Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T03:58:37.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

511 Building capacity through co-design: Developing a community-engaged research 101 training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2026

Shari Bolen
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Erika Trapl
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Chaney Nezbeth
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Thomas Ortiz
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Abby Wilson
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Michael Walton
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Delores Collins
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Ivory Simms
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Jacqueline Dolata
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Darerian Schueller
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Darcy Freedman
Affiliation:
Case Western University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Objectives/Goals: Community-engaged research (CER) emphasizes equitable partnerships between academic and community partners, yet many lack structured training opportunities to develop the necessary knowledge and skills to engage. Recognizing this gap, we launched a co-design process to develop a CER 101 course tailored for both community members and academics. Methods/Study Population: The CER101 design process is rooted in principles of co-design. CAB members, community partners, and academics meet as part of an iterative, interactive, facilitated process to share perspectives, exchange knowledge, and co-create course content. A 2-day workshop began with a process to align visions – define the audience of the course, identify barriers to engagement with the material, and define parameters of the final product. Activities included structured discussions, brainstorming sessions, and feedback cycles. Emphasis is placed on valuing first-hand experience alongside academic expertise to ensure accessibility and relevance. Results/Anticipated Results: The co-design process will produce a CER 101 training that reflects jointly developed foundational concepts, practical strategies for building equitable community–academic partnerships, and case studies highlighting effective CER practices. Participants are expected to demonstrate improved understanding of CER principles, enhanced ability to apply tools for collaboration, and greater appreciation for both lived and academic expertise. The training will strengthen mutual trust, expand shared capacity for CER, and inform iterative refinements to ensure sustained relevance and impact within the community of practice. Discussion/Significance of Impact: In addition to resulting in the development of a CER 101 course that includes foundational concepts and practical strategies for engaging in CER, the co-design process will lead to increased mutual understanding of CER principles, enhanced appreciation for diverse forms of expertise, and strengthen trust.

Information

Type
Translational integrative and engagement in research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science