Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T21:31:49.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semigeostrophic theory as a Dirac-bracket projection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Rick Salmon
Rick Salmon
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography A025, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a general method for deriving approximate dynamical equations that satisfy a prescribed constraint typically chosen to filter out unwanted high frequency motions. The approximate equations take a simple general form in arbitrary phase-space coordinates. The family of semigeostrophic equations for rotating flow derived by Salmon (1983, 1985) fits this general form when the chosen constraint is geostrophic balance. More precisely, the semigeostrophic equations are equivalent to a Dirac-bracket projection of the exact Hamiltonian ønto the phase-space manifold corresponding to geostrophically balanced states. The more widely used quasi-geostrophic equations do not fit the general form and are instead equivalent to a metric projection of the exact dynamics on to the same geostrophic manifold. The metric, which corresponds to the Hamiltonian of the linearized dynamics, is an artificial component of the theory, and its presence explains why the quasi-geostrophic equations are valid only near a state isopycnals.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 196 , November 1988, pp. 345 - 358
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dirac, P. A. M. 1950 Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics. Can. J. Math. 2, 129–148.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. 1958 Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 246, 326–332.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. 1964 Lectures on Quantum Physics. Belfer.
Hanson, A., Regge, T. & Teitelboim, C. 1976 Constrained Hamiltonian systems. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, contribution 22.
Hoskins, B. J. 1975 The geostrophic momentum approximation and the semi-geostrophic equations. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 233–242.Google Scholar
Hoskins, B. J., McIntyre, M. E. & Robertson, A. W. 1985 On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 111, 877–946.Google Scholar
Leith, C. E. 1980 Nonlinear normal mode initialization and quasi-geostrophic theory. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 958–968.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1983 Practical use of Hamilton's principle. J. Fluid Mech. 132, 431–444.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1985 New equations for nearly geostrophic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 153, 461–477.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1988 Hamiltonian fluid mechanics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 225–256.Google Scholar
Schutz, B. F. 1980 Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Sudarshan, E. C. G. & Mukunda, N. 1983 Classical Dynamics: a Modern Perspective. Krieger.
Sundermeyer, K. 1982 Constrained Dynamics. Springer.