Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:28:34.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Event knowledge and early language acquisition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Michael Jeffrey Farrar,
Margaret J. Friend and
James N. Forbes
Michael Jeffrey Farrar*
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Margaret J. Friend
Affiliation:
University of Florida
James N. Forbes
Affiliation:
University of Florida
*
Address for correspondence: Psychology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of event knowledge in early language acquisition was investigated. Thirteen two-year-olds were observed interacting with their mothers over a five-week period. During weekly observational sessions, dyads interacted in both a familiar-event context and an unfamiliar-event context. Events were represented by complex toys (e.g. airport, marina, etc.). In the familiar-event, dyads interacted with the same event-toy during each observation period. In the unfamiliar-event, these same dyads interacted with a different novel toy during each observation period. The results indicated that children's increasing event knowledge facilitated their language development. Specifically, children's lexical type use, action verb use, and MLU increased in the familiar-event, but remained unchanged in the unfamiliar-event. Event knowledge also facilitated children's lexical token use. Results are discussed in terms of the role of event knowledge in language acquisition.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , October 1993, pp. 591 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by a NIMH grant (RO3 MH44032) and a University of Florida Faculty support grant awarded to the first author. The second and third authors were supported by NICHD predoctoral training fellowships (HD07318–04). We would like to thank the mothers and children who participated in this study.

References

REFERENCES

Adams, A. & Bullock, D. (1986). Apprenticeship in word use: social convergence processes in learning categorically related nouns. In Kuczaj, S. II, & Barrett, M. D. (eds), The development of word meaning. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NH: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, B., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first mords to grammar. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. & Mandler, J. (1990). Remembering what happened next: very young children's recall of event sequences. In Fivush, R. & Hudson, J. (eds), Knowing and remembering in young children. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk: learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1983). Meanings and concepts. In Flavell, J. & Markman, E. (eds), Cognitive development. Vol. 3 of P. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G. & Friel-Patti, S. (1987). Situational variability in mother-child conversations. In Nelson, K. & Van Kleek, A. (eds), Children's language. Vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Farrar, M. J. & Goodman, G. S. (1990). Developmental differences in the relation between scripts and episodic memory: do they exist? In Fivush, R. & Hudson, J. (eds), Knowing and remembering in young children. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review 87, 477–531.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. & Canfield, R. (1986). The ambiguity of stage and structure in behaviour: person and environment in the development of psychological structures. In Levin, I. (ed.), Stage and structure. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. W. & Corrigan, R. (1981). A skill approach to language development. In Stark, R. (ed.), Language behavior in infancy and early childhood. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. & Farrar, M. J. (1988). Generalizations about generalizations: how a theory of skill development explains both generality and specificity in development. In Demetriou, A. (ed.), The Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
French, L. & Nelson, K. (1985). Children's acquisition of relational terms. Some ifs, or, and buts. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A. (1986). Relations between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage: the specificity hypothesis. Child Development 57, 1040–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. (1986). Memories are made of this: general event knowledge and the development of autobiographical memory. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Event knowledge: structure and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A. & Engel, S. (1986). Event representations, context and language. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Event knowledge: structure and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lucariello, J. & Nelson, K. (1982). Situational variation in mother-child interaction. Paper presented at the meeting of the Third International Conference on Infant Studies, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Lucariello, J. & Nelson, K. (1986). Context effects on lexical specificity in maternal and child discourse. Journal of Child Language 13, 507–22.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. (1985). The child language data exchange System. Journal of Child Language 12, 271–96.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. (1984). Stories, scripts and scenes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. (1988). Child-basic object categories and early lexical development. In Neisser, U. (ed), Concepts and conceptual development. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. & Bruner, J. S. (1978). The achievements and antecedents of labelling. Journal of Child Language 5, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1980). The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.), Language and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ratner, N. & Bruner, J. S. (1978). Games, social exchange, and the acquisition of language. Journal of Child Language 5, 391–402.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1983). Communication. In Flavell, J. & Markman, E. (eds), Cognitive development. Vol. 3 of P. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Snow, C. (1986). Conversations with children. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Snow, C. & Goldfield, B. (1983). Turn the page please: situation-specific language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10, 551–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., Perlmann, R. & Nathan, D. (1987). Why routines are different: toward a multiple-factors model of the relation between input and language acquisition. In Nelson, K. & Van Kleek, A., (eds), Children's language. Vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, M. J. (1984). Cognitive bases of early lexical development: object permanence and relational word development. Journal of Child Language 11, 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Object permanence and relational words: a lexical training study. Journal of Child Language 13, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed