Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T10:25:39.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Analysts: Method for Defining Peer Firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2020

Markku Kaustia and
Ville RantalaOpen the ORCID record for Ville Rantala[Opens in a new window]
Markku Kaustia*
Affiliation:
Aalto University School of Business markku.kaustia@aalto.fi
Ville Rantala
Affiliation:
University of Miami Herbert Business School vrantala@bus.miami.edu
*
markku.kaustia@aalto.fi (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We develop a method for defining groups of peer firms on the basis of joint analyst coverage. Besides industry boundaries, analysts’ coverage choices reflect other aspects of firm relatedness such as business model. We find that the analyst-based method produces substantially more homogeneous groups of firms compared to common industry classifications, and has a number of other desirable properties. The paper has two broader implications. First, it demonstrates the advantages of a self-organizing approach to classification, as opposed to a hierarchical system. Second, it illustrates a new positive information production externality generated by the institution of security market analysis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 56 , Issue 5 , August 2021, pp. 1505 - 1536
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We thank anonymous referees, Jan Bartholdy, Jonathan Berk, Thierry Foucault, Guojin Gong, Jarrad Harford (the editor), Gerard Hoberg, Hans Hvide, Timo Korkeamäki, Alexander Ljungqvist, Michelle Lowery, and Gordon Phillips, as well as the seminar participants at the 2014 American Finance Association and at the 2013 American Accounting Association, and the 2013 Nordic Finance Network workshop for comments. Rantala acknowledges financial support from the Finnish Foundation for Advancement of Securities Market.

References

Acemoglu, D.; Carvalho, V. M.; Ozdaglar, A.; and Tahbaz-Salehi, A.. “The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations.” Econometrica, 80 (2012), 1977–2016.Google Scholar
Ahern, K., and Harford, J.. “The Importance of Industry Links in Merger Waves.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 527–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albuquerque, A. M.; De Franco, G.; and Verdi, R. S.. “Peer Choice in CEO Compensation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, U., and Hirshleifer, D. A.. “Shared Analyst Coverage: Unifying Momentum Spillover Effects.” Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Lyon, J. D.. “Detecting Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 341–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, A.; Liao, S.; and Yu, J. J.. “The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Financial Reporting on Peer Firms’ Investments.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55 (2013), 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, A.; Cohen, D. A.; Lys, T. Z.; and Walther, B. R.. “The Financial Reporting Environment: Review of the Recent Literature.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2010), 296–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhojraj, S.; Lee, C. M. C.; and Oler, D. K.. “What’s My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes of Capital Market Research.” Journal of Accounting Research, 41 (2003), 745–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizjak, J.; Lemmon, M.; and Nguyen, T.. “Are All CEOs Above Average? An Empirical Analysis of Compensation Peer Groups and Pay Design.” Journal of Financial Economics, 100 (2011), 538–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boni, L., and Womack, K. L.. “Analysts, Industries, and Price Momentum.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41 (2006), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, D.; Gokkaya, S.; and Liu, X.. “Before an Analyst Becomes an Analyst: Does Industry Experience Matter?” Journal of Finance, 72 (2017), 751–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, D.; Gokkaya, S.; Liu, X.; and Xie, F.. “Are All Analysts Created Equal? Industry Expertise and Monitoring Effectiveness of Financial Analysts.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63 (2017), 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. D.; Call, A. C.; Clement, M. B.; and Sharp, N. Y.. “Inside the “Black Box” of Sell‐Side Financial Analysts.” Journal of Accounting Research, 53 (2015), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K., and Hameed, A.. “Stock Price Synchronicity and Analyst Coverage in Emerging Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2006), 115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, X.; Dasgupta, S.; and Hilary, G.. “Analyst Coverage and Financing Decisions.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 3009–3048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, S.; Guo, R.-J.; and Zhang, H.. “Analysts’ Selective Coverage and Subsequent Performance of Newly Public Firms.” Journal of Finance, 61(2006), 1159–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Khatib, R.; Fogel, K.; and Jandik, T.. “CEO Network Centrality and Merger Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 116 (2015), 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Industry Costs of Equity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?” Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2001), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkender, M., and Yang, J.. “Inside the Black Box: the Role and Composition of Compensation Peer Groups.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Register. Economic Classification Policy Committee; Standard Industrial Classification Replacement; Notice. Doc No: 94–18095, Volume 59, Number 142, Tuesday, July 26, 1994.Google Scholar
Foucault, T., and Frésard, L.. “Learning from Peers’ Stock Prices and Corporate Investment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (2014), 554–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fracassi, C. “Corporate Finance Policies and Social Networks.” Management Science, 63 (2017), 2397–2771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, J.; Hanna, D. J.; and Philbrick, D. R.. “Management Communications with Securities Analysts.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1997), 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatev, E.; Goetzmann, W. N.; and Rouwenhorst, K. G.. “Pairs Trading: Performance of a Relative-Value Arbitrage Rule.” Review of Financial Studies, 19 (2006), 797–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilson, S. C.; Healy, P. M.; Noe, C. F.; and Palepu, K. G.. “Analyst Specialization and Conglomerate Stock Breakups.” Journal of Accounting Research, 39 (2001), 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, Y.; Wong, M. H. F; and Zhang, Y.. “Analyst Following Along the Supply Chain.” Review of Accounting Studies, 20 (2015), 210–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenther, D. A., and Rosman, A. J.. “Differences Between COMPUSTAT and CRSP SIC Codes and Related Effects on Research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18 (1994), 115–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hameed, A.; Morck, R.; Shen, J.; and Yeung, B.. “Information, Analysts, and Stock Return Comovement.” Review of Financial Studies, 28 (2015), 3153–3187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herskovic, B. “Networks in Production: Asset Pricing Implications.” Journal of Finance, 73 (2018), 1785–1818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilary, G., and Shen, R.. “The Role of Analysts in Intra-Industry Information Transfer.” Accounting Review, (2013) 88, 1265–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, G., and Phillips, G.. “Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation.” Journal of Political Economy, (2016) 124, 1423–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, H., and Kubik, J. D.. “Analyzing the Analysts: Career Concerns and Biased Earnings Forecasts.” Journal of Finance, (2003) 58, 313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, H.; Kubik, J. D.; and Solomon, A.. “Security Analysts’ Career Concerns and Herding of Earnings Forecasts.” RAND Journal of Economics, 31 (2000), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israelsen, R. D. “Does Common Analyst Coverage Explain Excess Comovement?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51 (2016), 1193–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, J.; Lee, J.; and Matsumoto, D. A.. “The Effect of Industry Co-Location on Analysts’ Information Acquisition Costs.” Accounting Review, 92 (2017), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaustia, M., and Rantala, V.. “Social Learning and Corporate Peer Effects.” Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A.; Rantala, V.; and Xu, R.. “Social Learning and Analyst Behavior.” Working Paper, University of Miami (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larcker, D. F.; So, E. C.; and Wang, C. C. Y.. “Boardroom Centrality and Firm Performance.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55 (2013), 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, M. T., and Roberts, M. R.. “Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 139–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M. C.; Ma, P.; and Wang, C. C. Y.. “Search‐Based Peer Firms: Aggregating Investor Perceptions through Internet Co‐Searches.” Journal of Financial Economics, 116 (2015), 410–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M. C.; Ma, P.; and Wang, C. C. Y.. “The Search For Peer Firms: When Do Crowds Provide Wisdom?” Working Paper, Harvard Business School (2016).Google Scholar
Lewellen, S. “Firm-Specific Industries.” Working Paper, Yale University (2012).Google Scholar
Li, V. “Do False Financial Statements Distort Peer Firms’ Decisions?” Accounting Review, 91 (2016), 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljungqvist, A.; Malloy, C.; and Marston, F.. “Rewriting History.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 1935–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, S., and Nagarajan, N. J.. “Information Complementarities and Supply Chain Analysts.” Accounting Review, 90 (2015), 1995–2029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, J. D.; Barber, B. M.; and Tsai, C.. “Improved Methods For Tests of Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 54 (2003), 165–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, C. “The Geography of Equity Analysis.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 719–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkley, K.; Michaely, R.; and Pacelli, J.. “Does the Scope of the Sell‐Side Analyst Industry Matter? An Examination of Bias, Accuracy, and Information Content of Analyst Reports.” Journal of Finance, 72 (2017), 1285–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaely, R., and Womack, K. L.. “Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst Recommendations.” Review of Financial Studies, 12 (1999), 653–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhail, M. B.; Walther, B. R.; and Willis, R. H.. “Do Security Analysts Exhibit Persistent Differences in Stock Picking Ability?” Journal of Financial Economics, 74 (2004), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muslu, V.; Rebello, M.; and Xu, Y.. “Sell-Side Analyst Research and Stock Comovement.” Journal of Accounting Research, 52 (2014), 911–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, P. C., and Tan, H.. “Geographic Proximity and Analyst Coverage Decisions: Evidence from IPOs.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 59 (2015), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotroski, J. D., and Roulstone, D. T.. “The Influence of Analysts, Institutional Investors, and Insiders on the Incorporation of Market, Industry, and Firm‐Specific Information into Stock Prices.” Accounting Review, 79 (2004), 1119–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L.. “What Do We Know About Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1421–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramnath, S. “Investor and Analyst Reactions to Earnings Announcements of Related Firms: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (2002), 1351–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickel, S. E. “Reputation and Performance Among Security Analysts.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 1811–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kaustia and Rantala supplementary material

Kaustia and Rantala supplementary material

Download Kaustia and Rantala supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 202.7 KB