [Etymology of the terms Siam, Thai, Lao, and Kho¸m and the social characteristics of nationalities]. Bangkok: Textbook Project for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Social Science Association of Thailand.Google Scholar
Poumisak, Jit. 1977. Reprint of Jit, 1957. Newark, N.J.: Chomrom nangsüthai samakkhi.Google Scholar
Poumisak, Jit [Thiphakgn, pseud.]e. [1957] 1972. Sinlapa phüa chiwit sinlapa phüa prachachon [Art for life, art for the people]. Bangkok: Nangsü. Reprinted 1978. Bangkok: Tonmakham.Google Scholar
Poumisak, Jit. 1979. Reprint of Jit 1957. Bangkok: Saeng-ngoen.Google Scholar
Poumisak, Jit. 1981. Ongkan chaengnam lae kho¸khitmai nai prawattisatthai lumnam ĉhaophraya [The oath of allegiance and new ideas on Thai history in the Chaophraya River basin]. Bangkok: Duangkamon.Google Scholar
Poumisak, Jit. 1982a. Kho¸thetĉhing waduai chonchatkho¸m [Facts concerning the Kho¸m nationality]. Bangkok: Maingam.Google Scholar
Poumisak, Jit. 1982b. Tamnan haeng nakho¸nwat [Conversations about Angkor Wat]. Bangkok: Maingam.Google Scholar
Johnston, David B. 1975. “Rural Society and the Rice Economy in Thailand.” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Wongtrangan, Kanok. 1981. “Communist Revolutionary Process: A Study of the Communist Party of Thailand.” Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Khaoĉhaturat (Bangkok). Dec. 26, 1981.Google Scholar
Pramot, Khükrit. 1961. Farang sakdina [European śaktina]. Bangkok: Kaona.Google Scholar
Pramot, Khükrit et al. 1975. Prawattisat lae kanmüang nangsü anprako¸p ivichaphünthan arayathamthai [History and politics: A reader concerning the fundamentals of Thai civilization]. Bangkok: Thammasat University.Google Scholar
Klumsüksa-itsara, [Independent Study Group]. 1981. Chiknakak sangkhomthai [Tearing off the mask of Thai society]. Bangkok: Klumsüksa-itsara.Google Scholar
sayamniko¸n, Ko¸ngbannathikan [Siamniko¸n Editorial Staff]. 1979. Khonpa [People of the jungle]. Bangkok: Athit.Google Scholar
sayamniko¸n, Ko¸ngbannathikan [Siamniko¸n Editorial Staff]. 1980a. Khonpa khün müang [The jungle people return to the city]. Bangkok: Athit.Google Scholar
sayamniko¸n, Ko¸ngbannathikan [Siamniko¸n Editorial Staff]. 1980b. Pho¸ kho¸ tho¸ bon sathan kanpatiwat [The CPT: Set for revolution]. Bangkok: Athit.Google Scholar
Suwannathatphian, Ko¸pküa. 1976. “Kankhian prawattisat baepchatniyom phiĉharana luang wiĉhit watthakan” [Nationalist historical writing: An examination of Luang Wiĉhit Watthakan]. Warasan thammasat 6, 1:148–80.Google Scholar
Chunnawan, Kraisak. 1979. “Khwamdo¸iphatthana lae kanplianplaeng nai chonnabot” [Underdevelopment and changes in rural society]. In Thiralük 23 tula [In remembrance of 23 October], 42–49. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Saipradit, Kulap. [1950] 1974. Pratya kho¸ng latthimaksit [The philosophy of Marxism]. Chiengmai: Naewruamsüksa, Chiengmai University.Google Scholar
Saipradit, Kulap. [1954] 1978. Introd. Anan Ganjanaphan. Kamnoet kho¸ng khrçpkhrua [The origins of the family] and Rabiap sangkhom kho¸ng manut [The human social system]. 2 vols. Bangkok: Phiphi.Google Scholar
Dilokkawitthayarat, Lae. 1979. “‘Witthikanphalit baep esia’ kap ngüankhai thang prawattisat haeng khwamdoiphatthana kho¸ng sangkhomthai” [‘The Asiatic mode of production’ and historical factors in the underdevelopment of Thai society]. Warasan thammasat 9, 1:87–98.Google Scholar
McBeth, John. 1982. “In from the Cold (2).” Far Eastern Economic Review, Sept. 17, 1982.Google Scholar
McLane, Charles B. 1966. Soviet Strategies in Southeast Asia: An Exploration of Eastern Policy Under Lenin and Stalin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Ernest. 1971. The Formation of the Economic Thought of Karl Marx, 1843 to Capital. London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Matuphum (Bangkok). Jan. 24, 1982.Google Scholar
Morell, David, and Samudavanija, Chai-anan. 1981. Political Conflict in Thailand: Reform, Reaction, Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.Google Scholar
Bo¸yang, Müang [pseud.]. 1980. Botphleng haeng rungarun [A song of youth]. Bangkok: Chomromnangsü tonkla.Google Scholar
Bo¸yang, Müang [pseud.]. 1981. “Hetkan thi kha thukklaothot” [The incident in which I was denounced]. Loknangsü [Book world] 4, 12:53–62.Google Scholar
Bo¸yang, Müang et al. 1980. Dang thian phu tho¸ngthae kae khon ruam botkhwam kiawkap ĉhit phumisak [As a candle shining forth for all mankind: Collected articles on Jit Poumisak]. Bangkok: Puifai.Google Scholar
Aeusrivongse, Nidhi. 1981. “Suntho¸nphu mahakawi kratumphi” [Sunthorn Phu: The great bourgeois poet]. Paper presented at seminar on The Social History of Early Bangkok, Sinlapakon University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Aeusrivongse, Nidhi. 1982. Watthanatham kratumphi kap wannakam ton rattanakosin [Bourgeois culture and literary art in the early Bangkok period]. Academic Papers Series No. 20. Bangkok: Thai Khadi Research Institute, Thammasat University.Google Scholar
Paĉharayasan (Bangkok). 1981. 8, 3(June-JuIy).Google Scholar
Parithatsan (Bangkok). Nov. 1981:8–26; Dec. 1981:56–59.Google Scholar
Changkaew, Phatcharaphon and Sakunchokchai, Chukiat. 1981. “Nithi iawsiwong kap prawattisatthai” [Nidhi Aeusrivongse and Thai history], Warasan thammasat 10, 2:58–73.Google Scholar
Bua-çn, Phin [Amnat Yutthawiwat, pseud.]. 1975. Wiĉhai sangkhomthai [Researching Thai society]. Bangkok: Prachamit.Google Scholar
Hantrakun, Phçnphen. 1976a. “Prawattisat nai thasana khçng samnak maksit” [History from the perspective of the Marxist school]. In Pratya prawattisat [Philosophies of history], ed. Kasetsiri, Charnvit and Sawatsi, Suchat, 273–303. 2d ed.Bangkok: Praphansan.Google Scholar
Hantrakun, Phçnphen. 1976b. Review of Chai-anan, , 1976. Warasan thammasat 6, 2:141–50.Google Scholar
Piamphongsan, Pricha. 1979. “Rabop setthakit sangkhomthai küngmüangkhün küngsakdina” [The Thai socioeconomic system: Semicolonial, semifeudal]. In Thiralük 23 tula [In remembrance of 23 October], 52–57. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Piamphongsan, Pricha and Ramitanon, Chalatchai. 1981. Latthimak lae sangkhomniyom [Marxism and socialism]. Bangkok: Khletthai.Google Scholar
Bunsü, Pridi. 1981. Khwamapĉhon kho¸ng latthimak [The poverty of Marxism]. Bangkok: Munnithi Komonkhimthong.Google Scholar
Ratchakitcbanubeksa [Royal Thai Government Gazette]. 1977. Special Issues 94, 18:1–12; 94, 97:3–16.Google Scholar
Burawat, Samak. 1954. Panya [Intellect]. Bangkok: Ruamsan.Google Scholar
Burawat, Samak. 1970. Witthayasatmai kap phrasi-an [The new science and the Metteya Buddha]. Bangkok: Phraephitthaya.Google Scholar
Rangsarit, San. [1961] 1979. Wiwatthanakan haeng sangkhomsayam [The evolution of Siamese society]. Bangkok: Sahasüksaphan.Google Scholar
Piriyarangsan, Sangsit. 1980. “Thai Bureaucratic Capitalism, 1932–1960.” Master's thesis, English Language Program, Thammasat University.Google Scholar
Piriyarangsan, Sangsit. 1981. “Thunniyom khunnangthai 2475–2503” [Thai bureaucratic cap italism, 1932–1960]. Paĉharayasan 8, 3:54–63.Google Scholar
Samakrakan, Sanit. 1976. Review of Chai-anan, 1976. Sangkbomsat parithat 14, 1:141–46.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 1977. Marxism and the Question of the Asiatic Mode of Production. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sakkriangkrai, Sirilak. 1980a. Tonkamnoet chonchannaithun nai prathetthai pho¸ so¸ 2398–2453 [The origins of the capitalist class in Thailand, 1855–1910]. Bangkok: Sangsan.Google Scholar
Sirilak, Sakkriangkrai, ed. 1980b. Phraya suriyanuwat (koet bunnak) naksetthasat khonraek kho¸ng müangthai [Phraya Suriyanuwat (Koet Bunnag): Thailand's first economist]. Bangkok: Thai Watthanaphanit.Google Scholar
Rakprathet, Sitthan [pseud.]. 1980. Pho¸ kho¸ tho¸ wanni [The CPT today], Bangkok: Phithakpracha.Google Scholar
Suwannasi, Somchai. 1981a. “Udomkan maksit kap ngüankhai thang prawattisat nai prathetthai” [Marxist ideology and historical conditions in Thailand]. Warasan thammasat 10, 1:112–22.Google Scholar
Suwannasi, Somchai, ed. 1981b. Ruamkho¸khian kho¸ng wo¸raphut chai-anam [Collected writings of Wo¸raphut Chai-anam]. Bangkok: Ko¸ngbannathikan Paĉharayasan.Google Scholar
Wanthana, Somkiat. 1979. “Wikkarütakan thang sangkhomsar lae kantoepto kho¸ng prawattisat baep maksit nai thotsawat 1970” [Crisis in social science and the growth of Marxist history in the 1970s]. Warasan thammasat 9, 2:105–47.Google Scholar
Wanthana, Somkiat. 1981. Sangkhomsat wiphatsawithi [Dialectical social science]. Bangkok: Wali.Google Scholar
Ĉhiamthirasakun, Somsak. 1982. “Sangkhomthai ĉhak sakdina su thunniyom” [Thai society: From ‘śaktina’ to ‘capitalist’]. Warasan thammasat 11, 2:128–64.Google Scholar
Yala, Songchai na [pseud.]. 1981. “Panha kansüksa withikanphalit kho¸ng thai annüangmaĉhak thritsadi küngmüangkhün küngsakdina” [Problems in analyzing Thai modes of production arising from the semicolonial, semifeudal theory]. Warasan setthasatkanmüang 1, 2:1–98.Google Scholar
Sawatsi, Suchat, ed. 1974. Chit phumisak nakrop kho¸ng khonrunmai [Jit Poumisak: Warrior of the new generation]. Bangkok: Social Science Association.Google Scholar
Sirimanond, Supha. [1951] 1974. Khaepitalit [Capitalism]. Bangkok: Khletthai.Google Scholar
Loetphanitchakun, Suppharat. 1976. “Rabopsakdina” [The śaktina system], Warasan thammasat 6, 1:22–38.Google Scholar
Chai-anam, Suraphong. 1974. Mak lae sangkhomniyom [Marx and socialism]. Bangkok: Khletthai.Google Scholar
Chai-anam, Suraphong. 1976. Review of Chai-anan, 1976. Sangkhomsat parithat 14, 1:146–49.Google Scholar
Suriyanuwat, Phraya. [1911] 1975. Introd. Chatthip Nartsupha. Sapsat [The science of property]. Bangkok: Phikkhaner.Google Scholar
Prasartset, Suthy. 1980. “Rabop thunniyom doirat nai prathetthai kho¸ so¸ 1932–1959” [State capitalism in Thailand, 1932–1959]. In Chatthip, éd., 1980:139–206.Google Scholar
Ĉharoenphong, Suwadi. 1979. “Patikiriya kho¸ng ratthaban phrabatsomdet phrapokklao ĉhaoyuhua tç kankhlüanwai thang khwamkhit sangkhomniyom kho¸mmiwnit (pho¸ sç 2468–2475)” [The reaction of King Phrapokklao's government to currents of Socialist and Communist thought (1925–1932)]. In Kanmüang kanpokkhro¸ngthai samaimai ruamngamuiĉhai thang prawattisat lae ratthasat [Modern Thai politics and government: Collected research works in history and political science], ed. Ĉharoenphong, Suwadi and Samudavanija, Chai-anan, 293–359. Bangkok: Social Science Association of Thailand.Google Scholar
Thonprasitphatthana, Suwadi and Menasawat, Phiphada, comps. N.d. Ruambotkhatyo¸ witthayaniphon parinyatho phanaek prawattisat khana-akso¸nsat ĉhulalongkqn maha-witthayalai [Collected abstracts of masters’ theses in history, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University]. Bangkok: Social Science Association.Google Scholar
Pharanawalai, Suwinai. 1981. Botkhlo¸ng sanoe waduai thritsadi sangkhomniyom nai ngae kho¸ng watthuniyom prawattisat [An experimental essay on socialist theory from the perspective of historical materialism]. Bangkok: Social Research Institute Book Project, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Suwit Phaithayawat. N.d. Wiwatthanakan setthakitchonnabot nai phakklang kho¸ng pratthetthai pho¸ so¸ 2394–2475 [Evolution of the rural economy in the central plains of Thailand, 1851–1932]. Bangkok: Sangsan.Google Scholar
Shigeharu, Tanabe. 1975–1976. “Kanchonlaprathan phüa kankaset nai prawattisat setthakitthai” [Irrigation for agriculture in Thai economic historyy]. Warasan thammasat 5, 2:70–94.Google Scholar
Shigeharu, Tanabe. 1977. “Historical Geography of the Canal System in the Chao Phraya River Delta from the Ayutthaya Period to the Fourth Reign of the Ratanakosin Dynasty.” journal of the Siam Society 65, 2:23–72.Google Scholar
Numnon, Thaemsuk. 1979. Yangtoek runraek kabot ro¸ so¸ 130 [The first generation of Young Turks]. Bangkok: Ruangsin.Google Scholar
Chaloemtiarana, Thak. 1979. Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism. Bangkok: Social Science Association of Thailand and Thai Khadi Institute, Thammasat University.Google Scholar
Aphçnsuwan, Thanet. 1976. “Pratya prawattisat kho¸ng latthimak” [The historical philosophy of Marxism]. Warasan thammasat 6, 2:83–100.Google Scholar
Bunmi, Thirayut et al. 1981. Patiwat so¸ng naewthang [Two revolutionary paths]. Bangkok: Athit.Google Scholar
Tho¸ngbao, Thçngbai. 1974. Kho¸mmiwnit latyao [Communists of Lard Yao Prison]. Bangkok: Khonnum.Google Scholar
Phüngkanthai, Thongchai. 1978. “Latthikhgmmiwnit lae nayobai tçtan kho¸ng ratthabanthai pho¸ so¸ 2468–2500” [Communism and the Thai government's policies to resist it, 1925–57]. M.A. thesis, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Turton, Andrew, et al. 1978. Thailand: Roots of Conflict. Nottingham: Spokesman.Google Scholar
Sisuwan, Udom [Banĉhong Banĉhoetsin, pseud.]. 1978. Chiwit kap khwamfaifan [Life and dreams]. Bangkok: Do¸kya.Google Scholar
Sisuwan, Udom [Aran Phrommachomphu, pseud.]. [1950] 1979. Senthangsangkhomthai [The path of Thai society]. Bangkok: Akso¸n. Reprint of Thai küngmüangkhün [Thailand, a semicolony]. Bangkok: Mahachon.Google Scholar
van der Heide, J. H. 1906. “The Economical Development of Siam During the Last Half Century.” Journal of the Siam Society 3:74–101.Google Scholar
Phao-ariya, Warit [pseud.]. 1981. ‘Arai khü kanpatiwat prachathipatai katumphi nai thasana khçng mak wikhro¸ kçrani kanpatiwat 2475 lae kanpatiwat 1–3 mesayon 2524” [The nature of bourgeois democratic revolution from the Marxian perspective: Analysis of the 1932 affair and the revolution of 1–3 April 1981]. Paĉharayasan 8, 3:64–73.Google Scholar
Wedel, Yuangrat. 1981. “Modern Thai Radical Thought: The Siamization of Marxism and Its Theoretical Problems.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Wedel, Yuangrat. 1982. “Current Thai Radical Ideology: The Returnees from the Jungle.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 4 1:1–18.Google Scholar
Whitmore, John K. 1980. “Communism and History in Vietnam.” In Vietnamese Communism in Comparative Perspective, ed. Turley, William S., 11–44. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wiĉhit Watthakan, Luang. 1962. “Khamso¸n rüang prawattisat setthakit khçng thai” [Teachings on the history of the Thai economy]. In Wiĉhit anuso¸n [In memory of Wichit], 33–180. Bangkok: Khanaratthamontri.Google Scholar
Wilson, David A. 1960. “Thailand and Marxism.” In Marxism in Southeast Asia, ed. Trager, Frank N., 58–101. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Munlasin, Wuttichai, comp. 1979. Botkhatyo¸ parinyaniphon phakwichaprawattisat mahawitthayalai sinakkharinwirot prasanmit [Abstracts of graduate theses in history, Prasanmit University]. Bangkok: Social Science Association.Google Scholar
Praphaphan, Yada. 1981. Rabop ĉhaophasinai-ako¸n samaikrungthep yukton [The tax farming system in the early Bangkok period]. Bangkok: Sangsan.Google Scholar