Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T10:04:55.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

General stability conditions for a multi-layer model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

P. Ripa
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, 22800 Ensenada, Baja California, México and Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad National Autónoma de Mexico, 04510 Distrito Federal, México

Abstract

Sufficient conditions for the stability of steady solutions of a multi-layer model are found. The basic flow may be either parallel, axisymmetric or non-parallel. The lower boundary of the model may be either rigid, including the possibility of topography, or soft. The latter, ‘reduced gravity’, case represents an ideal situation in which the active layers are on top of an infinitely deep, motionless one.

Two conditions are sufficient to assure the stability of the basic flow. It is conjectured that unstable flows for which only the first or second condition is violated decay through Rossby-like or Poincaré-like growing perturbations, respectively.

In order to understand the meaning of both conditions, assume that a quite general O(α) ‘wave’ is superimposed on the basic flow: an O(α2) energy integral, δ2E can be calculated. This wave energy is neither conserved, because the wave might exchange energy with the O(a2) varying part of the the ‘mean flow’, nor positive definite, because the perturbation might lower the total energy by increasing the speed where it decreases the thickness, and vice versa. Now, the first condition determines that δ2E has an upper bound, and the second one implies that δ2E is positive definite; hence the stability of the basic solution. In the particular case of two-dimensional divergenceless flow, as well as for quasi-geostropic models, δ2E is a priori positive definite, and therefore the first condition suffices to guarantee the stability of the more basic solution. The conditions found here are indeed valid for more general perturbations, e.g. they prevent inertial (or 'symmetric’) instability, a phenomenon for which there is no distinction between wave and the varying part of the mean flow.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable