Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T03:53:21.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Initial Margin Requirements and Market Efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2023

Ferhat Akbas
Affiliation:
University of Illinois–Chicago College of Business Administration ferhat@uic.edu
Lezgin Ay
Affiliation:
University of North Texas G. Brint Ryan College of Business lezgin.ay@unt.edu
Paul D. Koch*
Affiliation:
Iowa State University Ivy College of Business
*
pkoch@iastate.edu (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We examine the association between margin requirements and the market’s efficiency in incorporating firm-specific and market-level public news. Combining the Fed’s 22 changes in margin requirements with a hand-collected sample of earnings announcements between 1934 and 1975, we show that higher margin requirements induce greater delay in incorporating earnings information into prices. We draw similar conclusions when we analyze the Hou and Moskowitz (2005) price delay measure, as well as indirect measures of leverage constraints over recent years. Further tests suggest that, despite the Fed’s expressed intent to curtail excess speculation, higher margin requirements restrict trading by arbitrageurs more than noise traders.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School Of Business, University of Washington
Supplementary material: PDF

Akbas et al. supplementary material

Akbas et al. supplementary material

Download Akbas et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 825.3 KB