Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:43:31.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finite-Larmor-radius flute-mode theory with end loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

I. A. Kotelnikov and
H. L. Berk
I. A. Kotelnikov
Affiliation:
Institute for Fusion Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
H. L. Berk
Affiliation:
Institute for Fusion Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theory of flute-mode stability is developed for a two-energy-component plasma partially terminated by a conducting limiter. The formalism is developed as a preliminary study of the effect of end loss in open-ended mirror machines, where large-Larmor-radius effects are important.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 1994, pp. 309 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anikeev, A. A., Ivanov, A. A., Bagryansky, P. A., Bocharov, V. N., Deichuli, P. P., Karpushov, A. N., Pod'minogin, A. A., Rogozin, A. I., Salikova, T. V. &Tsidulko, Yu. A. 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1, 2072.Google Scholar
Berk, H. L. &Kotelnikov, I. A. 1993 Phys. Lett. 181A, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, H. L., Rosenbluth, M. N., Van, Dam J. &Spong, D. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, H. L., Ryutov, D. D. &Tsidulko, Yu. A. 1991 Phys. Fluids B 3, 1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, H. L. &Wong, H. V. 1987 Z. Naturforsch. 42a, 1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, H. L., Wong, H. V. &Tsang, K. T. 1987 Phys. Fluids 30, 2681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, B. I., Freis, R. P. &Newcomb, W. A. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominguez, R. R. &Berk, H. L. 1984 Phys. Fluids 27, 1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. M. &Coppi, B. 1965 Phys. Fluids 8, 1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, T. &Cohen, B. 1977 Phys. Fluids 30, 1564.Google Scholar
Krall, N. A. 1966 Phys. Fluids 9, 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krall, J., Seyler, C. E. &Sudan, R. N. 1991 Phys. Fluids B 3, 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, W. K. &Guillory, J. U. 1965 Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Phenomena in lonized Gases, Belgrade, 1965, vol. 2, p. 702. Grad Jevinska Kniga, Belgrade (1966).Google Scholar
Lansky, I. M. &Stupakov, G. V. 1990 Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 16, 676.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Horton, W. &Sedlak, J. E. 1987 Phys. Fluids 30, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhaylovskaya, L. V. 1984 Soviet J. Plasma Phys. 10, 345.Google Scholar
Newcomb, W. A. 1973 Ann. Phys. (NY) 81, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, M. N., Krall, N. A. &Rostoker, N. 1962 Nucl. Fusion Suppl. 1, 143.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, M. N. &Longmire, C. L. 1957 Ann. Phys. (NY) 1, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timofeev, A. V. 1979 JETP Lett. 29, 227.Google Scholar
Wong, H. V., Rosenbluth, M. N. &Berk, H. L. 1989 Phys. Fluids B 1, 826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar