Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T20:06:17.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy considerations regarding yield points during indentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

D. F. Bahr,
D. E. Wilson and
D. A. Crowson
D. F. Bahr*
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164–2920
D. E. Wilson
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164–2920
D. A. Crowson
Affiliation:
Nanomechanics Research Laboratory, Hysitron Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: bahr@mme.wsu.edu
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments that probe the nature of the rapid transition from elastic to plastic deformation are described. The load, and therefore stress, at which this yield point occurs is shown to be relatively independent of temperature in an iron alloy. When stresses lower than those required to generate a yield point during loading are applied for times between seconds and minutes, yielding occurs while the sample is under an applied stress. The time to generate a yield point increases as the applied stress is decreased. The possibilities of dislocation glide loop nucleation, double kink nucleation, and dislocation breakaway from pinning points are examined. Only glide loop nucleation appears to match the experimental observations. Criteria based on the stress-volume requirements of glide loop nucleation and the stress field underneath an indenter are presented which qualitatively describe the experimental data.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , June 1999, pp. 2269 - 2275
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Gane, N. and Bowden, F. P., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1432 (1968).Google Scholar
2.Hertz, H., Miscellaneous Papers by Heinrich Hertz, edited by Jones, D. E. and Schott, G. A. (Macmillan, London, 1896), pp. 163–183.Google Scholar
3.Mann, A. B. and Pethica, J. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 907 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gerberich, W.W., Venkataraman, S. K., Huang, H., Harvey, S. E., and Kohlstedt, D. L., Acta. Metall. Mater. 43, 1569 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Page, T.F., Oliver, W.C., and McHargue, C. J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 450 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Syed Asif, S. A. and Pethica, J. B., Philos. Mag. A. 76, 1105 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Bahr, D. F., Kramer, D. E., and Gerberich, W. W., Acta Mater. 46, 3605 (1998).Google Scholar
8.Hirth, J. P. and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1982), pp. 168, 169, 531–544, 639–693, 757–759.Google Scholar
9.Michalske, T.A. and Houston, J. E., Acta Mater. 46, 391 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Gerberich, W.W., Nelson, J. C., Lilleodden, E.T., Anderson, P., and Wyrobek, J. T., Acta Mater. 44, 3585 (1996).Google Scholar
11.Bahr, D. F., Watkins, C. M., Kramer, D.E., and Gerberich, W.W., in Fundamentals of Nanoindentation and Nanotribology (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 522, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998), p. 83.Google Scholar
12.Mann, A. B., Serason, P. C., Pethica, J. B., and Weihs, T. P., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VII, edited by Cammarata, R. C., Busso, E. P., Nastasi, M., and Oliver, W.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 505, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998), p. 307.Google Scholar
13.Mann, A. B. and Pethica, J.B., Philos. Mag. A, (1999, in press).Google Scholar
14.Wu, T.W., J. Mater. Res. 6, 407 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Private communication, Nelson, J. C., University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
16.Corcoran, S. G., Colton, R. J., Lilleodden, E. T., and Gerberich, W.W., Phys. Rev. B 55, R16057 (1997).Google Scholar
17.Page, T.F., Oliver, W.C., and Mc, C. J.Hargue, J. Mater. Res. 7, 450 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Johnson, K. L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1985), pp. 85–95.Google Scholar
19.Kamat, S. V. and Hirth, J. P., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6844 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Kiely, J. D. and Houston, J. E., Phys. Rev. B 57, 12588 (1998).Google Scholar