Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T16:36:48.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Stock-Bond Return Relation, the Term Structure’s Slope, and Asset-Class Risk Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2014

Naresh Bansal
Affiliation:
nbansal@slu.edu, Cook School of Business, Saint Louis University, 3674 Lindell Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63108
Robert A. Connolly
Affiliation:
robert_connolly@unc.edu, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Campus Box 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Chris Stivers
Affiliation:
chris.stivers@louisville.edu, College of Business, University of Louisville, 2301 S 3rd St, Louisville, KY 40292.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We study whether asset-class risk dynamics can help explain the predominantly negative stock-bond return relation and movements in the term structure’s slope over 1997–2011. Using option-derived implied volatilities to measure risk, we find i) the negative stock-bond return relation largely disappears when controlling for risk movements, at both monthly and weekly horizons; ii) the partial relation between equity-risk changes and 10-year T-bond excess returns (term-slope movements) is reliably positive (negative); and iii) a stronger link between equity risk and stock returns implies a more negative stock-bond return correlation. Our results suggest a flight-to-quality influence between equity-risk dynamics and longer-term Treasury pricing.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2014