Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T16:35:33.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Diversification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Gordon Pye
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is widely assumed in portfolio theory that investors are risk-averse expected-utility maximizers. There is a good theoretical reason for assuming expected-utility maximization. Such behavior is well known to be consistent with several quite plausible postulates of rationality [5]. On the other hand, the main empirical foundation for such behavior in portfolio selection appears to be the observation of diversification. Risk-averse, expected-utility maximization implies diversification in portfolio selection, and investors are observed to diversify.

Information

Type
Communications
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1974, pp. 131 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bawa, V. “Minimax Policies for Selling a Non-divisible Asset.” Management Science: Theory, March 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Pye, G. “Minimax Policies for Selling an Asset and Dollar Averaging.” Management Science: Theory, March 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Pye, G. “Minimax Portfolio Policies.” Financial Analysts Journal, March–April 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Samuelson, P. “General Proof that Diversification Pays.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, September 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Von Neuman, J., and Morgenstern, O.. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1944.Google Scholar