An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
Carrow, M. A. (1968). The development of auditory comprehension of language structure in children. JSpHDis33. 99–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Cook, V. J. (1974). Is explanatory adequacy adequate?Linguistics133. 21–31.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1975). An experimental investigation of a putative linguistic universal: marking and the indirect object. JExpChPsych20. 73–80.Google Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. JVLVB2. 121–35.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. PsychRev79. 1–13.Google Scholar
McNeill, D., Yukawa, R. & McNeill, N. B. (1971). The acquisition of direct and indirect objects in Japanese. ChDev42. 237–49.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel.38.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. (1973). Theoretical implications of word order, topicalization and inflections in German language acquisition. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (eds), Studies of language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Stayton, B. (1972). The acquisition of direct and indirect objects in English. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Waryas, C. & Stremel, K. (1974). On the preferred form of the double object construction. JPsycholingRes3. 271–80.Google Scholar