Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T15:55:12.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A general theory for two-dimensional vortex interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

David G. Dritschel
David G. Dritschel
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general theory for two-dimensional vortex interactions is developed from the observation that, under slowly changing external influences, an individual vortex evolves through a series of equilibrium states until such a state proves unstable. Once an unstable equilibrium state is reached, a relatively fast unsteady evolution ensues, typically involving another nearby vortex. During this fast unsteady evolution, a fraction of the original coherent circulation is lost to filamentary debris, and, remarkably, the flow reorganizes into a set of quasi-steady stable vortices.

The simplifying feature of the proposed theory is its use of adiabatic steadiness and marginal stability to determine the shapes and separation distance of vortices on the brink of an inelastic interaction. As a result, the parameter space for the inelastic interaction of nearby vortices is greatly reduced. In the case of two vortex patches, which is the focus of the present work, inelastic interactions depend only on a single parameter: the area ratio of the two vortices (taking the vorticity magnitude inside each to be equal). Without invoking adiabatic steadiness and marginal stability, one would have to contend with the additional parameters of vortex separation and shape, and the latter is actually an infinitude of parameters.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 293 , 25 June 1995, pp. 269 - 303
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aref, H. 1979 Motion of three vortices. Phys. Fluids 22, 393–400.Google Scholar
Benzi, R., Briscolini, M., Colella, M. & Santangelo, P. 1992 A simple point vortex model for two-dimensional decaying turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 4, 1036–1039.Google Scholar
Brachet, M. E., Meneguzzi, M., Politano, H. & Sulem, P. L. 1988 The dynamics of freely decaying two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 333–349.Google Scholar
Carnevale, G. F., McWilliams, J. C., Pomeau, Y., Weiss, J. B. & Young, W. R. 1991 Evolution of vortex statistics in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2735–2737.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1985 The stability and energetics of corotating uniform vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 157, 95–134.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1986 The nonlinear evolution of rotating configurations of uniform vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 172, 157–182.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1988a Contour surgery: a topological reconnection scheme for extended integrations using contour dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 77, 240–266.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1988b The repeated filamentation of two-dimensional vorticity interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 511–547.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1989a Contour dynamics and contour surgery: numerical algorithms for extended, high-resolution modelling of vortex dynamics in two-dimensional, inviscid, incompressible flows. Comput. Phys. Rep. 10, 77–146.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1989b Strain-induced vortex stripping. In Mathematical Aspects of Vortex Dynamics (ed. R. E. Caflisch), pp. 107–119. SIAM.
Dritschel, D. G. 1989c On the stabilization of a two-dimensional vortex strip by adverse shear. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 193–221.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1990 The stability of elliptical vortices in an external straining flow. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 223–261.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1993 Vortex properties of two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 5, 984–997.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G., Haynes, P. H., Juckes, M. N. & Shepherd, T. G. 1991 The stability of a two-dimensional vorticity filament under uniform strain. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 647–665.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. & Legras, B. 1991 The elliptical model of two-dimensional vortex dynamics. Part II: disturbance equations. Phys. Fluids A 3, 855–868.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. & Saravanan, R. 1994 Three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic contour dynamics, with an application to stratospheric vortex dynamics. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 120, 1267–1297.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. & Waugh, D. W. 1992 Quantification of the inelastic interaction of two asymmetric vortices in two-dimensional vortex dynamics. Phys. Fluids A 4, 1737–1744.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. & Zabusky, N. J. 1995 Toward a reduced model for nearly-inviscid unforced two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids (submitted).Google Scholar
Gröbli, W. 1877 Specielle Probleme über die Bewegung geradliniger paralleler Wirbelfáden. Zürich: Zürcher und Furrer. (Also published in Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, vol. 22, pp. 37–81; 129–165.)
Kamm, R. 1987 PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Legras, B. & Dritschel, D. G. 1993 Vortex stripping and the generation of high vorticity gradients in two-dimensional flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 51, 445–455.Google Scholar
Love, A. E. H. 1893 On the stability of certain vortex motions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 35, 18.Google Scholar
Mariotti, A., Legras, B. & Dritschel, D. G. 1994 Vortex stripping and erosion of coherent structures in two-dimensional flows. Phys. Fluids 6, 3954–3962.Google Scholar
McWilliams, J. C. 1990 The vortices of two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 361–385.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., McWilliams, J. C. & Zabusky, N. J. 1987 Axisymmetrization and vorticity gradient intensification of an isolated two-dimensional vortex through filamentation. J. Fluid Mech. 178, 137–159.Google Scholar
Overman, E. A. II 1986 Steady-state solutions of the Euler equations in two dimensions. II. Local Analysis of limiting V-states. SIAM J. Appl. Maths. 46, 765–800.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R. T. 1980 A family of steady, translating vortex pairs with distributed vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 129–144.Google Scholar
Polvani, L. M. & Dritschel, D. G. 1993 Nonlinear Vortex dynamics on the surface of the sphere: Equilibria and their stability. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 35–64.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1992 Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Santangelo, P., Benzi, R. & Legras, B. 1989 The generation of vortices in high-resolution, two-dimensional decaying turbulence and the influence of initial conditions on the breaking of self-similarity. Phys. Fluids A 1, 1027–1034.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. 1883 A Treatise on the Motion of Vortex Rings, pp. 94–108. Macmillan.
Waugh, D. W. 1992 The efficiency of symmetric vortex merger. Phys. Fluids A 4, 1745–1758.Google Scholar
Yao, H. B., Dritschel, D. G. & Zabusky, N. J. 1995 High-gradient phenomena in 2D vortex interactions. Phys. Fluids 7, 539–548.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N. J., Hughes, M. H. & Roberts, K. V. 1979 Contour dynamics for the Euler equations in two dimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 30, 96–106.Google Scholar