Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T13:16:40.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactive influences on phonological behaviour: a case study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Nan Bernstein Ratner
Nan Bernstein Ratner*
Affiliation:
The University of Maryland
*
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Lefrak Hall, The University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA. E-mail addresses: nratner@umail.umd.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An infant girl's unusual phonological behaviour was evaluated in the light of a maternai model which appeared to exaggerate features of normal conversational speech. It is suggested that parental responses to immature speech patterns may account for selected case study behaviours which have been reported in both the child phonology and child fluency literatures. It appears that evaluation of phonological development within an interactive framework may allow a more accurate picture of the conditions under which children learn speech skills. To this end, further study of the phonetic characteristics of input language and patterns of parental feedback to early articulatory attempts is desirable.

Information

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 191 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

This note is based upon a presentation at the Fifth IASCL Congress, Budapest, July 1990.

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, V. & Bernstein Ratner, N. (1987). Patterns of maternal and paternal response to language-learners' verbalizations. American Speech, Language and Hearing Association annual convention. Asha 29 (10), 135.Google Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. (1987). The phonology of parent–child speech. In Nelson, K. & van Kleeck, A. (eds), Children's language. Vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. & Luberoff, A. (1984). Cues to post-vocalic voicing in mother–child speech. Journal of Phonetics 12, 285–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camarata, S. (1989). Final consonant repetition: a linguistic perspective. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54, 159–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunwell, P. (1981). The nature of phonological disability in children. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1989). Phonological disability in children (2nd edn). London: Cole & Whurr.Google Scholar
Khan, L. & Lewis, N. (1986). Khan–Lewis phonological analysis. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Lebrun, Y., Van Endert, C. & Szliwowski, H. (1988). Trilingual hyperlexia. In Obler, L. & Fein, D. (eds), The exceptional brain. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Macken, M. & Ferguson, C. (1983). Cognitive aspects of phonological development: model, evidence and issues. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language. Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1990). Computational tools for analyzing talk. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon.Google Scholar
Maxwell, E. (1981). The use of acoustic phonetics in phonological analysis. Journal of the National Student Speech Language Hearing Association 9, 20–37.Google Scholar
Mowrer, D. (1987). Repetition of final consonants in the speech of a young child. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 52, 174–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renfrew, C. (1966). Persistence of the open syllable in defective articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 31, 370–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoel-Gammon, C. (1984). Phonological variability in mother—child speech. Phonetica 48, 208–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Dunn, C. (1985). Normal and disordered phonology in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Weismer, G., Dinnsen, D. & Elbert, M. (1981). A study of the voicing distinction associated with omitted, word-final stops. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 46, 320–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velten, H. (1943). The growth of phonemic and lexical patterns in infant language. Language 19, 281–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar