Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:33:32.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of prediction in construction-learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2005

ADELE E. GOLDBERG
Affiliation:
Princeton University
DEVIN M. CASENHISER
Affiliation:
Princeton University
NITYA SETHURAMAN
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

It is well-established that (non-linguistic) categorization is driven by a functional demand of prediction. We suggest that prediction likewise may well play a role in motivating the learning of semantic generalizations about argument structure constructions. We report corpora statistics that indicate that the argument frame or construction has roughly equivalent cue validity as a predictor of overall sentence meaning as the morphological form of the verb, and has greater category validity. That is, the construction is at least as reliable and more available than the verb. Moreover, given the fact that many verbs have quite low cue validity in isolation, attention to the contribution of the construction is essential.

Information

Type
Note
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press