Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:04:33.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiplicative Risk Premiums

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Douglas D. Gregory
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The certainty-equivalent method of evaluating risky investments has been widely discussed in the literature ([2], [5], [14, p. 356], [19], [20]) and consists of applying a multiplicative factor, αt, to each period's expected cash flow, μt, to produce a certainty-equivalent flow, αtμt. The certainty-equivalent flow is then discounted with the riskless rate of interest, αtμt/(l + i)t. Although there has been much discussion of αt, researchers have not derived explicit expressions for αt, relying instead on ad hoc graphs [24, p. 328] or arguments involving mean-variance indifference curves [2] which may not even exist ([4], [12], [22], [23]). In this paper, I will (1) provide a rigorous definition of αt, (2) derive formal expressions for a for αt three special cases, (3) discuss relationships between αt and σt, the standard deviation of the period t cash flow, (4) formally derive the period t risk-adjusted discount rate, kt, from assumptions concerning the decision maker's (d. m.'s) risk preferences and cash flow distribution, and (5) apply the preceding results to a specific problem involving calculation of the risk-adjusted present value of an uncertain cash flow stream.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , December 1978, pp. 947 - 963
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arrow, K. J.Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Helsinki, Finland: Academic Book Store (1965).Google Scholar
[2]Bar-Yosef, S., and Meznick., R. “On Some Definitional Problems with the Method of Certainty Equivalents.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 5 (12 1977), pp. 1729–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bierman, H., and Smidt., S.The Capital Budgeting Decision, 3rd ed.New York: MacMillan (1971).Google Scholar
[4]Borch, Karl. “The Rationale of Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Comment.” American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3 (06 1974), pp. 428–30.Google Scholar
[5]Chen, Houng Yhi. “Valuation under Uncertainty. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 2 (09 1967), pp. 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]DeGroot, M.Optimal Statistical Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill (1970).Google Scholar
[7]Gordon, M.The Investment, Financing, and Valuation of the Corporation. Irwin (1962).Google Scholar
[8]Haley, C. W., and Schall., L. P.The Theory of Financial Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill (1973).Google Scholar
[9]Hammond, J. “Simplifying the Choice between Uncertain Prospects Where Preference is Nonlinear.” Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 7 (03 1974), pp. 1047–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hillier, F. S. “The Derivation of Probabilistic Information for the Evaluations of Risky Investments.” Management Science, Vol. 9, No. 3 (04 1963), pp. 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Keeney, R., and Raiffa., H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. John Wiley & Sons (1976).Google Scholar
[12]Levy, H. “The Rationale of Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Comment.” American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3 (06 1974), pp. 434–41.Google Scholar
[13]Levy, H., and Sarnat, M.Investment and Portfolio Analysis. John Wiley & Sons (1972).Google Scholar
[14]Mao, J. C. T. “Survey of Capital Budgeting: Theory and Practice.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, No. 3 (05 1970), pp. 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Mood, A.; Graybill, F.; and Boes, D.. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill (1974).Google Scholar
[16]Nachman, D. “Risk Aversion, Impatience and Optimal Timing Decisions.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 11, No. 2 (10 1975), pp. 196–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Pratt, J. G. “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large.” Econometrica, Vol. 32, No. 1–2 (01–04 1964), pp. 122–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Raiffa, H.Decision Analysis. Addison-Wesley (1968).Google Scholar
[19]Robichek, A., and Myers., S. “Conceptual Problems in the Use of Risk- Adjusted Discount Rates.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 21, No. 5 (12 1966), pp. 727–730.Google Scholar
[20]Robichek, A., and Myers, S.Optimal Financing Decisions. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall (1965).Google Scholar
[21]Spetzler, C. S. “The Development of a Corporate Risk Policy for Capital Investment Decisions.” IEEE Transactions on Systems and Cybernetics, Vol. SSC-4, No. 3 (09 1968), pp. 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Tsiang, S. C. “The Rationale for Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis, Skewness Preference, and the Demand for Money.” American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 3 (06 1972), pp. 354–71.Google Scholar
[23]Tsiang, S. C. “The Rationale for Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Reply.” American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3 (06 1974), pp. 442–50.Google Scholar
[24]Weston, J., and Brigham., E.Managerial Finance, 5th ed. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston (1975).Google Scholar