¹ Reisen in Lykien, ii. p. 3, Fig. 2, No. 7.

² Loewy, , Arch. Ep. Mitt. vii. p. 124.Google Scholar

³ J.H.S. xv. p. 129. In C.B. i. p. 305 the names Μῆνις and Κακ[ασβ]ίς occur as priest and priestess of Demeter and Sabazios.

⁴ J.H.S. xxviii. p. 181, Fig. 1.

⁵ We owe this reference to Mr. Tod, whom, together with Dr. Farnell, we have to thank for assistance with this inscription.

⁶ For the name ᾿Αγαθὴ Τύχη cf. C.I.G. 6526 (at Rome), J.H.S. xv. p. 114, No. 30.

⁷ Reisen, i. p. 63, No. 30.

⁸ Ramsay, , C.B. i. p. 329Google Scholar; cf. also p. 54.

⁹ B.C.H. xii. p. 514, 1. 34; cf. Lanckoronski, Städte Pamphyliens und Pisidiens, ii. No. 221 (inscription at Sagalassos).

¹⁰ C.I.G. 2885 c.

^10a See Krause, , Olympia, p. 207Google Scholar and the references there collected.

¹¹ For the worship of the Kabeiroi at Tlos cf. J.H.S. xv. p. 122, No. 10.

¹² See above, No. 18.

¹³ Reisen, ii. No. 176; J.H.S. xv. p. 125, No. 18.

¹⁴ Ramsay, , C.B. i. p. 126.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Ramsay, op. cit. No. 178; B.C.H. 1879, p. 335.

¹⁶ B.M.C. Phrygia, p. 225, No. 1 seqq.

¹⁷ Berlin, , Neues Museum, No. 11, 415.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Steph. Byz. s.v. Κρύα.

¹⁹ Cf. C.I.G. 4243 (at Tlos).

²⁰ The principal are C.I.G. 2663, 3765. Also C.I.G. add. ii. 2942 b, 2942 c (= Kaibel, Epig. Gr. 290, 291, Rom. Mitt. xv. pp. 99 seqq.). Keil und von Premerstein, Bericht über eine zweite Reise in Lydien (Denkschr. der K. Akad. Wien philos.-Hist. Kl. liv.), p. 110, No. 213. B.S.A. xviii. p. 158, No. 30.

²¹ Isidor, , Etymolog. xviii. 55.Google Scholar Secutor ab insequendo retiarium dictus. Gestabat enim cuspidem et massam plumbeam, quae adversarii iaculum impediret, ut antequam ille feriret rete, ipse exsuperaret. Haee armatura sacrata erat Vulcano.

²² Ath. Mitt. xi. p. 132, No. 94= I.G. ix. 2, 982.

²³ E.g. τυγάτηρ = θυγάτηρ, Τέκλη = Θέκλη etc.

²⁴ I.e. the Tschukurbag of T.A.M. 54. In Jahreshefte, iii. Pt. 1, Beiblatt, p. 60, Prof. Kalinka gives the ethnic Πομαλίτης as occurring in an inscription at the site, and suggests Πόμαλα as the name.

²⁵ Travels in Lycia, i. p. 76.

²⁶ The form varies between arawazija (T.A.M. 44 b⁴⁶, 128, 135) and erawazija (40 c⁷, 117). Sundwall (Klio, 1911, 473) connects Karian (a)ravoss[y]ä, (a)rau(a)ssy with Lycian arawazija. His interpretation of arawa = freien Platz, e.g. heroum, in the light of Steph. Byz., ᾿´Ερευα ἡ καὶ ᾿Ελευθέρα is unconvincing. Kluge's suggestion (Muséon, xi. p. 15) that the word is to be connected with Gk. ἡρψον seems equally improbable. Mr. Arkwright gives us the following note: The rarer form er-awazija, not brought into harmony, shows the word to be a compound, probably from ere (ara), ‘succession,’ eri, ‘in succession,’ and *awazi, an adjective from awa, ‘with’ or ‘together.’ The suffix -ija forms a kind of collective, as in T.A.M. 84², hrzzě: is[b]azijê: (acc. sing.), ‘the upper row of benches,’ from isbazi, a ‘bench’ (κλίνη). The whole would mean ‘a set (of burial places) to be held in common in succession,’ i.e. ‘a hereditary family tomb.’

²⁷ This is the most probable explanation, although Kluge (Mitt. Vord. Gesch. 1910, p. 36) suggests that the word may possibly be a proper name. No. 25, where tlãñna = Τλωεύς pilleñni = ἐκ Πινάρων is a dedication rather than an epitaph. In 20²¹ Mr. Arkwright considers tlawad as more probably a personal name.

In No. 69 Kluge connects tubure with Tyberissos, but this is not certain; and in No. 43 he suggests that pñnutahi may be an ethnic (? from Pyduai), but in No. 12 pñnuteh tideimi is certainly a patronymic. The use of the ethnic in the present example would be justified if a Xanthian were building his tomb in a foreign city.

²⁸ We transliterate by ζ, following Mr. Arkwright, who regards as a sibilant very nearly approaching the Lycian Ι. (For his former view, now given up, = th, see jahreshefte ii. 68.)

²⁹ For such names cf. Κτασάδας (Reisen, ii. 176), Κτασκάας (ib. ii. p. 146, n. 2), Κτησκείτου (J.H.S. xv. p. 112, 20, 25).

³⁰ E.g. Torp, , Lykische Beitr. i. 34Google Scholar, as verbal substantive = Schädiger. See further, Kluge, op. cit. pp 49, 50.

³¹ If, as is possible, the suffix -ãi can also convey the sense of distribution over a space of time, awahai might be more simply rendered as ‘joint-rights from time to time’ or ‘successively.’

³² On the mindis v. Imbert, Mém. ix. 221, and Reisen, ii. No. 27, μὴ ἐξέστω δὲ ἀνοίγειν μηθενὶ ἄνευ τῆς μίνδιος, ἀλλὰ συμπαραινέτωσαν αὐτούς, where the mindis is explained as die Gesammtheit der συγγενεῖς Mr. Arkwright explains it as the κοινόν of the heirs, not of the kinsmen. In Reisen, ii. 27, Perpenenis, having no direct heirs, bequeathed his estate to his kinsmen, but such a bequest is most exceptional.

³³ Ramsay, , C.B. ii. 471.Google Scholar

³⁴ ἀμαρτωλὸς ἔστω θεοῖς καταχθονίοις (C.I.G. 4252 b, 4259, 4308, etc.).

³⁵ C.I.G. 4253, ἔστω ἰερόσυλος θεοῖς οὐρανίοις καὶ καταχθονίοις.

³⁶ Hesiod, Op. 122; cf. Rohde, , Psyche, p. 671.Google Scholar

³⁷ Heberdey, and Kalinka, in Denkschriften der K. Akad. zu Wien, xlv. p. 16, No. 49.Google Scholar

³⁸ I.G. ad Res Rom. pert. iii. 755.

³⁹ Ib. Nos. 300, 312, 555, 729 (?).

⁴⁰ Cf. ΑYΙΛΙΟΝ φΙΡΜΟΝ a legate of the Flavian period (ib. 725 at Myra).

⁴¹ B.C.H. xvi. Nos. 29, 88. The name ᾿Επάφρυτος, however, is found C.I.G. 5054, where it is probably genitive (see Pape-Benseler, s.v.).

⁴² Bericht, p. 5, Nos. 13 and 16.

⁴³ C.I.G. 4331. ῾Ηρόσων δρεάρις χρηματισθεὶς κατ᾿ ὄναρ τοῖς θεοῖς ἐποίησα.

⁴⁴ C.I.G. 583.

⁴⁵ For Sozon see Hill, in J.H.S. 1895, pp. 129, 130Google Scholar, and references there.

⁴⁶ Heberdey, and Kalinka, , Denk. der K. Akad. in Wien, xlv. p. 27, No. 26.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Bérard, ib.

⁴⁸ Heberdey and Kalinka, ib. p. 11, No. 34.

⁴⁹ Cf. Reisen, ii. 114. Εὐτύχου Μυρέως ἀπὸ Τρεβένδων

⁵⁰ Cf. Dittenberger, O.K.I. No. 656.

⁵¹ At Ancyra, I.G. ad Res Rom. pert. iii. 175.