Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T07:19:44.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of angular misalignment on low-frequency axisymmetric wake instability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

V. Gentile*
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands
B. W. van Oudheusden
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands
F. F. J. Schrijer
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands
F. Scarano
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands
*
†Email address for correspondence: v.gentile@tudelft.nl

Abstract

The effect of angular misalignment on the low-frequency dynamics of the near wake of a blunt-based axisymmetric body is investigated at a Reynolds number of $Re=67\,000$ . While for axisymmetric boundary conditions all azimuthal orientations of the wake are explored with equal probability, resulting in a statistical axisymmetry, an angular offset as small as $0.2^{\circ }$ is found to suppress the low-frequency large-scale behaviour that is associated with the erratic meandering of the region of reversed flow. As a result of the misalignment, the centroid of this backflow region is displaced from the model axis and remains confined around an average off-centre position. Spectral and modal analysis provides evidence that the erratic backflow behaviour occurs within a narrow angular range of deviations from axisymmetric conditions.

Information

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1.Side and back view of the wind-tunnel model with coordinate system and field of view (FOV).

Figure 1

Figure 2.Mean streamlines at $y=0$ for small pitch angles $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$. The stagnation point on the base is indicated in red.

Figure 2

Figure 3.Colour contours of the mean out-of-plane velocity. The vectors plotted every fifth grid point represent the in-plane velocity components. The mean backflow centroid position in shown in white and the base edge is shown in grey.

Figure 3

Figure 4.Mean vertical position and root mean square (r.m.s.) of the relative displacement of the backflow centroid as a function of the pitch angle.

Figure 4

Figure 5.Scatter plots of the backflow centroid in-plane position for increasing pitch angle.

Figure 5

Figure 6.Probability distributions of the backflow relative displacement (a) and azimuthal position (b). The solid lines in (a) indicate the curve fits based on (1.2).

Figure 6

Figure 7.The model coefficient $a_{1}$ following from the curve fit to the experimental probability distribution of $s$.

Figure 7

Figure 8.(a) Probability distributions of backflow in-plane vertical position, where the solid lines represent the curve fits based on (3.2). (b) Bifurcation diagram depicting stable and unstable equilibrium positions and average vertical centroid positions of the full 2D data set as a function of the pitch angle.

Figure 8

Figure 9.Time history of the backflow centroid for different pitch angles: azimuthal position (a–c) and relative displacement (d–f).

Figure 9

Figure 10.Mean-square displacement of the backflow centroid as a function of the time interval $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}$.

Figure 10

Figure 11.Energy contribution of the first 10 POD modes.

Figure 11

Figure 12.Colour contours of the out-of-plane components of POD modes $k=1$ (a–d) and $k=2$ (e–h). The vectors plotted every fifth grid point represent the in-plane components $\sqrt{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}_{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D731}_{y}$ and $\sqrt{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}_{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D731}_{z}$.

Figure 12

Figure 13.Frequency spectra of POD time coefficients $c_{1}(t)$ and $c_{2}(t)$. The Strouhal number is defined as $St=fD/U_{\infty }$.