Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T15:01:01.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Does Forced-CEO-Turnover Experience Affect Directors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2020

Jesse Ellis
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University Poole College of Management jaellis5@ncsu.edu
Lixiong Guo
Affiliation:
University of Alabama Culverhouse College of Business lguo@cba.ua.edu
Shawn Mobbs*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama Culverhouse College of Business smobbs@cba.ua.edu
*
smobbs@cba.ua.edu (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We study changes in independent director behavior and labor-market outcomes after the experience of a forced Chief Executive Officer (CEO) turnover. We find that independent directors are more willing to fire CEOs of underperforming firms, hire outside CEOs after a firing, and encourage better board-meeting attendance by fellow directors. We also find that the shareholders of poorly performing firms react positively when experienced directors join the board. It does come with a small cost for directors, in terms of additional directorships, although the cost is not as great as that for directors who do not fire the CEO of a poorly performing firm.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© THE AUTHOR(S), 2020. PUBLISHED BY CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS ON BEHALF OF THE MICHAEL G. FOSTER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
Supplementary material: PDF

Ellis et al. supplementary material

Tables A1-A2

Download Ellis et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 78.9 KB