Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T18:21:31.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intelligence is not just mental speed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Patrick Rabbitt
Patrick Rabbitt
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre, Manchester M13 9PL
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has long been known that people who have high scores on intelligence tests are also relatively fast at simple laboratory tests of ‘mental speed’ (Woodrow, cited in Woodworth, 1946). When first observed these correlations attracted little interest because, though ubiquitous, they are very modest, accounting for only 3–9% of variance between individuals (Sternberg, R. J., 1977). Correlations between intelligence test scores (TSs) and speed of performance on simple tasks were seen as less interesting than equally strong associations between TSs and performance on simple tests of memory and learning (Woodrow, 1938). The idea that intelligence can be defined as the capacity to learn new skills seemed a more fruitful guide to the development of individual differences in competence (Woodrow, 1946). Further, since scores on most intelligence tests represent the number of problems correctly solved within a time limit, it did not seem remarkable that people who can solve complex problems quickly should also be able to make simple decisions fast. Finally, evidence accumulated that, speed and accuracy of problem solving can be independent; for example, the times that individuals take to solve complex spatial problems do not predict their error-rates (Egan, 1978). Consequently mental speed was seen as only one of many different demands that solving intelligence test problems make on the cognitive system. Many distinguished investigators believe that better insights can be gained into the nature of individual differences in intellectual ability by studying correlations between TSs and performance on complex tasks that demand the encoding, organisation and transformation of information in working memory or successive stages in syllogism solution (e.g. Carpenter & Just, 1989; Daneman & Carpenter, 1980; Kyllonen & Crystal, 1990; Necka, 1992; Sternberg, R. J., 1977).

Information

Type
Session 1: The Nature of Intelligence
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 28 , Special Issue 4: Proceedings of the Galton Institute Symposium on Biological and Social Aspects of Intelligence , October 1996, pp. 425 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bates, T. C. & Eysenck, H. J. (1993) Intelligence, inspection time and decision time. Intelligence. 17, 523–532.Google Scholar
Brinley, J. F. (1965) Cognitive sets, speed and accuracy in the elderly. In: Behaviour, Aging and tile Nervous system. Edited by Welford, A. T. & Birren, J. E.. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Carly, P. G. (1994) Early event-related potentials correlate with inspection times and intelligence. Intelligence, 18, 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. A. & Just, M. A. (1989) The role of working memory in language comprehension. In: Complex Injbrnzation Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon. pp. 31–36. Edited by Klahr, D. & Kotovskyg, K.. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. & Cattell, A. K. S. (1960) The Individual or Group Culture Fair Intelligence Test. IPAT, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
Cerella, J. (1985) Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychol. Bull. 98, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craik, F. I. M. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. verb. Learning verb. Behav. 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. J verb. Learning verb. Behav. 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detterman, D. K. (1982) Does ‘g’ exist? Intelligence, 6, 99–108.Google Scholar
Detterman, D. K. (1986) Human intelligence is a complex system of separate processes. In: What is Intelligence? Edited by Sternberg, R. J. & Detterman, D. K.. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
Egan, D. E. (1978) Characterising Spatial Ability: Different Mental Processes Reflected in Accuracy and Latency Scores. Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1986) The theory of intelligence and the psychophysiology of cognition. In: Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 3. Edited by Sternberg, R. J.. Lawrence Eribaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Goward, L. M. (1987) An Investigation of the Factors Contributing to Scores on Intelligence Tests. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Helm, A. W. (1970) The AH 4 Group Test of General Intelligence. NFER-Nelson, Windsor.Google Scholar
Hendricksen, A. E. (1982) The biological basis of intelligence. Part 1. Theory. In: A Model for Intelligence. Edited by Eysenck, H. J.. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hick, W. E. (1952) On the rate of gain of information. Q. J. exp. Psychol. 4, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, H. S., Gordon, G. P. & Gold, L. (1975) Individual differences in the verbal coding of familiar visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 3, 257–262.Google Scholar
Hock, H. S., Gordon, G. P. & Marcus, N. (1974) Individual differences in the detection of embedded figures. Percept. Psychophys. 15, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1978) Human ability systems. In: Lifespan Development and Behaviour, Vol. 1. Edited by Baltes, P. B.. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1982) The theory of fluid and crystallised intelligence in relation to concepts of cognitive psychology and aging in adulthood. In: Aging and Cognitive Processes, pp. 237–278. Edited by Craik, F. I. M. & Trehub, S.. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1986) Intellectual ability concepts. In: Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, pp. 35–75. Edited by Sternberg, R. J.. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. G., Frost, N. & Lunneborg, C. L. (1973) Individual differences in cognition: a new approach to intelligence. In: Advances in Learning and Motivation, Vol. 7. Edited by Bower, G.. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hyman, R. (1953) Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J. exp. Psychol. 45, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. R. (1980) Chronometric analysis of mental ability. J. Social biot Struct. 3, 181–224.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1985) The nature of the black—white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. Behav. Brain Sci. 8, 193–213.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1987) Individual differences in the Hick paradigm. In: Speed of Information Processing and Intelligence. Edited by Vernon, P. A.. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. & Whang, P.A. (1993) Reaction times and intelligence: a comparison of Chinese-American and Anglo-American children. J. biosoc. Sci. 25, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kail, R., Carter, P. & Pelligrino, J. (1979) The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Percept. Psychophys. 26, 182–186.Google Scholar
Kail, R. & Salthouse, T. A. (1994) Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta psychologica, 86, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keating, D. P. & Bobbitt, B. L. (1978) Individual and developmental differences in cognitive processing components of mental ability. Child Dev. 49, 155–167.Google Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C. & Christal, R. E. (1990) Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laming, D. R.J. (1985) Sensory Analysis. London.Google ScholarPubMed
Luce, R. D. (1986) Response Times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organisation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mansfield, R. J.W. (1973) Latency functions in human vision. Vision Res. 13, 65–75.Google Scholar
Mollon, J. D. & Krauskopf, J. (1973) Reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of individual colour mechanisms. Vision Res. 13, 27–40.Google Scholar
Mumaw, R. J. & Pelligrino, J. W. (1984) J. Educ. Psychol. 76, 920–939.Google Scholar
Naatanen, R. (1970) The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction time experiments with varying fore-periods. Acta psychologica, 34, 399–327.Google Scholar
Naatanen, R. (1971) Non-aging fore period and simple reaction time. Acta psychologica, 35, 316–327.Google Scholar
Naatanen, R. & Merisalo, A. (1977) Expectancy and preparation in simple reaction time. In: Attention and Performance VI, pp. 115–138. Edited by Dornic, S.. Lawrence Eribaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Necka, E. (1992) Cognitive analysis of intelligence: the significance of working memory processes. Personal. individ. Diffs 13, 1031–1046.Google Scholar
Parker, D. M. (1980) Simple reaction times to the onset, offset and contrast reversal of sinusoidal grating stimuli. Perception & Psychophys. 28, 365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D. M. & Salzen, E. A. (1977) Latency changes in the human visual evoked response to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Res. 17, 1201–1204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nickerson, R. S. & Burnham, D. W. (1969) Response times with non-aging foreperiods. J. exp. Psychol. 79, 452–457.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I. (1978) Chronometric Explorations of Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1993a) Does it all go together when it goes? Q. I exp. Psychol 46A, 385–434.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1993b) Crystal quest: an examination of the concepts of ‘fluid’ and ‘crystallised’ intelligence as explanations for cognitive changes in old age. In: Attention, Selection, Awareness and Control. Edited by Baddeley, A. D. & Weiskrantz, L.. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P. M. A. & Banerji, N. (1989) How does very prolonged practice affect decision speed? J. exp. Psychol. Gen. 98, 273–244.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P. M. A., Banerji, N. & Szymanski, A. (1989) Space fortress as an IQ test? Predictions of learning and of practised performance in a complex interactive video-game. Acta psychologica, 71, 243–257.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P. M. A. & Gowaiw, L. (1994) Age, IQ test score, practice and individual differences in reaction times. Q. I exp. Psychol 47A, 741–760.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P. M. A. & Vyas, S. M. (1973) An elementary preliminary taxonomy for some errors in laboratory choice RT. tasks. Acra psychologica, 33, 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Y. E. & Jensen, A. R. (1993) A Somatosensory latency between the thalamus and the cortex also correlates with intelligence. Intelligence, 17, 443–449.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1985) A Cognitive Theory of Aging. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1991) Theoretical Perspectives on Cognitive Aging. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Smith, E. E. (1968) Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychol. Bull. 69, 77–110.Google Scholar
Smith, G. A. (1980) Models of choice reaction time. In: Reaction Times. Edited by Welford, A. T.. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Smith, G. A. & Brewer, N. (1995) Slowness and age: speed—accuracy mechanisms. Psychol. Aging, 10, 238–247.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., Luce, R.D. & Galanter, E. (1967) Some experiments on simple and choice reaction time. J. exp. Psychol. 75, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spearman, C. (1927) The Abilities of Man. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1977) Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning: The Componenrial Analysis of Human Abilities. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Sternberg, S. (1969) Memory scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. Am. Scient. 57, 421–457.Google Scholar
Sternberg, S. (1975) Memory scanning:. new findings and current controversies. Q. J. exp. Psychol. 17, 1–32.Google Scholar
Stone, M. (1960) Models for choice reaction time. Psychometrika, 25, 251–260.Google Scholar
Theios, J. (1975) The components of response latency in simple human information processing tasks. In: Attention and Performance V, pp. 418–440. Edited by Rabbitt, P. M. A. & Dornic, S.. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Townsend, J. T. & Ashby, F. G. (1973) Stochastic Modelling of Elementary Psychological Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. A. (1983) Speed of information processing and inteffigence. Intelligence, 7, 53–70.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. A. (1985) Individual differences in general cognitive ability. In: The Neuropsychology of Individual Differences; a Developmental Perspective. Edited by Hartledge, L. C. & Telzner, C. F.. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. A. & Jensen, A. R. (1984) Individual and group differences in intelligence and speed of information processing. Personal. individ. Diffs 5, 411–423.Google Scholar
Woodrow, H. A. (1938) The effects of practice on groups of different initial ability. J. educ. Psychol. 29, 268–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodrow, H. A. (1946) The ability to learn. Psychol. Rev. 53, 147–158.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. (1946) Experimental Psychology. Henry Holt, New York.Google Scholar
Yang, Q. (1994) Understanding Short Term Memory Through Individual Differences in Performance. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Zahn, T. P. & Rosenta, D.. (1966) Simple reaction time as a function of the relative frequency of the preparatory interval. J. exp. Psychol. 72, 15–19.Google Scholar