Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T08:45:11.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Progress with Risk Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

P. H. Tanner
P. H. Tanner
Affiliation:
(University of Glasgow)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In an earlier contribution to this Journal the Author described some striking characteristics of the casualty statistics for the airline operations of the western world and proposed a model for the generation of a perceived risk by an individual living in a dangerous environment. It was hoped that a simulation including a population of such risk observers in the feedback loop of a control system might help with the understanding of what was happening in the real world of operations. Since then he has published an account of the development of the model, including some results from the simulation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 39 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1Tanner, P. H. (1979). Risk: taken or controlled? This Journal, 32, 395.Google Scholar
2Tanner, P. H. (1981). A model of a population composed of individuals regulating their own level of risk. U.K. Simulation Council conference on Computer Simulation, 1981, Proceedings, p.316.Google Scholar
3Yule, G. U. (1922). Journal R. Statistical Society, 85, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Cox, D. R. & Lewis, P. A. W. (1966). The Statistical Analysis of Series of Events. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
5Maguire, B. A., Pearson, E. S. and Wynn, E. H. A. (1952). The time intervals between industrial accidents. Biometrika, 39, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Thomas, J. (1981).The efficacy of seat belt legislation. Occasional Paper No. 38, Department of Geography, University College, London.Google Scholar
7Koestler, A. (1972). The Roots of Coincidence. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
8International Atomic Energy Agency (1980). Bulletin, 22, 99.Google Scholar