Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T15:21:58.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inverse formulation and finite difference solution for flow from a circular orifice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Roland W. Jeppson
Roland W. Jeppson
Affiliation:
Utah Water Research Laboratory, College of Engineering, Utah State University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The problem of flow from a large reservoir through a circular orifice is formulated by considering the velocity potential and Stokes's stream function as the independent variables and the radial and axial dimensions as the dependent variables, and a finite difference solution is obtained to the resulting boundary-value problem. This inverse formulation has the advantage over a finite difference solution in the physical plane that the region of flow is rectangular and consequently well adapted for minimum logic in programming a digital computer. The inverse finite difference solution is more readily obtained than a comparable solution in the physical plane, even though the inverse partial differential equation and associated boundary conditions are non-linear. The results from the inverse finite difference solution are in close agreement with other most recent results from approximate solutions to this problem.

The inverse method of solution is applicable to other free streamline as well as confined axisymmetric potential flow problems. The essential difference in other problems will be in the boundary conditions.Keywords: Orifice, Finite Differences, Non-linear Partial Differential Equation, Potential Flow.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , 14 January 1970, pp. 215 - 223
Copyright
© 1970 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cassidy, J. J. 1965 Irrotational flow over spillways of finite height. J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE 91, 155–74.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. E. & Wasow, W. R. 1960 Finite-difference Methods for Partial Differential Equations. New York: Wiley.
Garabedian, P. 1956 Calculation of axially symmetric cavities and jets. Pacific J. Math. 6, 611–84.Google Scholar
Hunt, B. W. 1968 Numerical solution of an integral equation for flow from a circular orifice. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 361–77.Google Scholar
Jeppson, R. W. 1968 Axisymmetric seepage through homogeneous and nonhomogeneous porous mediums. Water Resources Research, AGU 4, 1277–88.Google Scholar
Jeppson, R. W. 1969 Free-surface flow through heterogeneous porous media. J. Hydraulics Div. ASCE 95, 363–81.Google Scholar
Markland, E. 1965 Calculation of flow at a free overfall by relaxation methods. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Lond. 31, May.Google Scholar
Rouse, H. & Abul-Fetouh, A. 1950 Characteristics of irrotational flow through axially symmetric orifice. J. Appl. Mech. 17, 117–61.Google Scholar
Southwell, R. & Vaisey, G. 1948 Relaxation methods applied to engineering problems. XII. Fluid motions characterized by free streamlines. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 240, 117–61.Google Scholar
Stanitz, J. D. 1953 Design of two-dimensional channels with prescribed velocity distributions along the channel walls. NACA, Tech. Rep. 1115.Google Scholar
Thom, A. & Apelt, C. J. 1961 Field Computations in Engineering and Physics. London: Van Nostrand.
Trefftz, E. 1916 Über die Kontraktion Kreisformiger Flüssigkeitssrahlen. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, 64, 34–61.Google Scholar