Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T18:12:58.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Law and Certifying Practitioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

The Rt. Hon*
Affiliation:
Royal Medico-Psychological Association
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Recent decisions in the Law Courts leave the law relating to improper or negligent certification in a very unsatisfactory position; and that not only from the point of view of the medical practitioner. The effect of the decision in Harnett v. Fisher ([1927] Appeal Cases 573) is that a person of sound mind who has been improperly certified as insane through the negligence of the certifying physician, and has as a result of that negligence been deprived of his liberty for a period exceeding six years during which it has been impossible for him to take legal proceedings, is by his failure to do so—in other words, by the very gravity of the wrong that he has suffered—deprived of any remedy for that wrong against the person to whose negligence it is traceable.

Information

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1929 
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.