Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T18:51:48.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asset Pricing Models: Further Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

George Foster
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The capital asset pricing model specifies that relative risk is a sufficient descriptor of security risk. This result holds under both the Sharpe-Lintner version,

and the more general Black version of the model,

where

= expected rate of return on asset i,

Rf = riskless rate of interest,

= expected return on the market portfolio,

= expected return on any “zero-beta” asset or portfolio of such assests, and

= relative risk of asset i in the market portfolio of assests.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1978, pp. 39 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ball, R.; Brown, P.; and Officer, R. R.. “Asset Pricing in the Australian Industrial Equity Market.” Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 1 (1976), pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Black, P., and Scholes, M.. “The Effects of Dividend Yield and Dividend Policy on Common Stock Prices and Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 1 (1974), pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Black, P.; Jensen, M.; and Scholes, M.. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Jensen, M. C.. New York: Praeger (1972), pp. 79–124.Google Scholar
[4]Douglas, G. W. “Risk in the Equity Markets: An Empirical Appraisal of Market Efficiency.” Yale Economic Essays, Vol. 9 (1969), pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
[5]Fama, E. F. “A Note on the Market Model and the Two-Parameter Model.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 28 (1973), pp. 1181–1186.Google Scholar
[6]Fama, E. F.. Portfolio Decisions and Security Prices. New York: Basic Books (1976).Google Scholar
[7]Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J. D.. “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81 (1973), pp. 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Friend, I., and Blume, M.. “Measurement of Portfolio Performance under Uncertainty.” American Economic Review, Vol. 60 (1970), pp. 561–575.Google Scholar
[9]Jensen, M. C. “Capital Markets: Theory and Evidence.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 3 (1972), pp. 357–398.Google Scholar
[10]Johnston, J.Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill (1972).Google Scholar
[11]Miller, M., and Scholes, M.. “Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Reexamination of Some Recent Findings.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Jensen, M. C.. New York: Praeger (1972), pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
[12]Roll, R. “A critique of the asset pricing theory's tests; Part 1: On past and potential testability of the theory.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 4 (1977), pp. 129–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar