Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T22:51:53.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning how ‘it’ works*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Christine Tanz
Christine Tanz
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a replication and extension of a study on the pronoun it by Chipman & de Dardel, 61 children aged 3; 1–5; 2 were asked to carry out instructions of the form ‘There is playdough on the table. Give it to me’. They were also asked ‘Give me some’, and ‘Give me the playdough’. The results indicate that children do observe the distinction between definite and indefinite pronouns as it applies to quantity, from the youngest age studied. It is also argued that to the extent that children fail to fully comprehend the implications of using the definite pronoun, their failure applies to definite reference in general, and not the pronoun in particular.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 225 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

Preparation of this article was supported by grant number SOC75-00565 from NSF to the Center for Comparative Psycholinguistics, University of Illinois. I owe thanks to Charles Osgood for his helpful discussions during the planning of the experiment and to Niki Merrick for her assistance in conducting it. I would also like to thank the teachers and students of the following nursery schools for their cooperation: Children's Research Centre at the University of Illinois, Toddler's Campus, Orchard Downs Cooperative, and Kiddie Kountry. A version of this paper was presented at the Seventh Annual Child Language Research Forum, Stanford, April 1975.

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chipman, H. & de Dardel, C. (1974). Developmental study of the comprehension and production of the pronoun it. JPsycholingRes 3. 91–9.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1973). Language acquisition and communicative choice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (eds), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1969). The early growth of logic in the child. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1968). What do referential indices refer to? Santa Monica, Cal.: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1968 b). What makes definite noun phrases definite? Santa Monica, Cal.: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (1974). Conversational competence in children. JChLang 1. 163–83.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1971). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1973). The effects of stress on the understanding of pronominal co-reference in children. J. PsycholingRes 2. 1–8.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1974). Preschool children's use of definite and indefinite articles. ChDev 45. 446–55.Google Scholar