No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Agatharchos
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
Extract
Though I can hardly hope to justify it, I must record (as having given the impulse to this study) my impression that it was not so much the art of his days, as the theories built thereon, which led Plato to such definitions of the skiagraphia as ‘essentially servile and devoid of reality and truth,’ as ‘not altogether true nor pure,’ as ‘unclear and misleading,’ and as ‘an inferior coupled to an inferior and producing inferior offspring.’
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1920
References
1 Phaedo, 69 B.
2 Rep. 533 B.
3 Critias, 107 C.
4 Rep. 603 B.
5 Rep. 598 A.
6 Rep. 602 C.
7 Sext. Emp. vii. 1, 244.
8 Id. vii. 1, 389.
9 Vitruvius vii. 11. Namque primum Agatharchus Athen is Aeschylo docente tragoediam scaenam feeit et de ea commentarium reliquit; ex eo moniti Democritus et Anaxagoras de eadam re scripserunt, quem ad modum oporteat ad aciem oculorum radio rumque extentionem certo loco centro constitute lineas ratione naturali respondere, uti de certa re certae imagines aedificiorum in scaenorum picturis redderent speciem et, quae in directis planisque frontibus sint figurata, alia abscedentia, alia prominentia esse videantur.
10 Proclid. ad Euclid, ii. p. 19 (ed. Basil).
11 Diog. Laert. ix. 48.
12 Delbrück, , Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Linienperspective in der griechischen Kunst, p. 42Google Scholar. R. Schöne, Damianus Schrift über Optik, passim.
13 ix. 46–48.
14 73 ff.
15 “Diels 125, Aet. 75. 8 (D. 314)= Stob. Eclog. Phys. i. c. 17, p. 364: 
16 Diog. ix, 86 (Pyrrhon).
17 Veckenstedt, Edm., Geschichte der griech. Farbenlehre, p. 5Google Scholar (Stob., Eel. phys. i. 17. p. 364Google Scholar) and p. 7 (Plut., Ploc. Phil. i. 15)Google Scholar.
18 J.H.S. xvi. (1896), Pl. IV.; xix. (1899) Pl. II., Ephem. 1886, Pin. 4, 1905, Pin. 1. Riesler, W., Weissgrundige att. Lekythen, Taf. 4a, 44aGoogle Scholar; Banner Studien, Taf. XII.
19 Theophrastus, 73: 
20 l.c. 74: 
21 l.c. 75: 
22 l.c. 
23 l.c. 82: 
24 l.c. 76: 
25 l.c. 77: 
26 l.c.: 
27 l.c.: 
28 l.c.: 
29 Tim. 68 C.: 
30 Theophr. l.c. 77: 
31 Diog. Laert. ix. 36.
32 Sophist, 233 E.
33 Plut., Pericl. 13Google Scholar.
34 Dickins, Cat. I., no. 606.
35 Stranahan, C. H., A History of French Painting, p. 203Google Scholar.
36 N.H. xxxv. §29.
37 Pfuhl, , ‘Apollodorus ὁ σκιάλραφος,’ Jahrbuch xxv. (1910), p. 12 ffGoogle Scholar.
38 Poet. iv.
39 Wilpert, , Die röm. Mosaïken und Malereien, Taf. 156Google Scholar.
40 Benndorff, Dan Heroön von Gjölbaschi Trysa, Taf. XII., XXII.; Wlha, Joseph, Friesreliefs vom Heroön in Gjölhaschi-Trysa, Taf. 10 and 5–8Google Scholar; Brunn-Bruckmann, Denkmäler Gr. u. R. Sculptur, no. 486. My son Gijs, who studies architecture, made this figure for me from Benndorff's plate corrected by the photographs, indicating in broken lines what could be restored with certainty or was most probably indicated by painting on the original. Studying the exact forms of the akroterion in the temple, his attention was drawn by some forms in the tympanon. As he had sketched them I could not fail to recognise the bust of a winged figure, archaic in form, some Nike, as that of Arcliermos, or a Gorgon, as in the temple of Corfu.
41 In Dörpfeld, and Reisch, , Das griechische Theater, p. 197Google Scholar.
42 Judeich, , Topographie von Athen, p. 70Google Scholar, Plut., Kim. 13. 6Google Scholar.
43 Arch. Zeil., 1870, Taf. XXXVI., 1.
44 Mau, Geschichte der decorativen Wand malerei in Pompeii. Taf. III., Casa del Labirinto.
45 Andoc., c. Alcibiad. 17Google Scholar, Demosth., c. Meidiam, 147Google Scholar, with the scholia Plut., Alcibiad. 16Google Scholar.
- 4
- Cited by