Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:39:12.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particle size effects on colloidal processing of oxide powders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yoshihiro Hirata,
Ichiroh Haraguchi and
Yoshimi Ishihara
Yoshihiro Hirata*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kagoshima University, 1-21-40 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890, Japan
Ichiroh Haraguchi
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kagoshima University, 1-21-40 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890, Japan
Yoshimi Ishihara
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kagoshima University, 1-21-40 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890, Japan
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access

Abstract

Rheological behavior, properties of colloidal solids consolidated by filtration, and their structure change during drying were studied with aqueous suspensions of a mullite powder of nanometer size and two kinds of alumina powders of submicrometer sizes. The rheological properties of non-Newtonian flow suspensions were analyzed by a power law equation of S = K γn, where S is the shear stress, γ the shear rate, and K and n (O ⋚ n ⋚ 1) constants. The critical solids content (Vc) at n = O (indicating colloidal solids) depended greatly on the zeta potential of particles in suspensions, and dominated the densities of dried green compacts (Vg) of submicrometer sized powders. In a nanometer sized powder, the densities of dried green compacts were dependent on both Vc value and the solid contents of suspensions. Phase diagrams of one-component colloidal systems were constructed by plotting the Vc and Vg values against the zeta potential of particles. These phase diagrams indicate that the colloidal solids range (surrounded by Vc and a minimum Vg lines) is narrow for nanometer sized powder and wide for submicrometer sized powder. The solids content range of dried green compacts was very narrow for submicrometer sized powder but relatively wide for nanometer sized powder due to the low flexibility of colloidal structure during drying.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 9 , September 1992, pp. 2572 - 2578
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Aksay, L. A., Lange, F.F., and Davis, B.I., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66 (10), C-190-C-192 (1983).Google Scholar
2.Lange, F. F., Davis, B. I., and Wright, E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 (1), 66–69 (1986).Google Scholar
3.Hirata, Y. and Aksay, I. A., in Ceramic Microstructures in ‘86, Role of Interfaces, edited by Pask, J. A. and Evans, A. G. (Plenum Press, New York, 1987), pp. 612–622.Google Scholar
4.Lee, H. and Sacks, M.D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (7), 1884–1893 (1990).Google Scholar
5.Lee, H. and Sacks, M.D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (7), 1894–1900 (1990).Google Scholar
6.Aksay, I. A., in Ceramics: Today and Tomorrow, edited by Naka, S., Soga, N., and Kume, S. (Ceramic Society of Japan, 1986), pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
7.Hirata, Y., in Proc. Int. Symp. on Fine Ceramics Arita ‘91, Saga Prefectural Government, 31–46 (1991).Google Scholar
8.Hirata, Y., Nakagama, S., and Ishihara, Y., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 98 (4), 316–321 (1990).Google Scholar
9.Bleier, A. and Westmoreland, G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (12), 3100–3111 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Chang, J. C., Velamakanni, B. V., Lange, F. F., and Pearson, D. S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (9), 2201–2204 (1991).Google Scholar
11.Hirata, Y., Haraguchi, I., and Ishihara, Y., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 98 (9), 951–956 (1990).Google Scholar
12.Hirata, Y., Matsushita, S., Nakagama, S., Ishihara, Y., and Hori, S., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 97 (9), 881–887 (1989).Google Scholar
13.Russel, W.B., Mater. Res. Bull. XVI (8), 27–31 (1991).Google Scholar
14.Aksay, I. A. and Kikuchi, R., in Science of Ceramic Chemical Processing, edited by Hench, L. L. and Ulrich, D. R. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1986), pp. 513–521.Google Scholar
15.Kuhn, L. T., McMeeking, R. M., and Lange, F. F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (3), 682–685 (1991).Google Scholar
16.Hoffman, R. L., Mater. Res. Bull. XVI (8), 32–37 (1991).Google Scholar
17.Velamakanni, B. V. and Lange, F. F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (1), 166–172 (1991).Google Scholar
18.Philipse, A.P., Bonekamp, B.C., and Veringa, H.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (9), 2720–2727 (1990).Google Scholar
19.Williams, P.D. and Hawn, D.D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (7), 1614–1618 (1991).Google Scholar
20.Hirata, Y., Nakagama, S., and Ishihara, Y., J. Mater. Res. 5, 640–646 (1990).Google Scholar
21.Reed, J., in Introduction to the Principles of Ceramic Processing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1988), pp. 229–231.Google Scholar