Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-w5jd6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-03T10:22:13.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: première partie1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Albert Di Cristo
Albert Di Cristo
Affiliation:
Institut de Phonétique, Universit´ de Provence, 29, avenue R. Schuman, 13621, Aix-en-Provence CEDEX, Francealbert.dicristo@lpl.univ_aix.fr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nous proposons d'effectuer dans cette étude un large tour d'horizon des problèmes liés à l'interprétation de l'accent en général et de l'accentuation du français contemporain en particulier. Cet « état des lieux » (première partie) débouche sur l'esquisse d'une modélisation du cadre accentuel du français (seconde partie) fondée sur une classification fonctionnelle des catégories d'accentuation et la mise en œuvre généralisée du principe de bipolarisation accentuelle qui permet, selon nous, de rendre compte du caractère probabilitaire de l'accentuation du français et de la variabilité de ses des motifs rythmiques attestés dans les formes prosodiques de surface.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , September 1999 , pp. 143 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

RÉFÉRENCES

Abercrombie, D. (1964) Syllable quantity and enclitics in English. In Abercrombie, D. et al. , (eds), In Honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longmans pp. 216–22.Google Scholar
Allen, G.D. (1975) Speech rhythm: its relation to performance universals and articulatory timing. Journal of Phonetics, 3: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M. et Ewen, C. J. (1987) Principles of Dependency Phonology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1964) A metrical interpretation of some traditional claims about quantity and stress. In Aronoff, M., et Oehrle, R. T., (eds). Language Sound Structure. MIT Press pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
Astesano, C., Di Cristo, A. et Hirst, D. (1995) Discourse-based empirical evidence for a multi-class accent system in French. Proceedings of the xiiith International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Stockholm), vol. 4: 630–3.Google Scholar
Astesano, C., Espesser, R., Flachaire, E. et Nicolas, P. (1997) Tonal configurations of prominence in French. Proceedings of the ESCA workshop: Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications. (University of Athens): 29–32.Google Scholar
Auer, P. et Di Luzio, A. (1992) The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bally, C. (1926) Le rythme linguistique et sa signification sociale. Compte rendu du ter congrès du rythme (Genève): 253–63.Google Scholar
Basbøll, H. (1981) On the function of boundaries in phonological rules. In Goyvaerts, D. L. (ed.). Phonology in the 1980s. Ghent: Story-Scientia: 245–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. (1986) Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. (1992) Evidence for speech rhythms across languages. In Tohkura, Y. et al. , (eds). Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure. Tokyo: IOS Press pp- 457–63.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. (1993) Modeling the production of prosody. Working Papers (Dept. of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund), 41: 258–61.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. (1996) The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes, II (1/2): 17–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. et Pierrehumbert, J. (1986) Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3: 255–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. et Edwards, J. (1992) Intonational categories and the articulatory control of duration. In Tohkura, Y. et al. , (eds). Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure, Tokyo: IOS Press pp. 359–76.Google Scholar
Benguerel, P. (1973) Corrélats physiologiques de l'accent en français. Phonetica, 27: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1966) La notion de rythme dans son expression linguistique. In Problèmes de Linguistique Générate, Paris: Gallimard: 327–35.Google Scholar
Berinstein, A. E. (1979) A Cross-Linguistic Study on the Perception and Production of Stress. Working Papers in Phonetics, 47: 59.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. (1989) Reflections on the dichotomy ‘stress’ vs. ‘syllable-timing’. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 91–92–93: 99–130.Google Scholar
Birch, S. et Clifton, C. Jr (1995) Focus, accent and argument structure: effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech, 38 (4): 365: 91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, D. (1992) Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933) Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1958) A theory of pitch accent in English. Word, 14: 109–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1961) Generality, Gradience and the All-or-None, La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1972) Accent is predictable (if you're a mind-reader). Language, 48: 633–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1978) Intonation across languages. In Greenberg, J. (ed.). Universals of Human Languages, vol. II: Phonology. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press pp. 471–524.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1985) Two views of accent. Journal of Linguistics, 21: 79–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1986) Intonation and its Parts. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruce, G. (1985) Structures and function of prosody. In Guérin, B., et Carré, R., (eds). Proceedings of the French-Swedish Seminar on Speech (Grenoble, Fr.) pp. 549–59.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. N. (1992) Multi-Leuel Speech Timing Control. PhD. Thesis. University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. N. et Beckman, M. (1997) Stress, prominence and spectral tilt. Proceedings of the ESCA workshop: Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications (University of Athens) pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
Caplan, D. (1992) Language. Structure Processing and Disorders. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carton, F. (1971) L'accent d'insistance en français contemporain. Actes du XIIIe Congrès International de Linguistique Romane (Québec) pp. 205–19.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, R. S., (ed.). Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, Typological Studies in Language, II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co. pp. 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, B. (1981) Poetic and musical rhythm: one more time. In Browne, R., (ed.). Music Theory. Special Topics, New York: Academic Press pp. 33–57.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. et Halle, M. (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Coleman, H. (1914) Intonation and emphasis. Miscellanea Phonetica, 1: 6–26.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. et Eady, S. (1986) Metrical phonology in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 35: 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993) English Speech Rhythm. Form and Function in Everiday Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristophe, A. (1993) Rôle de la Prosodie dans la Segmentation en Mots. Thèse de Doctorat. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1992) The origins of nucleus. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 20: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, P. et Rochemont, M. (1983) Stress and focus in English. Language, 59: 123–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (1987) Speaking for listening. In Allport, A., Mackay, D. G., Prinz, W., et Scheerer, E., (eds). Language Perception and production, New York: Academic Press pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. et Foss, D. K. (1977) On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing. Language and Speech, 20: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A. et Ladd, D. R. (1983) Prosody: Modeb and Measurements, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahan, F. et Bernard, J. M. (1996) Interspeaker variability in emphatic accent production in French. Language and Speech, 39 (4): 341–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauer, R. M. (1983) Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalysed. Journal of Phonetics, 11: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauzat, A. (1936) Commentaires de l'article de Gill, 1936: Remarques sur l'accent tonique en français contemporain. Le Français Moderne, 4: 316–17.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E. (1995) Towards a dynamic model of the prosodic structure. Paper presented at HILP 2, Amsterdam, 25–27 janv. 1995 p. 28.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1938) L'accent final en français: accent d'intensité, accent de hauteur, accent de durée. French Review, 12 (2): 141–5.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1940) Le mot est-il une entité phonétique en français. Le Français Moderne, 8–1: 47–56.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1966) Les dix intonations de base du français. French Review, 40, 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1969) An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics, VII (4): 295–325.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1984) L'accentuation dans les phrases en français. In Dell, F., Hirst, D. J., et Vergnaud, J. R., (eds). Forme Sonore du Langage. Paris: Hermann pp. 65–122.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. (1975) Recherches sur la structuration prosodique de la phrase française. Actes des бèmes Joumées d'Etudes sur la parole (Aix-en-Provence) pp. 95–116.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. (1978) De la microprosodie à l'intonosyntaxe, Thèse de doctorat d'Etat, Université de Provence. Publiée en 1985, Publications de l'Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. (1981) Aspects phonétiques et phonologiques des éléments prosodiques. Modèles Linguistiques, iii (2): 24–83.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. (1998) Intonation in French. In Hirst, D. J., et Di Cristo, A., (eds) Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. (à paraître) Focalisations et dispositifs prosodiques en français. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix, 19.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. et Chafcouloff, M. (1975) Contribution à l'étude du comportement prosodique des pronoms sujets en fran¸ais contemporain. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix. 2: 1–137.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. et Hirst, D. J. (1993) Rythme syllabique, rythme mélodique et représentation hiérarchique de la prosodie du français. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix, 15: 9–24.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. et Hirst, D. J. (1996) Vers une typologie des unités intonatives du français. Actes des xxies Journées d'Etudes sur la Parole, (Avignon, 10–14 juin 1996) pp. 219–22.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. et Hirst, D. J. (1997) L'accent non-emphatique en français: stratégies et paramètres. Polyphonie pour I. Fónagy. Paris: l'Harmattan pp. 71–101.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A., Di Cristo, P. et Veronis, J. (1997) A metrical model of rhythm and intonation for French text-to-speech synthesis. Proceedings of the ESCA workshop: Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications (University of Athens) pp. 83–6.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. (1996) Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics, 26: 475–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duez, D. (1978) Essai sur la prosodie du discours politique. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Paris III.Google Scholar
Durand, J. (1986) Dependency and Non-Linear Phonology. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Durand, J. (1990) Generative and Non-Linear Phonology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Eefting, W. (1991) The effect of information value and accentuation on the duration of Dutch words, syllables, and segments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89: 412–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encrevé, P. (1988) La liaison avec et sans enchaînement, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Epstein, D. (1995) Shaping Time: Music, the Brain, and Performance. New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
Fant, C., Kruckenberg, A. et Nord, L. (1990) Segmental durations within a prosodie frame in Swedish, French and English. Phonum, 1: 42–5.Google Scholar
Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A. et Nord, L. (1991) Durational correlates of stress in Swedish, French and English. Journal of Phonetics, 19: 351–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fant, G. et Kruckenberg, A. (1994) Notes on stress and word accent in Swedish. Speech Transmission Laboratory. Quarterly Progress Status Report, 2/3: 125–44.Google Scholar
Farnetani, E. et Kori, S. (1981) Italian lexical stress in connected speech. Proceedings of the 4th F.A.S.E. Symposium (Roma): 57–61.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. (1991) Rhythm and final lengthening in French. Journal of Phonetics, 19: 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1949) Déplacement de l'accent d'intensité dans les langues romanes. Thèse de Doctorat (en hongrois), Budapest: Université L. Eötvös.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1980) L'accent en français: accent probabilitaire. In Fónagy, I., et Léon, P. R., (eds). L'Accent en français contemporain, Studia Phonetica, 15: 123–233.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1989) Le françcais change de visage? Revue Romane, 24 (2): 225–54.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. et Fónagy, J. (1976) Prosodie professionnelle et changements prosodiques. Le Français Modeme, 44: 193–228.Google Scholar
Fouché, P. (1933–1934) L'évolution phonétique du français du xvie siècle à nos jours. Le Français Modeme, 1–2: 217–36.Google Scholar
Fouché, P. (1936) Les diverses sortes de français au point de vue phonétique. Le Français Moderne, 4: 199–216.Google Scholar
Fougeron, C. et Jun, S. A. (1996) Rates effects on French intonation: prosodie organisation and phonetic realization. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 94: 26–51.Google Scholar
Fraisse, P. (1956) Les structures rythmiques. Studia Psychologica, Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Fraisse, P. (1974) Psychologie du rythme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Garde, P. (1965) Accentuation et morphologie. La Linguistique, 2: 25–39.Google Scholar
Garde, P. (1967) Contraste accentuel et contraste intonationnel. Word, 23: 187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garde, P. (1968) L'Accent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Garde, P. (1973) Principles of the synchronic description of stress. In Fudge, E. C., (ed). Phonology, Harmondsworth: Penguin: 309–19.Google Scholar
Gill, A. (1936) Remarques sur l'accent tonique en français contemporain. Le Français Moderne, 4: 311–18.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1982) Accent systems. In van der Hulst, , et Smith, N.The Structure of Phonological Representation, Dordrecht: Foris pp. 47–63.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1990) Autosegmental et Metrical Phonology. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grammont, M. (1914) Traité pratique de prononciation française. (ie éd.) Paris: Delagrave (9e éd: 1938).Google Scholar
Grammont, M. (1923) L'accent d'insistance. Mélanges offerts à P. Boyer pp. 18–25.Google Scholar
Grammont, M. (1963) Traité de phonétique. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. et Sidner, C. (1986) Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12 (3): 175–204.Google Scholar
Grover, C. N. et Terken, J. M. B. (1995) The role of stress and accent in the perception of speech rhythm. IPO Annual Progress Report, 30: 30–50.Google Scholar
Guaïtella, I. (1991) Rythme et parole: comparaison critique du rythme de la lecture oralisée et de la parole spontanée. Thèse de Doctorat. Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1983) Focus, mode and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics, 19: 377–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. (1946) Colloquial French phonology. Studies in Linguistics, 4: 70–90.Google Scholar
Halle, M. et Vergnaud, J. R. (1987) An Essai on Stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, M. et Isdardi, W. (1995) Stress and metrical structure. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.). The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Cambridge et Oxford: Blackwell: 403–43.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1984) Constraining Metrical Theory: a Modular theory of Rhythm, and Destressing. PhD. Dissertation. UCLA.Google Scholar
Hart't, J. et Collier, R. (1975) Integrating different levels of intonation analysis. Journal of Phonetics, 3: 235–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (1981) A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules. Indiana University Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1982) Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 13: 227–76.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1983) A grid based theory of English meter. Linguistic Inquiry, 14: 357–94.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1984) The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15: 33–74Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995) Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. J. (1977) Intonative Features, La Haye: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, D. J. (1989) Review of: « Relevance: Communication and Cognition ». Mind and Language, 4: 138–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, D. (1993) Peak, boundary and cohesion characteristics of prosodic grouping. Working Papers (Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund), 41: 32–7.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. J. et Di Cristo, A. (1984) French intonation: a parametric approach. Die Neueren Sprachen, 83 (5): 554–69.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. J. et Di Cristo, A. (1986) Unités tonales et unités rythmiques dans la représentation de l'intonation. Actes des 15 es joumées d'Etudes sur la parole (Aix-en-Provence): 93–5.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. J. et Di Cristo, A. (1996) Y a-t-il des unités tonales en français? Actes des xxiesn joumées d'Etudes sur la Parole, (Avignon, 10–14 juin 1996): 223–6.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. J. et Di Cristo, A. (1998) A survey on intonation systems. In Hint, D. J., et Di Cristo, A., (eds): Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. J., Di Cristo, A. et Espesser, R. (sous presse). Levels of description and levels of representation in the analysis of intonation. In Home, M., (ed.) Phonological and Prosodic Analysis. Dordrecht: KJuwer (in Press).Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1936–1937) Accent, intonation, quantité. Studi Baltici, 66: 1–57.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. et McCully, C. B. (1987) Metrical Phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horne, M. (1978) On French stress and intonation. Unpublished Ms., Lund University Pp. 23.Google Scholar
Hulst van der, H. et Smith, N. (1988) The variety of pitch accent systems. In Van der Hulst, et Smith, (eds). Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent, Dordrecht: Foris: ix–xxiii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. (1975) Phonology: Theory and Analysis, New York: Chicago: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1977) On the nature of linguistic stress. Southern Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 4: 37–82.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1978) Tone and/or accent. In Napoli, D. J. (ed.). Elements of Tone, Stress and Intonation, Washington DC; Georgetown University Press: 1–20.Google Scholar
Idsardi, J. (1992) The Computation of Prosody. PhD. Dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
Jankowski, L. (1996) Le marquage prosodique des mots, Mémoire de Maîtrise: Institut de Phonétique, Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1931) Die Betonung und ihre Rolle in der Wort-und Syntagma-phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 4. Reprinted in R. Jakobson (1962), Selected Writings I, La Haye: Mouton: 117–36.Google Scholar
Jun, S. A. et Fougeron, C. (1995) The accentual phrase and the prosodic structure of French. Proceedings of the xiiith International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Stockholm), 2: 722–5.Google Scholar
Jun, S. A. et Fougeron, C. (1997) A phonological model of French intonation: introducing an intermediate phrase. Paper submitted to the ESCA workshop on Intonation (Athens, Sept. 1997).Google Scholar
Kager, R. (1995a) The metrical theory of word stress. In Goldsmith, J., (ed.). The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kager, R. (1995b) Review of: Hayes, B., 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Phonology, 12: 437–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1980) L'Enonciation: de la subjectivité dans le langage, Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Klausenburger, J. (1970) French Prosodies and Phonotactics. An Historical Typology. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1980) The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1991) Integrating syntagmatic and paradigmatic aspects of stress. proceedings of the xiith international Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Aix-en-Provence), vol. 1: 283–7.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1993) Notes on the phonology of prominence. Working Papers (Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund, Sweden), 41: 10–15.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1996) Intonational Phonology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1997) The perception of intonational emphasis: continuous or categorical? fournal of Phonetics, 25: 313–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, B. (1988) Des grilles et des arbres. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 17: 135–95.Google Scholar
Laks, B. (1993a) La constituance revisitée. In Laks, B. et Plénat, M. (ed). De Natura Sonorum. Presses Universitaires de Vincennes pp. 173–220.Google Scholar
Laks, , (1993b) Constituance et métrique. In Laks, B. et Rialland, A. (eds). Architecture des Représentations Phonologiques. éditions du CNRS: 25–59.Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1982) Metrical or autosegmental. In van der Hulst, , et Smith, N., The Structure of Phonological Representation. Dordrecht: Foris pp. 177–90.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1970) Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Léon, P. (1971) Systématique des fonctions expressives de l'intonation. In Léon, P., Essais de phonostylistique, Montréal, Paris: Didier pp. 43–56.Google Scholar
Léon, P. (1992) Phonétisme et prononcialion du français. Chap. 9, Paris: Nathan Université.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass.,: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. (1975) The Intonational System of English. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. New York: Garland (1979).Google Scholar
Liberman, M. et Prince, A. (1977) On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 2: 249–335.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1990) Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H Theory. In Hardcastle, W., et Marchal, A., (eds). Speech Production and Speech Modelling, Dordrecht: Kluwer pp. 403–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucci, V. (1983) Etude phonétique du français contemporain à travers la variation situation-nelle. Publications de l'Université de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Lyche, C. et Dirard, F. (1995) Le mot retrouvé. Lingua, 95 (1–3): 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, B. (1996) Analyse des faits prosodiques: problèmes et méthodes. Cahiers de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée. 3: 99–107.Google Scholar
Marouzeau, J. (1924) Accent affectif et accent intellectuel. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, xxv: 79–86.Google Scholar
Marouzeau, J. (1956) Accent de mot et accent de phrase. Le Français Moderne, 4: 241–8.Google Scholar
Martin, J. G. (1972) Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review, 79: 487–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P. (1987) Prosodic and rhythmic structures in French. Linguistics, 25: 925–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, A. (1954) Accents et tons. Miscellanea Phonetica, 2: 13–24. repris dans La linguistique synchronique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France pp. 141–61.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1965) Eléments de linguistique générate. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1969) Le Français sansfard. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. et Prince, A. (1990) Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural, NLLT, 8: 209–83.Google Scholar
McClave, E. (1994) Gestural beats: the rhythm hypothesis. Journal of the Psycholinguistic Research, 23 (1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, J. M. et Cutler, A. (1997) Cognitive processes in Speech perception. In Hardcastle, W. J., et Laver, J., The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1937) Mluvni takt a nekteré problémy pribuzné. (Des groupes ryhtmiques et de quelques problèmes connexes), Slovo aSlovesnost, iii: 193–9.Google Scholar
Mazaleyrat, J. (1974) Eléments de métrique française. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Mertens, P. (1991) Local prominence of acoustic and psychoacoustic functions and perceived stress in French. Proceedings of the xiith International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Aix-en-Provence), vol. 3: 218, 221.Google Scholar
Mertens, P. (1992) L'accentuation des syllabes contiguës. Institut vor Toegepaste Liiigiiistik, 95/96 pp. 145–65.Google Scholar
Mertens, P. (1993a) Accentuation, intonation et morphosyntaxe. Travaux de Linguistique (Louvain), 26: 21–69.Google Scholar
Mertens, P. (1993b) Intonational grouping, boundaries and syntactic structure in French. Working Papers (Dept. of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University), 41: 156–9.Google Scholar
Meschonnic, H. (1982) Critique du rythme. Paris: Lagrasse, Verdier.Google Scholar
Milner, J. C. et Regnault, F. (1987) Dire le vers. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Monaghan, A. I. C.What determines accentuation? Journal of Pragmatics, 19: 559–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, Y. C. et Kaye, J. (1982). The syntactic bases for French liaison. Journal of Linguistics, 18: 291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M. et Vogel, I. (1986) Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nyrop, K. (1925) Manuel de phonétique du français parlé. 4e éd.New-York: Stechert, 8e ed. Gydendal (1963).Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1977) The physiology of stress. In Hyman, L. M., (ed.), Studies in Stress and Accent, Southern California Papers in Linguistics, 4: 145–68.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. (1922) English Intonation, with Systematic Exercices. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Pasdeloup, V. (1990) Modèle de règles rythmiques du français appliqué à la synthèse de la parole. Thèse de doctorat, Universitè de Provence.Google Scholar
Passy, P. (1890) Etudes sur les changements phonétiques. Paris: Didot.Google Scholar
Pensom, R. (1993) Accent and metre in French. French Language Studies, 3: 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S. (1995) Enclitic stress in Romance. Proceedings of the Parasession on Clitics, Chicago Linguistic Society, 31.Google Scholar
Pernot, H. (1929–1930) L'Intonation. Revue de Phonétique, 6: 273–89.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980) The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD Thesis, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, publiée en 1988 par Indiana University Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Pike, K. (1945) The Intonation of American English. University of Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994) The Language Instinct. London: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, M. (1934) From Latin to Modern French. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pilch, H. (1973) La mélodie dans les structures linguistiques. Bulletin d'Audiophonologie, 3 (1): 1–64.Google Scholar
Pius, Servien (1930) Les rythmes comme introduction physique à l'esthétique. Paris: Boivin et Cie.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1981) Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, P. (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press pp. 223–55.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1983) Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 1: 19–100.Google Scholar
Prince, A. et Smolensky, (1993) Optimality Theory: Constraints Interaction in Generative Grammar. Ms, Newbrunswick: Rutgers University; Boulder: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Pulgram, E. (1965) Prosodic systems: French, Lingua, 13: 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulgram, E. (1967) Trends and predictions. In Honor to Roman Jakobson: 1641.Google Scholar
Pulgram, E. (1970) Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus. La Haye: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, A. C. M. (1980) Word boundaries in the French language. Language and Speech, 23, 3: 189–96.Google Scholar
Rigault, A. (1970) L'accent secondaire de mot en français: mythe ou réalité? Actele celui de-al xu-le Congres International de Linvistica si Filologie Romanica, 1: 285–90.Google Scholar
Ronat, M. (1984) Logical form and prosodic islands. In Gibbon, D., et Richter, H., (eds). Intonation, Accent and Rhythm, Walter de Gruyter: Berlin: 311–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M. (1970) L'accent, le mot et ses limites. Les Nouvelles Perspectives en Phonétique, Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles: 81–6.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. (1980) Le français contemporain. Paris: Didier, Studia Phonetica, 15: 13–51.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. (1981) Le cadre accentuel et le mot en italien et en français. In Léon, P., et Rossi, M. (1981) Problèmes deprosodie. Studia Phonetica, Paris: Didier, 1: 9–22.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. (1985) L'intonation et l'organisation de l'énoncé. Phonetica, 42: 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M. (1993) A model for predicting the prosody of spontaneous speech (PPSS model), Speech Communication, 13: 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M. et Peter-Defare, E. (1998) Les lapsus, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rossi, M., Di Cristo, A., Hirst, D. J., Martin, P. et Nishinuma, Y. (1981) L'intonation: de l'Acoustique à la sémantique, Klinckscieck: Paris.Google Scholar
Roudet, L. (1907) La désaccentuation et le déplacement de l'accent. Revue de Philologie Française et de Littérature, 4: 297–314.Google Scholar
Roudet, L. (1910) Eléments de phonétique générale. Paris: H. Welter: Librairie Universitaire.Google Scholar
Rousselot, J. P. (1924) Principes de phonétique expérimentale, T. ii. Paris: H. Welter.Google Scholar
Ŝaumjan, S. K. (1965) Strukturnaja Lingvistika. Moscou. Trad. 1971: Principles of Structural Linguistics. La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
Scherk, O. (1912) Über den französischen Akzent. Dissertation, Berlin: Schmersow, Kirchhain.Google Scholar
Schmerling, S. (1976) Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin: Austin University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Scott, D. R., Isard, S. D. et de Boissons-Bardies, B. (1985) Perceptual isochrony in English and in French, journal of Phonetics, 13: 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Séguinot, A. (1976) L'accent d'insistance en français standard. In Carton, F. et al. (eds). L'Accent d'insistance, Paris: Didier pp. 1–91.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1972) The Phrase Phonology of English and French. PhD diss., MIT. IULC, 1982.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1980) The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 11: 563–605.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1984) Phonology and Syntax. The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1990) On the nature of prosodic constituency: comments on Beckman and Edward's paper. In Kingston, J., et Beckman, M., (eds). Papers in Laboratory Phonology, I. Cambridge University Press: 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1995) The prosodic structure of function words. In Beckman, M., Urbanczyk, S., et Walsh, L., (eds), Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, GLSA, Amherst pp. 439–69.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. et Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Trad 1989: La Pertinence, Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Sten, H. (1963) Manuel de phonétique française, Copenhague: Munksgaard, 3e ed.Google Scholar
Touati, P. (1987) Structures prosodiques du suédois et du français. Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Trager, G. et Smith, H. L. (1951) An Outline of English Structure, Bettenburg Press.Google Scholar
Tranel, B. (1987) The Sounds of French. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togeby, K. (1965) Structure immanente de la langue français. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Troubetzkoy, N. S. (1949) Principes de phonologie, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Türk, E. (1994) Les fonctions et les formes du prosodème: étude comparative de l'allemand et du français. Thèse de doctorat d'Etat, Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Turk, A. E., Sawusch, J. R. (1995) The domain of the durational effects of accent. Research Lab. of Electronics MIT, Speech Communication Group Working Papers, vol. x: 42–65.Google Scholar
Uhmann, S. (1992) Contextualizing relevance: on some forms and functions of speech rate changes in everyday conversation. In Auer, P. et Di Luzio, A. (eds). The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Pub.: 297–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaissière, J. (1974) On French Prosody. Quarterly Progress Report (MIT), 114: 12–23.Google Scholar
Vaissière, J. (1975) Further note on French Prosody. Quarterly Progress Report (MIT), 115: 251–61.Google Scholar
Vaissière, J. (1991) Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In Sundberg, J. et al. , (eds). Music, Language, Brain and Speech. Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series, vol. 59: 108–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaissière, J. (1996) From Latin to Modern French: on diachronic changes and synchronic variations. Institut für Phonetik und Digitate Spraclwerarbeitung Universität Kiel, Arbeitsberichte (AIPUK) 31: 61–74.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. (1994) The dynamics of information packaging. In Engdahl, E., (ed.). Integrating Information Structure into Constraint-Based and Categorial Approaches. (YANA–2 Report R1.3.B). Amsterdam: ILLC pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Verluyten, P. (1982) Recherches sur la prosodie et la métrique du français, Doctoral Thesis, Antwerpen Universiteit.Google Scholar
Verluyten, P. (1983) La structuration de l'énoncé en groupes intonationnels. ITL, 60–61: 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verluyten, P. (1984) Phonetic reality of linguistic structures: the case of (secondary) stress in French. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Utrecht) pp. 522–6.Google Scholar
Vihanta, V. V. (1993) Focalisations et autres proéminences en français lu et spontané. Mélanges offerts à L. Lingren, Turun Yllopisto pp. 258–89.Google Scholar
Wells, R. S. (1945) The pitch phonemes of English. Language, 21: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenk, B. et Wioland, F. (1982) Is French really syllable-timed? fournal of Phonetics, 10: 93–216.Google Scholar
Wenk, B. et Wioland, F. (1983) Aspects rythmiques du discours radiophonique. In Charaudeau, P., (dir.): Aspects du Discours Radiophonique, Paris: Didier Erudition pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
Woodrow, H. (1951) Time perception. In Stevens, S. S., (ed.). Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley pp. 1224–36.Google Scholar
Zec, D. (1994) Footed tones and tonal feet: rhythmic constituency in a pitch accent language. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, 9: 223–83.Google Scholar