Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T17:17:25.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A theory of steady breakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Raymond Cointe and
Marshall P. Tulin
Raymond Cointe
Affiliation:
Ocean Engineering Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USAPresent address: Mission Interministérielle de l’Effet de Serre, Ministère de l’Environnement, 20, Avenue de Ségur, 75302 Paris 07 SP, France.
Marshall P. Tulin
Affiliation:
Ocean Engineering Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mechanics of the quasi-steady breaking wave created above a submerged hydrofoil, first studied experimentally by Duncan (1981), is elucidated here. It is an example of a flow wherein the resistance of the body manifests itself in a detached separation eddy located away from the body (i.e. on the free surface). As we show, the conditions for inception of separation and the prediction of the breaking configuration follow from simple considerations, without extensive calculation.

The physical model of the breaker, based on observations, consists of an essentially stagnant eddy riding on the forward face of the leading wave in the wave train behind the hydrofoil. This eddy is sustained by turbulent stresses acting in the shear zone separating the eddy and the underlying flow. These stresses result in a trailing turbulent wake just beneath the water surface. The breaker eddy contains air entrained at breaking, and the degree of aeration is a parameter of the problem.

The eddy—breaker model is quantified utilizing independent measurements of turbulent shear stress in shear zones. It is then shown that the hydrostatic pressure acting on the dividing streamline underneath the eddy creates a trailing wave which largely cancels the trailing wave that would exist in the absence of breaking. The ‘wave’ resistance of the hydrofoil then manifests itself in the momentum flux of the residual trailing wave, plus the momentum flux in the breaker wake, i.e. the breaker resistance.

For a fixed hydrofoil speed the total momentum flux, or resistance, in the presence of breaking is shown to have a minimum corresponding to a particular value of the trailing-wave steepness. It is thus concluded that the wave resistance must exceed this value for breaking to ensue. For hydrofoil resistance in excess of this minimum, both a weak and strong breaker would seem to exist. It is shown, however, that the weak breaker is unstable. It is also shown that a maximum steady breaking resistance exists, limited by the size of the breaker and dependent on the extent of its aeration.

Good quantitative comparisons between theory and experiments are shown.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 276 , 10 October 1994, pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arie, M. & Rouse, H. 1956 Experiments on two-dimensional flow over a normal wall. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 129–141.Google Scholar
Banner, M. L. 1987 Surging characteristics of spilling zones of quasi-steady breaking water waves. In Proc. IUTAM Symp. Nonlinear Water Waves. Springer.
Banner, M. L. & Phillips, O. M. 1974 On the incipient breaking of small scale waves. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 647–656.Google Scholar
Battjes, J. A. & Sakai, T. 1981 Velocity field in a steady breaker. J. Fluid Mech. 111, 421–437.Google Scholar
Cointe, R. 1987 A theory of breakers and breaking waves. PhD dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara.
Cointe, R. 1989 Quelques aspects de la simulation numérique d’un canal à houle. Thèse de Doctorat, Ecole National des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris (in French).
Cokelet, E. D. 1977 Steep gravity waves in water of arbitrary uniform depth. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 286, 183–230.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 1981 An experimental investigation of breaking waves produced by a towed hydrofoil. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 377, 331–348.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 1982 A note on the evaluation of the wave resistance of two-dimensional bodies from measurements of the downstream wave profile. J. Ship Res. 27, 90–92.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 1983 The breaking and non-breaking resistance of a two-dimensional hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 507–520.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics. Dover.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1969 Action of a variable stress at the surface of water waves. Phys. Fluids 12, 737–740.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1973 A model of flow separation at a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 57, 129–148.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1975 Integral properties of periodic gravity waves of finite amplitude. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 342, 157–174.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Turner, J. S. 1974 An ‘entraining plume’ model of a spilling breaker. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 1–20.Google Scholar
Mori, K. 1986 Sub-breaking waves and critical conditions for their appearance. J. Soc. Naval Archit. Japan 159, 1–8.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. & Svendsen, I. A. 1978 Spilling breakers, bores and hydraulic jumps. In Proc. 16th Coastal Engng Conf., Hamburg, Germany, pp., 540–550.
Phillips, O. M. 1985 Spectral and statistical properties of the equilibrium range in wind generated gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 156, 505–531.Google Scholar
Tollmien, W. 1926 Berechnung turbulenter Ausbeitungovargänge. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. IV, 468.Google Scholar
Tulin, M. P. & Cointe, R. 1986 A theory of spilling breakers. Proc. 16th Symp. Naval Hydrodynamics, Berkeley, pp. 93–105. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Tulin, M. P. & Cointe, R. 1987 Steady and unsteady spilling breakers: theory. In Proc. IUTAM Symp. Nonlinear Water Waves. Springer.
Tulin, M. P. & Hsu, C. C. 1980 New applications of cavity flow theory. In Proc. 13th Symp. Naval Hydrodynamics, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 107–131. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Tulin, M. P. & Li, J. J. 1992 On the breaking of energetic waves. Intl J. Offshore Polar Engng 2, 46–53.Google Scholar