Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T18:13:14.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modification of Insulin Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Edward Marley
Edward Marley*
Affiliation:
The Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals Formerly at Severalls Hospital, Colchester
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Sakel (1938a) drew attention to the difficulty of establishing satisfactory comas in a minority of patients attending for Deep Insulin therapy. This phenomenon has since been confirmed by other workers including Tillim (1938) whose patient received 500 units of insulin without the production of deep coma, by Hall (1940) who reported an instance in which 1,000 units of insulin was equally unsuccessful, by Reznikoff and Scott (1942) who described how neither 120 nor 1,000 units of insulin when injected intravenously produced any significant difference in hypoglycaemia in insulin resistant patients, and more recently by Fogarty (1953) whose case required 5,000 units of insulin for the production even of sopor. Other recorded examples of resistance to massive doses of insulin include those of Banting et al. (1938) and Tennent (1944).

Various explanations of this perverse response to insulin have been formulated, including that of Jones (1939) who proposed that resistance to insulin was both a problem of true insulin insensitivity and also of an anomalous response of the central nervous system to hypoglycaemia. Meduna et al. (1942) preferred to ascribe it to anti-insulin factors in the blood, but a more interesting interpretation derived from Freudenberg (1952) who suggested that if the effects of high insulin dosage employed in insulin coma treatment were regarded as a special instance of a stress response, then the fluctuations and differences in response could be equated in terms of the General Adaptation Syndrome of Selye. High doses were thus an index of an effective “alarm stage” characterized by a discharge from plentiful adrenocortical reserves.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 102 , Issue 428 , July 1956, pp. 576 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

References

Alexander, L., Treatment of Mental Disorders, 1953. 1st ed., p. 244. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Banting, F. G., Franks, W. R., and Gairns, S., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1938, 95, 562.Google Scholar
Buss, E. L., Migeon, C. J., Nelson, D. H., Samuels, L. T., and Hardin Branch, C. H., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1954, 72, 352.Google Scholar
Bondy, P. K., Endocrinology, 1949, 45, 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, J. P., and de Duve, C., Physiol. Rev., 1947, 27, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, S. W., Geiling, E. M. K., and Calvery, H. O., Amer. J. Physiol., 1928, 84, 141.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. M., ibid., 1934, 107, 577.Google Scholar
Burn, J. H., J. Physiol., 1923, 57, 318.Google Scholar
Cannon, W. B., McIver, M. A., and Bliss, S. W., Amer. J. Physiol., 1924, 69, 46.Google Scholar
Cleghorn, R. A., Goodman, A. J., Graham, B. F., Jones, M. H., and Rublee, N. K., J. clin. Endocrinol., 1948, 8, 608.Google Scholar
Crandall, L. A., and Cherry, I. S., Amer. J. Physiol., 1939, 125, 658.Google Scholar
Douthwaite, A. H., and Thorne, M. G., Brit. med. J., 1951, i, 111.Google Scholar
Dworkin, S., Amer. J. Physiol., 1931, 98, 467.Google Scholar
Engel, F. L., J. Mt. Sinai Hosp., 1945, 12, 152.Google Scholar
Idem , Endocrinology, 1949, 45, 170.Google Scholar
Fogarty, J. P., J. Irish med. Ass., 1953, 33, 77.Google Scholar
Frank, J. D., Endocrinology, 1940, 27, 447.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, R. K., J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 441.Google Scholar
Friesen, S. R., and Wangensteen, J. R., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. N. Y., 1946, 63, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frostig, J. P., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1940, 96, 1167.Google Scholar
Fulton, J. F., Textbook of Physiology, 1949. 16th ed., p. 665. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, D. H., Greenblatt, M., and Solomon, H. C., Psychosom. Med., 1952, 14, 347.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. A., and Jefferies, H. S., Quart. J. Pharm., 1946, 19, 48.Google Scholar
Grant, R. T., and Reeve, E. B., Observations on the General Effects of injury in Man, 1951, 1st ed., p. 224. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Green, H. N., and Bullough, W. S., Brit. J. exp. Path., 1950, 31, 175.Google Scholar
Green, H. N., and Ghadially, F. N., Brit. med. J., 1951, i, 496.Google Scholar
Haist, R. E., and Hamilton, J. I., J. Physiol., 1944, 102, 471.Google Scholar
Hall, G. E., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1940, 95, 553.Google Scholar
Hallion, L., and Gayet, R., C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 1925, 92, 945.Google Scholar
Halpern, F. G., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1940, 96, 1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harington, M., and Rosenheim, M. L., Lancet, 1954, i, 7.Google Scholar
Herbert, F. K., and Bourne, M. C., Biochem. J., 1930, 24, 299.Google Scholar
Himwich, H. E., Brain Metabolism and Cerebral Disorders, 1951a. 1st ed., p. 61. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1951b, p. 277.Google Scholar
Jones, M. S., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1939, 32, 958.Google Scholar
Jourdan, F., Laflaquiere, J., and Maitre, P., C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 1943, 137, 124.Google Scholar
Kalinowsky, L. B., and Hoch, P. H., Shock Treatments, 1946. 1st ed., p. 24. London.Google Scholar
Kay, A. W., and Smith, A. N., Brit. med. J., 1950, i, 460.Google Scholar
Kay, W. W., and Thorley, A. S., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1951, 44, 973.Google Scholar
Lambret, O., and Driessens, J., J. int. Chir., 1937, 2, 223.Google Scholar
Laugier, H., and Leblond, C. P., Rev. canad. Biol., 1943, 2, 474.Google Scholar
Laurence, D. R., and Stacey, R. S., Lancet, 1951, ii, 1145.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. T., C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 1923, 89, 1118.Google Scholar
Manners, T., Brit. med. J., 1951, i, 1429.Google Scholar
Marley, E., M.D. Thesis, 1953, p. 55. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McDonough, F. N., Amer. J. Physiol., 1939, 125, 530.Google Scholar
McMichael, J., Quart. J. exp. Physiol., 1938, 27, 73.Google Scholar
Idem , Brit. med. Bull., 1945, 3, 105.Google Scholar
Meduna, L. J., Gerty, F. J., and Urse, V. G., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1942, 47, 38.Google Scholar
Montagu, J. D., J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 112.Google Scholar
Nastuk, W. L., Amer. J. Physiol., 1947, 149, 369.Google Scholar
Paton, W. D. M., Brit. med. J., 1951, i, 773.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, M., and Mufson, M., J. clin. Endocrinol., 1951, 11, 277.Google Scholar
Reznikoff, L., and Scott, J. J., Psychiat. Quart., 1942, 16, 399.Google Scholar
Roche, M., Hills, A. G., and Thorn, G. W., Proceedings of the First Clinical ACTH Conference, 1950, p. 55. London.Google Scholar
Rud, F., “The Eosinophil Count in Health and in Mental Disease”, Acta Psychiat. Kbh., Supplement XL, 1947, p. 184.Google Scholar
Russel, J. A., Long, C. N. H., and Engel, F. L., J. exp. Med., 1944, 79, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakel, M., The Pharmacological Shock Treatment of Schizophrenia, 1938a, 1st ed., p. 87. New York.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1938b, p. 11.Google Scholar
Idem , Congres International de Psychiatrie, 1950, vol. IV, p. 163. Paris.Google Scholar
Sayers, G., and Sayers, M. A., Endocrinology, 1947, 40, 265.Google Scholar
Idem , Recent Progress in Hormone Research, 1948, 2, 81. New York.Google Scholar
Schachter, M., J. Physiol., 1951, 115, 206.Google Scholar
Schlossberg, T., Sawyer, M. E. M., and Bixby, E. M., Amer. J. Physiol., 1933, 104, 190.Google Scholar
Selye, H., Arch. int. Pharmacodyn., 1938, 60, 259.Google Scholar
Idem , J. clin. Endocrinol., 1946, 6, 117.Google Scholar
Idem , Stress, 1950a, 1st ed., p. 105. Montreal.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1950b, p. 53.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1950c, p. 27.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1950d, p. 51.Google Scholar
Idem , Ann. Rev. Med., 1951, 2, 327.Google Scholar
Sherwood, S. L., Brain, 1952, 75, 68.Google Scholar
Soskin, S., Physiol. Rev., 1941, 21, 140.Google Scholar
Speirs, R. S., and Meyer, R. K., Endocrinology, 1949, 45, 403.Google Scholar
Stell, B. S., Psychiat. Quart., 1945, 19, 438.Google Scholar
Straccia, F. A., and Schefflin, A. E., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1952, 108, 702.Google Scholar
Sundberg, C. G., C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 1923, 89, 807.Google Scholar
Swann, H. G., and Fitzgerald, J. W., Endocrinology, 1938, 22, 687.Google Scholar
Swingle, W. W., Remington, J. W., Drill, V. A., and Kleinberg, W., Amer. J. Physiol., 1942, 136, 567.Google Scholar
Talbot, N. B., Albright, F., Saltzman, A. H., Zygmuntowicz, A., and Wixom, R., J. clin. Endocrinol., 1947, 7, 331.Google Scholar
Tennent, T., Recent Progress in Psychiatry, 1944, p. 467. London.Google Scholar
Tillim, S. J., Med. Rec., N.Y., 1938, 147, 112.Google Scholar
Vogt, M., J. Physiol., 1947, 106, 394.Google Scholar
Wagner, H. N., and Woods, J. W., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1950, 64, 720.Google Scholar
Wiggers, C. J., Physiology of Shock, 1950, 1st ed., p. 406. New York.Google Scholar
Zucker, T. F., and Berg, B. N., Amer. J. Physiol., 1937, 119, 539.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.