Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T14:29:19.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Firm Characteristics, Relative Efficiency, and Equity Returns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2009

Giao X. Nguyen and
Peggy E. Swanson
Giao X. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Viet Capital Securities, 67 Ham Nghi St., District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. giao.nguyen@vcsc.com.vn
Peggy E. Swanson
Affiliation:
College of Business Administration, Box 19449, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019. swanson@uta.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This study uses a stochastic frontier approach to evaluate firm efficiency. The resulting efficiency score, based on firm characteristics, is the input for performance evaluation. The portfolio composed of highly efficient firms significantly underperforms the portfolio composed of inefficient firms even after adjustment for firm characteristics and risk factors, suggesting a required premium for the inefficient firms. The difference in performance between the two portfolios remains for at least five years after the portfolio formation year. In addition, firm efficiency exhibits significant explanatory power for average equity returns in cross-sectional analysis.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 2009, pp. 213 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2009

References

Aigner, D.; Lovell, C.; and Schmidt, P.. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 6 (1977), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C., and Garcia-Feijoo, L.. “Empirical Evidence on Capital Investment, Growth Options, and Security Returns.”Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, R.; Killgo, K.; Siems, T.; and Zimmel, S.. “Evaluating the Productive Efficiency and Performance of U.S. Commercial Banks.” Managerial Finance, 28 (2002), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, R.; Seiford, L.; and Siems, T.. “Forecasting Bank Failure: A Non-Parametric Approach.” Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 60 (1994), 411–429.Google Scholar
Berger, A., and Humphrey, D.. “Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking.” In Measurement Issues in the Service Sectors, Griliches, Z., ed. Chicago, IL: National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press (1992), 245–279.Google Scholar
Berger, A., and Humphrey, D.. “Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research.” European Journal of Operational Research, 98 (1997), 175–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carhart, M. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebenoyan, A.; Cooperman, E.; and Register, C.. “Firm Inefficiency and the Regulatory Closure of S&Ls: An Empirical Investigation.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 75 (1993), 540–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, K.; Grinblatt, M.; Titman, S.; and Wermers, R.. “Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristics-Based Benchmarks.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 1035–1058.Google Scholar
Daniel, K., and Titman, S.. “Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross-Sectional Variation in Common Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. “Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy.” Journal of Law and Economics, 16 (1973), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. “Two Systems of Belief About Monopoly.” In Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, Goldschmid, H. J., Mann, H. M., and Weston, J. F., eds. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company (1974), 164–184.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H., and Villalonga, B.. “Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (2001), 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. “Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 49 (1998), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 427–465.Google Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns of Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings Return.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 131–155.Google Scholar
Fama, E., and MacBeth, J.. “Risk Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. “Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23 (2005), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grullon, G.; Kanatas, G.; and Weston, J.. “Advertising, Breadth of Ownership, and Liquidity.” Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2004), 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habib, M., and Ljungqvist, A.. “Firm Value and Managerial Incentives: A Stochastic Frontier Approach.”Journal of Business, 78 (2005), 2053–2093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermalin, B., and Wallace, N.. “The Determinants of Efficiency and Solvency in Savings and Loans.” RAND Journal of Economics, 25 (1994), 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, K., and Robinson, D.. “Industry Concentration and Average Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 1927–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt-McCool, J.; Koh, C.; and Francis, B.. “Testing for Deliberate Underpricing in the IPO Premarket: A Stochastic Frontier Approach.” Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 1251–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, T., and Ritter, J.. “Uniformly Least Powerful Tests of Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 55 (2000), 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, J., and Servaes, H.. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palia, D. “The Endogeneity of Managerial Compensation in Firm Valuation: A Solution.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 735–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, S. “The Gains and Losses from Industrial Concentration.” Journal of Law and Economics, 20 (1977), 229–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, T. “The Delisting Bias in CRSP Data.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, T., and Warther, V.. “The Delisting Bias in CRSP’s NASDAQ Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 2361–2379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titman, S.; Wei, J.; and Xie, F.. “Capital Investments and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39 (2004), 677–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wermers, R. “Is Money Really ‘Smart? ’ New Evidence on the Relation between Mutual Fund Flows, Manager Behavior, and Performance Persistence.” Working Paper, University of Maryland (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar