Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T20:27:16.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems with phonological chains1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Anthony Fox
Anthony Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Leeds
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I. Chains are familiar in diachronic phonology as sets of shifts of the form A>B, B>C, C>D, etc. Well-known examples include the following (cf. Martinet, 1955: Ch. 2):

(I)(a) Grimm's Law: bh>b>p>f

(b) Azores Portuguese: a>doubt:>о>u>y

(c) Great English Vowel Shift: æ>doubt:ēī>ai

(d) Hauteville dialect: ề>doubt:ε>a>doubt:

(e) High German Consonant Shift: d>>ts/s

(f) Latin>Italian: kui>kwi>ki>tfi

Martinet (1952, 1955) gives a ‘functional’ interpretation of this phenomenon, distinguishing between ‘push’ and ‘drag’ chains; King (1969), arguing from a generative point of view, rejects the ‘push’ variety, and considers ‘drag’ chains to be a case of rule simplification.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , September 1976, pp. 289 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, H. (1972). Diphthongization. Lg 48. 11–50.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1970). A systematic phonological interpretation of the English vowel shift. Glossa 4.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1962). A descriptive convention for treating assimilation and dissimilation. MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, Quarterly Progress Report 66. 295–296.Google Scholar
Hoard, J. (1972). Naturalness conditions in phonology, with particular reference to English vowels. In Brame, M. K. (ed.), Contributions to generative phonology. Austin: University of Texas. 123–154.Google Scholar
Hoard, J. E. & Sloat, C. (1973). English irregular verbs. Lg 49. 107–120.Google Scholar
King, R. D. (1969). Push chains and drag chains. Glossa 3. 3–21.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1952). Function, structure, and sound change. Word 8. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, A. (1955). Economie des changements phonétiques. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1968). German phonology. (Ph.D. dissertation), Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S-Y. (1967). Phonological features of tone. IJAL 33. 93–105.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S-Y. (1968). Vowel features, paired variables, and the English vowel shift. Lg 44. 695–708.Google Scholar