Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T12:20:34.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Requirements for Coordination and the Application of an Automatic Collision Avoidance System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Chris Perkins and
Tony Redfern
Chris Perkins
Affiliation:
(Institute of Marine Studies, University of Plymouth)
Tony Redfern
Affiliation:
(Institute of Marine Studies, University of Plymouth)
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the legislative change which would have to take place if an automatic collision avoidance system were to be implemented.

The principle of complementary action, and the role of coordination in achieving that action is considered. Current collision avoidance practice is discussed, noting the coordination attributes of the International Regulations for the Prevention of Collision at Sea, and the responsibility placed on the mariner by the regulations. The processing element of an automatic collision avoidance system is considered in the light of current judicial practice.

The paper concludes that the implementation of an automatic collision avoidance system is incompatible with the current collision regulations and the supporting judiciary. It is suggested that successful implementation will require the recognition of a discrete rule base.

Keywords

1. Collision avoidance2. Collision regulations3. Expert systems

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , May 1996, pp. 129 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1 Editorial (1994). Human error leads claim. Safety at Sea International. Pp.12 – 13, March,1994.Google Scholar
2Blackwell, G. K. (1992). An expert systems approach to collision avoidance. Ph.D. Thesis, CNAA (University of Plymouth).Google Scholar
3coenen, F. P. (1989). A rule-based collision avoidance system. Ph.D. Thesis, CNAA(Liverpool Polytechnic), 1989.Google Scholar
4Iijima, Y.et.al (1991). Results of collision avoidance manoeuvre experiments using acknowledge-based autonomous piloting sytem. This Journal, 44,194–204.Google Scholar
5Perkins, c. J.Redfern, A. (1993). Collision avoidance, collision regulations and technology. In: NAV 93 Practical Navigation – The Application of Advanced Systems, paper 37,6 pp. Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference of the Royal Institute of Navigation, London.Google Scholar
6International Maritime Organization. (1981). International Regulations For The Prevention Of Collision At Sea,1972.Google Scholar
7Calvert, E. S. (1960) Manoeuvres to ensure the avoidance of collision. This Journal, 13,127 – 137.Google Scholar
8Kemp, J. F. (1977). Collision avoidance by manoeuvre. In: Safety at Sea, 1977, pp. 161–169. Proceedings, Second West European Conference on Marine Technology, London.Google Scholar
9Cannell, W.P. (1981) Collision avoidance as a game of co-ordination. This Journal, 34,220–239.Google Scholar
10 Ship identification and data transfer: can there be one system? Proceedings, Nautical Institute Conference, London, 1994, Nautical Institute, 1994.Google Scholar
11Kemp, J. F. (1994) Factors in the prevention of collisions at sea. Ph.D. thesis, CNAA (City of London Polytechnic).Google Scholar
12Redfern, A. (1993)Watchkeeper collision avoidance behaviour. Research specification MS92/49/046, Project 305, for the Marine Directorate, Dept. of Transport, UK. University of Plymouth.Google Scholar
13Habberley, J. STaylor, D. H. (1990) The uncertainty of collision avoidance: a simulator study. In: Maritime Communications and Control, 1990, pp.63–68Proceedings, Institute of Marine Engineers International Conference, London.Google Scholar
14Perkins, C. J. (1995)Questionnaire evidence of mariners' behaviour at sea. Unpublished research findings. Institute of Marine Studies, University of Plymouth.Google Scholar
15Goodwin, E. M. (1975)A statistical study of ship domains. This Journal 28, 328–341.Google Scholar
16Beedel, R. (ed) (1990–1995). Marine accident reporting scheme, Seaways.Google Scholar
17Schauer, F. (1991)Playing By the Rules. A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision Making in Law and in Life. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
18International Maritime Organization. (1981). International Regulations For The Prevention Of Collision At Sea,1972.Google Scholar
19International Maritime Organization. (1981). International Regulations For The Prevention Of Collision At Sea,1972.Google Scholar