Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T17:59:19.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrodynamic interaction between two identical capsules in simple shear flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2007

ETIENNE LAC,
ARNAUD MOREL and
DOMINIQUE BARTHÈS-BIESEL
ETIENNE LAC
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6600, Biomécanique et Génie Biomédical, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, France
ARNAUD MOREL
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6600, Biomécanique et Génie Biomédical, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, France
DOMINIQUE BARTHÈS-BIESEL
Affiliation:
UMR CNRS 6600, Biomécanique et Génie Biomédical, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We present a numerical model of the hydrodynamic interactions between two capsules freely suspended in a simple shear flow. The capsules are identical and each consists of a liquid droplet enclosed by a thin hyperelastic membrane, devoid of bending resistance and obeying a neo-Hookean constitutive law. The two capsules are slightly prestressed with a given inflation ratio in order to avoid the small deformation instability due to compression observed for a single capsule in simple shear flow. The viscosity ratio between the interior and exterior fluids of the capsule is taken to be unity and creeping flow conditions are assumed to prevail. The boundary-element method is used with bi-cubic B-splines as basis functions on a structured mesh in order to discretize the capsule surface. A new method using two grids with initially orthogonal pole axes is developed to eliminate polar singularities in the load calculation and to allow for long computation times. Two capsules suspended in simple shear flow usually have different velocities and thus eventually pass each other. We study this crossing process as a function of flow strength and initial particle separation. We find that hydrodynamic interactions during crossing lead to large shape alterations, elevated elastic tensions in the membrane and result in an irreversible trajectory shift of the capsules. Furthermore, a tendency towards buckling is observed, particularly during the separation phase where large pressure differences occur. Our results are in qualitative agreement with those obtained for a pair of interacting liquid droplets but show the specific role played by the membrane of capsules.

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 573 , February 2007, pp. 149 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

References

REFERENCES

Barthès-Biesel, D. & Rallison, J. M. 1981 The time-dependent deformation of a capsule freely suspended in a linear shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthès-Biesel, D., Diaz, A. & Dhenin, E. 2002 Effect of constitutive laws for two-dimensional membranes on flow-induced capsule deformation. J. Fluid Mech. 460, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972 The hydrodynamic interaction of two small freely-moving spheres in a linear flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyiannis, G. & Pozrikidis, C. 2001 Simple shear flow of suspensions of elastic capsules. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 13, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, K. S. & Olbricht, W. L. 1993 Experimental studies of the deformation and breakup of a synthetic capsule in steady and unsteady simple shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 250, 609–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, R. & Pozrikidis, C. 1998 Signicance of the dispersed-phase viscosity on the simple shear flow of suspensions of two-dimensional liquid drops. J. Fluid Mech. 365, 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guido, S. & Simeone, M. 1998 Binary collision of drops in shear flow by computer-assisted video optical microscopy. J. Fluid Mech. 357, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lac, E. & Barthès-Biesel, D. 2005 Deformation of a capsule in simple shear flow: effect of membrane prestress. Phys. Fluids 17, 072105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lac, E., Barthès-Biesel, D., Pelekasis, N. A. & Tsamopoulos, J. 2004 Spherical capsules in three-dimensional unbounded Stokes flow: effect of the membrane constitutive law and onset of buckling. J. Fluid Mech. 516, 303–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenberg, M. & Hinch, E. J. 1997 Collision of two deformable drops in shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 338, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 1992 Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 1995 Finite deformation of liquid capsules enclosed by elastic membranes in simple shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 297, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 2003 Modelling and Simulation of Capsules and Biological Cells. Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanujan, S. & Pozrikidis, C. 1998 Deformation of liquid capsules enclosed by elastic membranes in simple shear flow: large deformations and the effect of capsule viscosity. J. Fluid Mech. 361, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwood, J. D., Risso, F., Collé-Paillot, F., Edwards-Lévy, F. & Lévy, M. C. 2003 Transport rates through a capsule membrane to attain Donnan equilibrium. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 263, 202–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skalak, R., Tozeren, A., Zarda, R. P. & Chien, S. 1973 Strain energy function of red blood cell membranes. Biophys. J. 13, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Ven, T. G. & Mason, S. G. 1976 Pairs of interacting spheres in shear flow. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 57, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, A., Rehage, H. & Leonhard, H. 2000 Shear-induced deformation of polyamid microcapsules. Colloid Polymer Sci. 278, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, A., Rehage, H. & Leonhard, H. 2001 Shear induced deformation of microcapsules: shape oscillations and membrane folding. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Engng Aspects 183–185, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar