Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T12:05:19.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benchmark Discrepancies and Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2021

K. J. Martijn Cremers
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame Mendoza College of Business mcremers@nd.edu
Jon A. Fulkerson
Affiliation:
University of Dayton School of Business Administration jfulkerson1@udayton.edu
Timothy B. Riley*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Walton College of Business
*
tbriley@uark.edu (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We introduce a new holdings-based procedure to identify whether a mutual fund has a benchmark discrepancy, which we define as a benchmark other than the prospectus benchmark best matching a fund’s investment strategy. We find that funds with a benchmark discrepancy tend to be riskier than their prospectus benchmarks indicate. As a result, the funds on average outperform their prospectus benchmarks, before further risk adjustments, despite underperforming the benchmarks that best match their portfolios.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington
Supplementary material: PDF

Cremers et al. supplementary material

Cremers et al. supplementary material 1

Download Cremers et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 870.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Cremers et al. supplementary material

Cremers et al. supplementary material 1

Download Cremers et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.9 MB