Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T20:29:34.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Problems in Portfolio Analysis: Conditional and Multiplicative Random Variables*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Guy V. G. Stevens
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to consider some problems arising in several applications of the theory of portfolio analysis pioneered by Markowitz [8] and Tobin [13]. This theory of asset choice under uncertainty has been applied to a large and growing set of problems beyond the original application to the selection of the investor's optimal portfolio, e.g., the capital budgeting decision of the firm (Lintner [7]), international capital flows (Grubel [5]), the choice of an export mix for a country (Brainard and Cooper [1] and the flow of direct investment (Stevens [12] and Prachowny [10]). In all applications a common element is the set of efficient portfolios which, in turn, is determined. by the set of moments—means, variances, and covariances—of the returns from the different assets that are. Considered for inclusion in the portfolio.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , December 1971, pp. 1235 - 1250
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Brainard, W.C., and Cooper, R. N.. “Uncertainty and Diversification in International Trade.” Studies in Agricultural Economics, Trade and Development. Stanford, Calif.: Food Research Institute, VIII, No. 3, 1968.Google Scholar
[2]Cramer, H.The Elements of Probability Theory. New York: Wiley, 1955.Google Scholar
[3]Farrar, D.The Investment Decision Under Uncertainty. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1961.Google Scholar
[4]Goodman, L. “On the Exact Variance of Products.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., LV, No. 292, December 1960), 708–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Grubel, H. “Internationally Diversified Portfolios.” A.E.R., LVIII, No. 5, Part 1, December 1968, 1299–1314.Google Scholar
[6]Kendall, M.G., and Stuart, A.. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. II. New York: Hafner, 1961.Google Scholar
[7]Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” R.E. Stat., XLVII, No. 1, February 1965, 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Markowitz, H.Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Cowles Foundation Monograph 16. New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
[9]Miller, N., and Whitman, M.. “A Mean-Variance Analysis of United States Long-term Portfolio Foreign Investment.” Q.J.E., LXXIV, No. 2, May 1970, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Prachowny, M.“Direct Investment and the Balance of Payments of the United States: A Portfolio Approach.”Paper presented at Universities-N.B.E.R. Conference on International Mobility and Movement of Capital,Washington, D.C., 1970 (multilithed).Google Scholar
[11]Stevens, G. “Risk and Return and the. Selection of Foreign Investments.” The Brookings Institution, February 1969 (multilithed).Google Scholar
[12]Stevens, G.“U.S. Direct Manufacturing Investment to Latin America: Some Economic and Political Determinants.”A.I.D. Research Paper.Washington, D.C.: A.I.D., June 1969 (multilithed).Google Scholar
[13]Tobin, J. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk.” R. Econ. Stud., XXVI, No. 1 February 1958, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar